Advertisement

Wetlands Ecology and Management

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 243–255 | Cite as

The keystone role of leaf-removing crabs in mangrove forests of North Brazil

  • Dirk Schories
  • Audrey Barletta Bergan
  • Mario Barletta
  • Uwe Krumme
  • Ulf Mehlig
  • Verena Rademaker
Article

Abstract

Principle factors which influence mangroveleaf litter turnover, in particular therole of leaf-removing crabs, were evaluatedin a riverine mangrove site nearBragança (Pará, North Brazil). Ourspecial interest was focussed on the roleof the leaf-removing crab Ucidescordatus. Leaf litter fluxes between themangrove forest and the adjacent estuarywere investigated by estimating the biomassand fate of leaf litter material and propagules. Vegetation is dominated by Rhizophora mangle, with Avicenniagerminans trees, both up to 25 m high,found intermittently. During 1997, Rhizophora trees produced around 1.40 gDW m-2 d-1 of leave fall and0.75 g DW m-2 d-1 of propagules.Leaf decomposition rates on the ground wereabout 0.06 g DW m-2 d-1,irrespective of species, habitat or siteexposure. This amount accounts for <3%of total leaf fall. Average leaf litterbiomass present on the ground was 0.01 gDW m-2 d-1. When the mangroveforest was flooded (on average 10 days permonth) the quantity of leaf litterand propagules washed out with the springtide was 10 and 17 times greater thanduring neap tide. Nevertheless, tidalexport and decomposition together made upless than 39 percent of annual leaf litterfall. The bulk of the remaining amount isapparently removed by Ucides. Eachcrab consumed about 1.30 g DW of leaflitter material and propagules per day.Since the average density of these crabswas 1.38 crabs m-2, it is proposedthat Ucides is a keystone species inBragantinian mangroves.

above ground biomass decomposition tidal export Ucides cordatus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albright, L.J. 1976. In situ degradation of mangrove tissues. NZ J. Marine & Freshw. Res. 10: 385–389.Google Scholar
  2. Barletta, M., Saint-Paul, U., Barletta-Bergan, A., Ekau, W. and Schories, D. 2000. Spatial and temporal distribution of Myrophis punctatus (Ophichtidae) and associated fish fauna in a North Brazilian intertidal mangrove forest. Hydrobiologia 426: 65–74.Google Scholar
  3. Blankensteyn, A., Cunha, D. and Freire, A.S. 1997. Distribution, fisheries and proteinic content of the mangrove crab Ucides cordatus (L. 1763) (Brachyura: Ocypodidae) in the Laranjetras Bay and adjacent areas, Parana, Brazil. Arquivos de Biologia e Tecnologia 40(2): 331–349.Google Scholar
  4. Boonruang, P. 1984. The rate of degradation of mangrove leaves, Rhizophora apiculata B.L. and Avicennia marina (Forsk) Vierh. at Phuket Island, Western Peninsula of Thailand. Proceedings of the Asian Symposium on Mangrove Environment: Research and Management, University of Malaysia and UNESCO, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
  5. Boto, K.G. and Bunt, J.S. 1981. Tidal export of particulate organic matter from a northern Australian mangrove system. Est. Coast. & Shelf Sci. 13: 247–255.Google Scholar
  6. Branco, J. 1993. Bioecological aspects of Ucides cordatus (Linnaeus, 1763) (Crustacea, Decapoda) from Itacorubi mangrove, SC, Brazil. Arquivos de Biologia e Tecnologia 36(1): 133–148.Google Scholar
  7. Bunt, J.S. 1979. Studies of mangrove litter fall in tropical Australia. Mangrove ecosystems in Australia. Structure, function and management. In: Australian Institute ofMarine Science, Proceedings of the Australian National Mangrove Workshop, Cape Ferguson, pp. 223–237.Google Scholar
  8. Cintrón, G. and Schaeffer-Novelli, Y. 1984. Methods for studying mangrove structure. In: Snedaker, S.C. and Snedaker, J.G. (eds.), The Mangrove Ecosystem – Research Methods. pp. 91–113. UNESCO, Bungay.Google Scholar
  9. Goulter, P.F.E. and Allaway, W.G. 1979. Litter fall and decomposition in a mangrove stand, Avicennia marina (Forsk) Vierh. in Middle Harbour, Sydney. Aust. J. Marine & Freshw. Res. 30: 541–546.Google Scholar
  10. Heald, E.J. 1971. The production of organic detritus in a south Florida estuary. Sea Grant Technical Bulletin, University of Miami Sea Grant Program (Living Resources), Miami, Florida, pp. 1–110.Google Scholar
  11. Jayasekera, R. 1991. Chemical composition of the mangrove, Rhizophora mangle L. J. plant physiol. 138: 119–121.Google Scholar
  12. Kjerfve, B. and Lacerda, L.D. 1990. Mangroves of Brazil. Marine Biol.: 245–272.Google Scholar
  13. McKee, K.L. 1995. Mangrove species distribution and propagule predation in Belize. An exception to the dominance predation hypothesis. Biotropica 27(3): 334–345.Google Scholar
  14. Micheli, F. 1993. Effect of mangrove litter species and availability on survival, moulting, and reproduction of the mangrove crab Sesarma messa. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 171(2): 149–163.Google Scholar
  15. Ovalle, A.R.C., Rezende, C.E., Lacerda, L.D. and Silva, C.A.R. 1990. Factors affecting the hydrochemistry of a mangrove tidal creek, Sepetiba Bay, Brazil. Est. Coast. & Shelf Sci. 31(5): 639–650.Google Scholar
  16. Rezende, C.E., Lacerda, L.D., Ovalle, A.R.C., Silva, C.A.R. and Martinelli, L.A. 1990. Nature of POC transport in a mangrove ecosystem: A carbon stable isotopic study. Est. Coast. & Shelf Sci. 30(6): 641–645.Google Scholar
  17. Robertson, A.I. 1986. Leaf-burying crabs: their influence on energy flow and export from a mangrove forest (Rhizophora spp.) in northeastern Australia. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. & Ecol. 102: 237–248.Google Scholar
  18. Robertson, A.I. 1988. Decomposition of mangrove leaf litter in tropical Australia. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. & Ecol. 116(3): 235–247.Google Scholar
  19. Robertson, A.I. and Daniel, P.A. 1989. Decomposition and the annual flux of detritus from fallen timber in tropical mangrove forests. Limnol. & Oceanogr. 34(3): 640–646.Google Scholar
  20. Robertson, A.I., Alongi, D.M. and Boto, K.G. 1992. Food chains and carbon fluxes. In: Alongi, D. and Robertson, A. (eds.), Tropical Mangrove Ecosystems, Coastal and estuarine studies No. 41, pp. 295–323 American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, T.J., III 1987a. Effects of seed predators and light level on the distribution of Avicennia marina (Forsk.) Vierh. in tropical, tidal forests. Est. Coast. & Shelf Sci. 25: 43–51.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, T.J., III 1987b. Seed predation in relation to tree dominance and distribution in mangrove forests. Ecology 68(2): 266–273.Google Scholar
  23. Twilley, R.R. 1985. The exchange of organic carbon in basin mangrove forests in a southwest Florida estuary. Est. Coast. & Shelf Sci. 20: 543–557.Google Scholar
  24. Twilley, R.R. 1997. Litter dynamics in riverine mangrove forests in the Guayas River estuary, Ecuador. Oecologia 111(1): 109–122.Google Scholar
  25. Underwood, A.J. 1997. Experiments in Ecology. Cambridge University Press, 544 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Valk, A.G.V.d. and Attiwill, P.M. 1984. Decomposition of leaf and root litter of Avicennia marina at Westernport Bay, Victoria, Australia. Aq. Botany 18(3): 205–221.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk Schories
    • 1
  • Audrey Barletta Bergan
    • 2
  • Mario Barletta
    • 2
  • Uwe Krumme
    • 1
  • Ulf Mehlig
    • 1
  • Verena Rademaker
    • 1
  1. 1.Thetis IBNHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Center for Tropical Marine EcologyBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations