Advertisement

Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 259–284 | Cite as

The Voice of Deception: Vocal Strategies of Naive and Able Liars

  • Luigi Anolli
  • Rita Ciceri
Article

Abstract

The aim of this research was to analyze the main vocal cues and strategies used by a liar. 31 male university students were asked to raise doubts in an expert in law about a picture. The subjects were required to describe the picture in three experimental conditions: telling the truth (T) and lying to a speaker when acquiescent (L1) and when suspicious (L2). The utterances were then subjected to a digitized acoustic analysis in order to measure nonverbal vocal variables. Verbal variables were also analyzed (number of words, eloquency and disfluency index). Results showed that deception provoked an increment in F0, a greater number of pauses and words, and higher eloquency and fluency indexes. The F0 related to the two types of lie—prepared and unprepared—identified three classes of liars: good liars, tense liars (more numerous in L1), and overcontrolled liars (more numerous in L2). It is argued that these differences are correlated to the complex task of lying and the need to control one's emotions during deception. The liar's effort to control his/her voice, however, can lead to his/her tone being overcontrolled or totally lacking in control (leakage). Finally, the research forwards an explanation on the strategies used by the good liar and in particular treats the self-deception hypothesis.

Keywords

Social Psychology Complex Task Verbal Variable Acoustic Analysis Vocal Variable 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anolli, L., & Balconi, M. (in press). Mentire con le parole: analisi degli indicatori verbali micro e macro strutturali. Archivio di Psicologìa Neurologia e Psichiatria.Google Scholar
  2. Anolli, L., & Ciceri, R. (1992). La voce delle emozioni. Milano: Angeli.Google Scholar
  3. Anolli, L., Balconi, M., & Ciceri, R. (1994). Fenomenologia del mentire: aspetti semantici e psicologici della menzogna. Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria, 1–2, 268–295.Google Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F. (1993). Lying to yourself: The enigma of self-deception. In M. Lewis & C. Saarni (Eds.), Lying and deception in everyday life (pp. 166–183). New York: the Guilford press.Google Scholar
  5. Bavelas, J. B., Black, A., Chovil, N., & Mullet, J. (Eds.). (1990). Equivocal communication. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, C. R., & Jordan, J. M. (1992). Planning sources, planning difficulty and verbal fluency. Communication Monographs, 59, 130–149.Google Scholar
  7. Bezooijen, R. van (1984). Characteristics and recognizability of vocal expression of emotion. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Boudon, R. (1990) L'art de se persuader des idées fausses, fragiles ou douteuses. Paris: Libraire Arthème Fayard.Google Scholar
  9. Buller, D. B., & Aune, R. K. (1987). Nonverbal cues to deception among intimates, friends, and strangers. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 269–290.Google Scholar
  10. Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1994). Deception: Strategic and nonstrategic communication. In J. A. Daly, & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 191–223). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Buller, D. B., Burgoon, G. K., Guerrero, L. K., Afifi, W., & Feldman, C. M. (1996). Interpersonal deception: XII. Information management dimensions underlying types of deceptive messages. Communication Monographs, 63, 50–69.Google Scholar
  12. Buller, D. B., Burgoon, G. K., White, C. H., & Ebesu, A. S. (1994). Interpersonal deception: VII. Behavioral profiles of falsification, equivocation and concealment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 366–395.Google Scholar
  13. Ciceri, R. (1995). La menzogna come atto comunicativo. Analisi degli indizi e delle strategie vocali soprasegmentali dell'ingenuo e dell'abile mentitore. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pavia, Italy.Google Scholar
  14. Cody, M. J., Marston, P. J., & Foster, M. (1984). Deception: Paralinguistic and verbal leakage. In R. N. Bostrom & B. H. Westley (Eds.), Communication Yearbook 8 (pp. 464–490). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Coleman, L., & Kay P. (1981). Prototype semantics: The English word ‘lie’. Language, 57, 26–44.Google Scholar
  16. DeTurck, M. A., & Miller, G. R. (1985). Deception and arousal: Isolating the behavioral correlates of deception. Human Communication Research, 12, 181–201.Google Scholar
  17. van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1985). Handbook of discourse analysis (4 vols.). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ebesu, A. S., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Verbal and nonverbal behavior as a function of deception type. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 418–443.Google Scholar
  19. Ekman, P. (1985). Telling lies. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  20. Ekman, P., & Frank, M. G. (1993). Lies that fail. In M. Lewis & C. Saarni (Eds.), Lying and deception in everyday life (pp. 183–200). New York: the Guilford press.Google Scholar
  21. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry, 32, 88–106.Google Scholar
  22. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1974). Detecting deception from the body or face. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 288–298.Google Scholar
  23. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V., O'Sullivan, M., & Scherer, K. R. (1980). Relative importance of face, body and speech in the judgments of personality and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 270–277.Google Scholar
  24. Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Scherer, K. R. (1976). Body movement and voice pitch in deceptive interaction. Semiotica, 16, 23–27.Google Scholar
  25. Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., Friesen, W. V., & Scherer, K. R. (1991). Face, voice and body in detecting deceit. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 125–135.Google Scholar
  26. Ferrero, F. E. (1986). Elementi di fisica acustica. In F. E. Ferrero & E. Caldognetto (Eds.), Aspetti fonetici della comunicazione (pp. 127–153). Padova: Garangola.Google Scholar
  27. Fry, D. B. (1986). Fonetica percettiva. In F. E. Ferrero & E. Caldognetto (Eds.), Aspetti fonetici della comunicazione (pp. 197–226). Padova: Garangola.Google Scholar
  28. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
  29. Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kuiken, D. (1981). Nonimmediate language style and inconsistency between private and expressed evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 183–196.Google Scholar
  31. Longo, L. C., & Ashmore, R. D. (1995). The looks-personality relationship: Global self orientations as shared precursors of subjective physical attractiveness and self ascribed traits. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 371–398.Google Scholar
  32. Maxwell, S. E. (1961). Analyzing qualitative data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  33. McClintock, C. C. (1975). Nonverbal indicators of affect and deception in an interview setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 54–67.Google Scholar
  34. McCornack, S. A. (1992). Information manipulation theory. Communication Monographs, 59, 1–29.Google Scholar
  35. O'Hair, H. D., Cody, M. J., & Mc Laughlin, M. L. (1981). Prepared lies, spontaneous lies, Machiavellianism, and nonverbal communication. Human Communication Research, 15, 312–352.Google Scholar
  36. Reboul, A. (1994). The description of lies in speech acts theory. In H. Perret (Ed.), Pretending to communicate (pp. 292–298). Berlin-New York: De Gruyter & Co.Google Scholar
  37. Riggio, R. E., & Friedman, H. S. (1983). Individual differences and cues to deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 899–915.Google Scholar
  38. Riggio, R. E., Tucker, J., & Throckmorton, B. (1987). Social skills and deception ability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 568–577.Google Scholar
  39. Rochester, S. R. (1973). The significance of pauses in spontaneous speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 51–81.Google Scholar
  40. Schachter, S., Christenfeld, N., Ravina, B., & Bilous, F. (1991). Speech disfluency and the structure of knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 362–367.Google Scholar
  41. Scherer, K. R. (1979). Nonlinguistic vocal indicators of emotion and psychopathology. In C. E. Izard (Ed.), Emotion in personality and psychopathology (pp. 493–529). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  42. Scherer, K. R. (1981). Vocal indicators of stress. In J. Darby (Ed.), Speech evaluation in psychiatry (pp. 171–187). New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
  43. Scherer, K. R., Feldstein, S., Bond, R. N., & Rosenthal, R. (1985). Vocal cues To deception: A comparative channel approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 14, 409–425.Google Scholar
  44. Scherer, K. R., Wallbott, H. G., Tolkmitt, F. J., & Bergmann, G. (Eds.). (1985). Die Stressreaktion: Physiologie und Verhalten. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  45. Searle, J. R. (Ed.) (1979). Expression and the meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Streeter, L. A., Krauss, R. M., Geller, V., & Olson, C. (1977). Pitch changes during attempted deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 345–350.Google Scholar
  47. Sweetser, E. E. (Ed.). (1987). The definition of lie: Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Vrij, A. (1995). The impact of information and setting on detecting of deception by police detectives. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 117–136.Google Scholar
  49. Williams, C. E., & Stevens, K. N. (1972). Emotion and speech: Some acoustical correlates. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 52, 1238–1250.Google Scholar
  50. Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communications of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 14 (pp. 1–59). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  51. Zuckerman, M., & Driver, R. E. (1985). Telling lies: Verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception. In A.W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 129–148). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luigi Anolli
    • 1
  • Rita Ciceri
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro di Psicologia della ComunicazioneUniversità CattolicaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations