Acta Biotheoretica

, Volume 51, Issue 3, pp 181–188

Parametric Scaling from Species Relative Abundances to Absolute Abundances in the Computation of Biological Diversity: A First Proposal Using Shannon's Entropy

  • Carlo Ricotta
Article

Abstract

Traditional diversity measures such as the Shannon entropy are generally computed from the species' relative abundance vector of a given community to the exclusion of species' absolute abundances. In this paper, I first mention some examples where the total information content associated with a given community may be more adequate than Shannon's average information content for a better understanding of ecosystem functioning. Next, I propose a parametric measure of statistical information that contains both Shannon's entropy and total information content as special cases of this more general function.

information-theory mass ratio hypothesis parametric diversity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Aarsen, L.W. (1997). High productivity in grassland ecosystems: effected by species diversity or productive species? Oikos 80: 183–184.Google Scholar
  2. Aczél, J. and Z. Daróczy (1975). On Measures of Information and their Characterizations. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Baczkowski, A.J., D.N. Joanes and G.M. Shamia (2000). The distribution of a generalized diversity index due to Good. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 7: 329–342.Google Scholar
  4. Brillouin, L. (1956). Science and Information Theory. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Chiarucci, A., J.B. Wilson, B.J. Anderson and V. De Dominicis (1999). Cover versus biomass as an estimate of species abundance: does it make a difference to the conclusions? Journal of Vegetation Science 10: 35–42.Google Scholar
  6. Díaz, S. and M. Cabido (2001). Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 646–655.Google Scholar
  7. Grime, J.P. (1998). Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology 86: 902–910.Google Scholar
  8. He, X.S. and L. Orlóci (1993). Comparative diversity analysis of vegetation. Abstracta Botanica 17: 79–86.Google Scholar
  9. Hill, M.O. (1973). Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54: 427–431.Google Scholar
  10. Huston, M.A. (1997). Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110: 449–460.Google Scholar
  11. Lyons, K.G. and M.W. Schwartz (2001). Rare species loss alters ecosystem function — invasion resistance. Ecology Letters 4: 358–365.Google Scholar
  12. Magurran, A. (1988). Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  13. Margalef, D.R. (1958). Information theory in ecology. General Systems Yearbook 3: 36–71.Google Scholar
  14. Pastor, J. and W.M. Post (1986). Influence of climate, soil moisture and succession on forest carbon and nitrogen cycles. Biogeochemistry 2: 3–27.Google Scholar
  15. Patil, G.P. and C. Taillie (1982). Diversity as a concept and its measurement. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77: 548–567.Google Scholar
  16. Pielou, E.C. (1966). The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology 13:131–144.Google Scholar
  17. Podani, J. (1992). Space series analysis: processes reconsidered. Abstracta Botanica 16: 25–29.Google Scholar
  18. Précsényi, I. and I. Mészáros (1999). An application of communication system theory to the study of soil-plant relationships. Coenoses 14: 7–12.Google Scholar
  19. Rényi, A. (1970). Probability Theory. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  20. Ricotta, C. (2000). From theoretical ecology to statistical physics and back: self-similar landscape metrics as a synthesis of ecological diversity and geometrical complexity, Ecological Modelling 125: 245–253.Google Scholar
  21. Rousseau, R., P. VanHecke, D. Nijssen and J. Bogaert (1999). The relationship between diversity profiles, evenness and species richness based on partial ordering. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 6: 211–223.Google Scholar
  22. Shannon, C. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Systems Technical Journal 27: 379–423.Google Scholar
  23. Shugart, H.H. (1984). A Theory of Forest Dynamics. Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Tóthmérész, B. (1995). Comparison of different methods for diversity ordering. Journal of Vegetation Science 6: 283–290.Google Scholar
  25. Tsallis, C. (2002). Entropic nonextensivity: a possible measure of complexity. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 13: 371–391.Google Scholar
  26. Wilson, J.B. (1991). Methods for fitting dominance/diversity curves. Journal of Vegetation Science 2: 35–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlo Ricotta
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant BiologyUniversity of Rome “La Sapienza”RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations