Advertisement

The Importance of Offense Characteristics, Victimization History, Hostility, and Social Desirability in Assessing Empathy of Male Adolescent Sex Offenders

  • Tracey CurwenEmail author
Article
  • 170 Downloads

Abstract

Empathy has been a focus of work with sex offenders; however, there are a limited number of studies supporting this as a deficit. The study investigated the reliability and validity of 3 scales of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI)—Empathic Concern [EC], Perspective-Taking [PT], and Personal Distress [PD]—within a clinical sample. These scales were also used to examine the differences in empathy among groups of sex offenders. One hundred and twenty-three male adolescent sex offenders (ages 12–19) completed a battery of psychometric measures that included the IRI during a sex-offender-specific assessment. Moderate internal consistency and convergent validity was established for IRI scales. Age and social desirability were related to IRI scores. Victim empathy was not related to IRI scores. Justifications and acceptance of sexual and interpersonal violence were negatively correlated to EC and positively correlated to PD. Those who committed violent offenses reported more EC and PT; however, a generally hostile temperament was negatively related to these scales. Group differences were not found when contrasted with respect to a history of sexual or physical victimization or denial. Researchers using the IRI with male adolescent sex offenders should be cautious of the influence of age and socially desirable responding.

adolescent sexual offender Interpersonal Reactivity Index empathy 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Acully, D. (1983). Incarcerated rapist: Exploring a sociological model. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, J. V., Kaplan, M. S., Tenke., C. E., & Tartagalini, A. (1991). The incidence of depressive symptomology in juvenile sex offenders with a history of abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 15, 531–536.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger, A. M., Knutson, J. F., Mehm, J. G., & Perkins, K. A. (1988). The self-report of punitive childhood experiences of young adults and adolescents. Child Abuse and Neglect, 12, 251–262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Biaggio, M., Supplee, K., & Curtis, N. (1981). Reliability and validity of four anger scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 639–648.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bower, M. F., & Knutson, J. F. (1996). Attitudes toward physical discipline as a function of disciplinary history and self-labeling as physically abused. Child Abuse and Neglect, 20, 689–699.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bremer, J. F. (1992). Serious juvenile sex offenders: Treatment and long-term follow-up. Psychiatric Annals, 22, 326–332.Google Scholar
  7. Burke, D. M. (2001). Empathy in sexually offending and nonoffending adolescent males. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 222–233.Google Scholar
  8. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Buss, A. H., & Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 343–349.Google Scholar
  10. Carey, J. C., Fox, E. A., & Spraggins, F. E. (1988). Replication of structure findings regarding the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 21, 102–105.Google Scholar
  11. Chlopan, B. E., McCain, M. L., Carbonell, J. L., & Hagen, R. L. (1985). Empathy: Review of available measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 635–653.Google Scholar
  12. Cicchetti, D. (1989). How research on child maltreatment has informed the study of child development: Perspectives from developmental psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & V. Carlson (Eds.), Child maltreatment: Theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and neglect (pp. 377–431). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, G. E., & Leitenberg, H. (1987). Adolescent sex offenders. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 417–427.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, M. H. (1980). The multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents, 10, 85.Google Scholar
  15. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.Google Scholar
  16. Davis, M. H., & Franzoi, S. (1991). Stability and change in adolescent self-consciousness and empathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 70–87.Google Scholar
  17. Eisenberg, N. (1988). The development of prosocial and aggressive behavior. In M. H. Bornstein & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (pp. 461–495). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. (1987). Empathy, sympathy, and altruism: Empirical and conceptual links. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 292–316). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fehrenbach, P. A., Smith, W., Monastersky, C., & Deisher, R. W. (1986). Adolescent sexual offenders: Offender and offense characteristics. American Journal of Orthopsyciatry, 56, 225–233.Google Scholar
  20. Fernandez, Y. M., Marshall, W. L., Lightbody, S., & O'Sullivan, C. (1999). The Child Molester Empathy Measure: Description and examination of its reliability and validity. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 17–31.Google Scholar
  21. Feshbach, N. D. (1987). Parental empathy and child adjustment/maladjustment. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 271–289). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Feshbach, N. D. (1989). The construct of empathy and the phenomenon of physical maltreatment of children. In D. Cicchetti & V. Carlson (Eds.), Child maltreatment: Theory and research on the causes and consequences of child abuse and neglect (pp. 349–373). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gladstein, G. A. (1983). Understanding empathy: Integrating counseling, developmental, and social psychology perspectives. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 467–482.Google Scholar
  24. Gough, H. G. (1987). California Psychological Inventory: Administrator's guide. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  25. Groth, A. N. (1979). Sexual traumas in the life history of rapists and child molesters. Victimology, 4, 10–16.Google Scholar
  26. Haertzen, C. A., Hickey, J. E., Rose, M. R., & Jaffe, J. H. (1990). The relationship between a diagnosis of antisocial personality and hostility: Development of an antisocial hostility scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 679–686.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hagan, M. P., King, R. P., & Patros, R. L. (1994). Recidivism among adolescent perpetrators of sexual assault against children. In Young victims, young offenders (pp. 127–137). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hanson, R. K., & Scott, H. (1995). Assessing perspective-taking among sexual offenders, nonsexual criminals, and nonoffenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 259–277.Google Scholar
  29. Hanson, R. K., & Slater, S. (1988). Sexual victimization in the history of sexual abusers: A review. Annals of Sex Research, 1, 485–499.Google Scholar
  30. Hayashino, D. S., Wurtele, S. K., & Klebe, K. J. (1995). Child molesters: An examination of cognitive factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 106–116.Google Scholar
  31. Hoffman, M. L. (1987). Empathy: Justice and moral judgement. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 47–80). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hovestadt, A. J., Anderson, W. T., Piercy, F. P., Cochran, S. W., & Fine, M. (1985). A family-of-origin scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 11, 287–297.Google Scholar
  33. Hudson, S. M., Marshall, W. L., Wales, D., McDonald, E., Bakker, L. W., & McLean, A. (1993). Emotional recognition skills of sex offenders. Annals of Sex Research, 6, 199–211.Google Scholar
  34. Ickes, W. (1993). Empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality, 61, 587–609.Google Scholar
  35. Ickes, W., Stinson, L., Bissonnette, V., & Garcia, S. (1990). Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 730–742.Google Scholar
  36. Jenkins-Hall, K. D. (1989). Enhancing offender empathy for sexual-abuse victims. In D. R. Laws (Ed.), Relapse prevention with sex offenders (pp. 236–243). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  37. Jenkins-Hall, K. D., & Marlatt, G. A. (1989). Apparently irrelevant decisions in the relapse process. In D. R. Laws (Ed.), Relapse prevention with sex offenders (pp. 47–55). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  38. Kaufman, K. L., Hilliker, D. R., Lathrop, P., & Daleiden, E. L. (1993). Assessing child sexual offenders' modus operandi: Accuracy in self-reported use of threats and coercion. Annals of Sex Research, 6, 213–229.Google Scholar
  39. Klimes-Dougan, B., & Kistner, J. (1990). Physically abused preschoolers' responses to peers' distress. Developmental Psychology, 26, 599–602.Google Scholar
  40. Lakey, J. (1994). The profile and treatment of male adolescent sex offenders. Adolescence, 29, 755–761.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lane, S. L. (1991). The sexual abuse cycle. In G. D. Ryan & S. L. Lane (Eds.), Juvenile seuxal offending: Causes, consequences, and correction (pp. 103–141). Lexington, MA: Lexington books.Google Scholar
  42. Langevin, R., Wright, P., & Handy, L. (1988). Empathy, assertiveness, aggressiveness, and defensiveness among sex offenders. Annals of Sex Research, 1, 533–547.Google Scholar
  43. Lindsey, R. E., Carlozzi, A. F., & Eells, G. T. (2001). Differences in the dispositional empathy of juvenile sex offenders, non-sex-offending delinquent juveniles, and nondelinquent juveniles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 510–522.Google Scholar
  44. Malamuth, N. M. (1989). The attraction to sexual aggression scale: Part one. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 26–49.Google Scholar
  45. Manley, C. M., Searight, H. R., Binder, A. F., & Russo, R. J. (1990). The Family-of-Origin scale: Factorial validity for adolescents. Family Therapy, 17, 75–82.Google Scholar
  46. Marshall, W. L. (1993). A revised approach to the treatment of men who sexually assault adult females. In G., Nagayama Hall, R. Hirschman, J. Graham, & M. Zaragoza (Eds.), Sexual aggression: Issues in etiology, assessment and treatment (pp. 143–165). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  47. Marshall, W. L., & Barbaree, H. E. (1990). An integrated theory of the etiology of sexual offending. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 257–275). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  48. Marshall, W. L., Hudson, S. M., Jones, R., & Fernandez, Y. M. (1995). Empathy in sex offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 15, 99–113.Google Scholar
  49. McGrath, M., Cann, S., & Konopasky, R. (1998). New measures of defensivenesss, empathy, and cognitive distortions for sexual offenders against children. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 25–36.Google Scholar
  50. Milner, J. S., Halsey, L. B., & Fultz, J. (1995). Empathic responsiveness and affective reactivity to infant stimuli in high-and low-risk for physical child abuse mothers. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19, 767–780.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Monto, M., Zgourides, G., & Harris, R. (1998). Empathy, self-esteem, and the adolescent sexual offender. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10, 127–140.Google Scholar
  52. Monto, M., Zgourides, G., Wilson, J., & Harris, R. (1994). Empathy and adolescent male sex-offenders. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 1598.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Nichols, H. R., & Molinder, I. (1977). Multiphasic Sex Inventory. Taucoma, WA: Authorsurname.Google Scholar
  54. Perry, G., & Orchard, J. (1992). Community based treatment. In Assessment and treatment of adolescent sex offenders (pp. 67–97). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Presssurname.Google Scholar
  55. Pithers, W. (1990). Assessment and modification of cognitive distortions in sex offenders. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 331–361). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  56. Pithers, W. (1993). Treatment of rapists: Reinterpretation of early outcome data and exploratory constructs to enhance therapeutic efficiency. In G. Nagayama Hall, R. Hirschman, J. Graham, & M. Zaragoza (Eds.), Sexual aggression: Issues in etiology, assessment, and treatment (pp. 167–196). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  57. Pithers, W. (1994). Process evaluation of a group therapy component designed to enhance sex offenders' empathy for sexual abuse survivors. Behaviour, Research, and Therapy, 32, 565–570.Google Scholar
  58. Roid, G. H., & Fitts, W. H. (1988). The Tennessee Self-Concept Scale. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  59. Salter, A. (1988). Treating child sex offenders and victims. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Scavo, R., & Buchanan, B. D. (1990). Group therapy for male adolescent sex offenders: A model for residential treatment. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 7, 59–74.Google Scholar
  61. Schudy, K. L., Searight, H. R., Russo, J. R., Rogers, B. J., Manley, C. M., Capps, S. C., et al. (1992). The Family-of-Origin scale for young adolescents: Reliability and preliminary norms. Family Therapy, 16, 123–130.Google Scholar
  62. Scully, D., & Marolla, J. (1984). Convicted rapists' vocabulary of motive: Excuses and justifications. Social Problems, 31, 530–544.Google Scholar
  63. Seghorn, T. K., Prentky, R. A., & Boucher, R. J. (1987). Childhood sexual abuse in the lives of sexually aggressive offenders. Journal of American Academic Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 262–267.Google Scholar
  64. Selby, M. J. (1984). Assessment of violence potential using measures of anger, hostility, and social desirability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 531–544.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Smith, W. R. (1988). Delinquency and abuse among juvenile sexual offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3, 400–413.Google Scholar
  66. Straker, G., & Jacobson, R. S. (1981). Aggression, emotional maladjustment, and empathy in the abused child. Developmental Psychology, 17, 762–765.Google Scholar
  67. Underwood, B., & Moore, B. (1982). Perspective-taking and altruism. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 143–173.Google Scholar
  68. Wieckowski, E., Hartsoe, P., Mayer, A., & Shortz, J. (1998). Deviant sexual behavior in children and young adolescents: Frequency and patterns. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10(4), 293–303.Google Scholar
  69. Wills, L. B. (1993). Introduction: Treatment of sexual aggression. In G. Nagayama Hall, R. Hirschman, J. Graham, & M. Zaragoza (Eds.), Sexual aggression: Issues in etiology, assessment, and treatment (pp. 135–141). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  70. Worling, J. R. (1993). Adolescent male sexual offenders: Individual and family characteristics based on victim's age, gender, and relationship to the offender. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto.Google Scholar
  71. Worling, J. R. (1995a). Adolescent sibling-incest offenders: Differences in family and individual functioning when compared to adolescent nonsibling sex offenders. Child Abuse and Neglect, 19, 633–645.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Worling, J. R. (1995b). Sexual abuse histories of adolescent male sex offenders: Differences on the basis of the age and gender of their victims. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 610–613.Google Scholar
  73. Zahn-Waxler, C., & Radke-Yarrow, M. (1990). The origins of empathic concern. Motivation and Emotion, 14, 107–129.Google Scholar
  74. Zaid, L. Y., Knutson, J. F., & Mehm, J. B. (1989). Transgenerational patterns of abusive parenting: Analog and clinical tests. Aggressive Behavior, 15, 137–152.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SAFE-T (Sexual Abuse: Family, Education, & Treatment) Program, Thistletown RegionalCentre for Children and AdolescentsTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations