Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 143–150 | Cite as

Corporate Versus Individual Moral Responsibility

  • C. Soares


There is a clear tendency in contemporary political/legal thought to limit agency to individual agents, thereby denying the existence and relevance of collective moral agency in general, and corporate agency in particular. This tendency is ultimately rooted in two particular forms of individualism – methodological and fictive (abstract) – which have their source in the Enlightenment. Furthermore, the dominant notion of moral agency owes a lot to Kant whose moral/legal philosophy is grounded exclusively on abstract reason and personal autonomy, to the detriment of a due recognition of the socio-historical grounds of moral social conduct.

I shall argue that an adequate theory of responsibility is needed, which does not only take into account individual responsibility, but also collective and corporate responsibility, capable of taking into consideration society and its problems. Furthermore, corporations are consciously and carefully structured organisations with different levels of management and have clearly defined aims and objectives, a central feature upon which I shall be focussing in this paper.

agency corporate moral agency individual individualist moral responsibility nominalists realist 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brytting T.: 2000, 'From Institutional Context to Personal Responsibility', Business Ethics-Broadening Perspectives (Peters, Leuven), pp. 89-95.Google Scholar
  2. Clarkson, C. M. V.: 1982, 'Corporate Culpability', Web Journal of Current Legal Issues, 1-16.Google Scholar
  3. Donaldson T.: 1982, Corporations and Morality (Englewood Cliffs-Prentice Hall, New York).Google Scholar
  4. Fisse B. and J. Braithwaite: 1988, 'The Allocation of Responsibility for Corporate Crime: Individualism, Collectivism and Accountability', Sydney Law Review 11, 468-513.Google Scholar
  5. French Peter: 1995, Corporate Ethics (Harcourt Brace College Publishers, London).Google Scholar
  6. French Peter: 1996, 'Corporate Moral Agency', in Patricia Werhane and R. Edward Freeman (eds.), Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business Ethics, vol. XI (Blackwell, London), pp. 148-151.Google Scholar
  7. Goodpaster K. and B. Matthews: 1982, 'Can a Corporation have a Conscience?' Harvard Business Review (January-February), 32-41.Google Scholar
  8. Ladd John: 1970, 'Morality and the Ideal of Rationality in Formal Organizations', The Monist (October), 485-501.Google Scholar
  9. Lee Keekok: 1989, Social Philosophy and Ecological Scarcity (Routledge, London).Google Scholar
  10. Lukes, Steven: 1973, Individualism (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).Google Scholar
  11. Novak Michael: 1997, The Fire of Invention: Civil Society and the Future of the Corporation (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc, New York).Google Scholar
  12. Pheby, Keith: 1997, 'The Psychological Contract: Enacting Ethico-power', in Peter W. F. Davies (ed.), Current Issues in Business Ethics (Routledge, London).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Soares
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro Regional do PortoUniversidade Católica PortuguesaPorto-Portugal

Personalised recommendations