Human Physiology

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 492–497

Physiological Mechanisms of the Effectiveness of Bilateral Stereotactic Cingulotomy against Strong Psychological Dependence in Drug Addicts

  • S. V. Medvedev
  • A. D. Anichkov
  • Yu. I. Polyakov
Article

Abstract

It is now generally believed that psychological dependence in drug addicts is determined not only socially, but also physiologically. At the Institute of the Human Brain (Russian Academy of Sciences), bilateral stereotactic cryocingulotomy has been used for treatment of drug addiction since 1998. To date, the surgery has been performed on 348 patients, which has made it possible to study long-term consequences of the surgery, perform the necessary psychological studies, and summarize the results. Interviewing of 187 patients with catamneses of more than two years has shown that 45% of them have entirely abstained from addictive drugs after the surgery and 17% have entirely abstained from drugs for more than two years after one or two instances of drug-taking within the first two months after the surgery; there are no data on 13% of the patients. The remaining patients exhibit either a partial improvement (they have found at least temporary work and have decreased the drug dosage and the frequency of intake) or show no change (13 and 12% of the cases, respectively). The results of catamnestic study have demonstrated that the surgery is effective against heroinism and rarely causes complications. Apparently, the physiological mechanism of the therapeutic effect is the suppression of the mechanism of error detection. The duration of the resultant destabilization may vary depending on the individual characteristics of the patient and environmental factors. Therefore, this period should be included in the duration of treatment and patients must follow the rehabilitation regimen.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Rukovodstvo po narkologii (Narcology Manual), Ivanets, N.N., Ed., Moscow: Medpraktika, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anokhina, I.P., Vertinskaya, A.G., Vasil'eva, G.N., and Ovchinnikov, I.V., On the Common Biological Mechanisms of Individual Predisposition to Abuse of Various Psychoactive Drugs, Fiziol. Chel., 2000, vol. 26, no. 6, p. 74.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Papez, J.W., A Proposed Mechanism of Emotion, Arch. Neurol. Psychiatr., 1937, vol. 38, p. 725.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shustin, V.A., Vovin, R.Ya., and Korzenev, A.V., Khirurgicheskaya korrektsiya nekotorykh psikhopatologicheskikh rasstroistv (Surgical Correction of Some Psychopathological Disorders), St. Petersburg, 1997, p. 34.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fulton, J.F., Frontal Lobotomy and Affective Behavior: A Neurophysiological Analysis, New York: Norton, 1951.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Le Beau, J., Anterior Cingulotomy in Man, J. Neuro-surg., 1954, vol. 11, p. 268.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kandel', E.A., Funktsional'naya i stereotaksicheskaya neirokhirurgiya (Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgery), Moscow: Meditsina, 1981.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ballantine, H.T. and Jiriunas, I.E., Treatment of Intractable Psychiatric Illness and Chronic Pain by Stereotactic Cingulotomy, in Operative Neurosurgical Techniques, London, 1987, p. 1069.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spangler, W.J., Cosgrove, G.R., Ballantine, H.T., et al., Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Stereotactic Cingulotomy for Intractable Psychiatric Disease, Neurosurgery, 1996, vol. 38, no. 6, p. 107.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cosgrove, G.R. and Rauch, S.L., Psychosurgery: Functional and Stereotactic Neurosurgery, MGH, 1999. (http://neurosurgery.mgh.harvard.edu/psysurg.htm).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Devinsky, O., Vorrell, M.J., and Vogt, B., Contributions of Anterior Cingulate Cortex to Behavior, Brain, 1995, vol. 118, p. 279.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anichkov, A.D., Nikitin, M.A., Polonskii, Yu.Z., et al., A New Universal Stereotactic System, in Aktual'nye voprosy stereoneirokhirurgii epilepsii (Topical Problems of the Stereoneurosurgery of Epilepsy), St. Petersburg: RNIIN im. Prof. A.L. Polenova, 1993, p. 177.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Uthman, B.M., Wilder, B.J., Penry, J.K., and Dean, C., Treatment of Epilepsy by Stimulation of the Vagus Nerve, Neurology, 1993, vol. 43, p. 1338.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Orellana, C., Controversy over Brain Surgery for Heroin Addiction in Russia, Lancet: Neurology, 2002, vol. 1, p. 333.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shabanov, P.D. and Shtakel'berg, O.Yu., Narkomanii: patopsikhologiya, klinika, reabilitatsiya (Drug Addiction: Pathopsychology, Clinical Progress, and Rehabilitation), Grinenko, A.Ya., Ed., St. Petersburg: Lan', 2000.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Abbott, A., Brain Implants Show Promise against Obsessive Disorder, Nature, 2002, vol. 419, p. 658.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kryzhanovskii, G.N., The General Theory of Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Neurological and Psychopathological Syndromes, Zh. Nevrol. Psikhiatr. im. S.S. Korsakova, 2002, vol. 102, no. 11, p. 4.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bechtereva, N.P. and Gretchin, V.B., Neurophysiological Foundations of Mental Activity, Int. Rev. Neurobiol., 1968, vol. 11, p. 329.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Naatanen, R., Attention and Brain Function, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1992.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carter, C.S., Braver, T.S., Barsh, D.M., et al., Anterior Cingulate Cortex, Error Detection, and the Online Monitoring of Performance, Science, 1998, vol. 280, p. 747.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. V. Medvedev
    • 1
  • A. D. Anichkov
    • 1
  • Yu. I. Polyakov
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations