Law and Human Behavior

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 635–659 | Cite as

Recidivism Rates Among Child Molesters and Rapists: A Methodological Analysis

  • Robert A. Prentky
  • Austin F. S. Lee
  • Raymond A. Knight
  • David Cerce
Article

Abstract

We address the high variability in sex offender recidivism rates by examining several of the critical methodological differences that underlie this variability. We used a dataset on 251 sex offenders (136 rapists and 115 child molesters) who were discharged over a 25-year period to examine changes in recidivism as a function of changes in dispositional definition of reoffense (e.g., arrest or conviction), changes in the domain of criminal offenses that are considered, and changes in the length of exposure time. The data indicate that: (a) both rapists and child molesters remain at risk to reoffend long after their discharge, in some cases 15–20 years after discharge; (b) there was a marked underestimation of recidivism when calculating a simple proportion (%) consisting of those who were known to have reoffended during the follow-up period, and (c) there was a marked underestimation of recidivism when the criterion was based on conviction or imprisonment. Forensic, clinical and policy implications of this high variability are discussed.

Keywords

Exposure Time Social Psychology High Variability Policy Implication Methodological Difference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Barbaree, H. E. (1996, November). Evaluating the efficacy of sex offender treatment: Realistic and constructive alternatives to optimism and pessimism. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  2. Christiansen, K. O., Elers-Nielsen, M., Le Maire, L., & Sturup, G. K. (1965). Recidivism among sexual offenders. In K. O. Christiansen (Ed.), Scandinavian studies in criminology (pp. 55–85). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  3. Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 34, 187–220.Google Scholar
  4. Furby, L., Weinrott, M. R., & Blackshaw, L. (1989). Sex offender recidivism: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 3–30.Google Scholar
  5. Gibbens, T. C. N., Soothill, K. L., & Way, C. K. (1978). Sibling and parent-child incest offenses. British Journal of Criminology, 18, 40–52.Google Scholar
  6. Grubin, D., & Prentky, R. A. (1993). Sexual psychopathy laws. Criminal Behavior, and Mental Health, 3, 381–392.Google Scholar
  7. Hall, G. C. N., & Proctor, W. C. (1987). Criminological predictors of recidivism in a sexual offender population. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 111–112.Google Scholar
  8. Hanson, R. K., & Bussiere, M. T. (1996). Predictors of sexual offender recidivism: A meta-analysis (Public Works and Government Services Document, Cat. No. JS4-1/1996-4E). Ottawa: Ministry of the Solicitor General of Canada.Google Scholar
  9. Hanson, R. K., Scott, H., & Steffy, R. A. (1995). A comparison of child molesters and nonsexual criminals: Risk predictors and long-term recidivism. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, 325–337.Google Scholar
  10. Hanson, R. K., Steffy, R. A., & Gauthier R. (1993). Long-term recidivism of child molesters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 646–652.Google Scholar
  11. Harris, C. M., Kaylan, A. R., & Maltz, M. D. (1981). Recent advances in the statistics of recidivism measurement. In J. A. Fox (Ed.), Models in quantitative criminology (pp. 61–79). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Harris, C. M., & Moitra, S. (1978). Improved statistical techniques for the measurement of recidivism. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 15, 194–213.Google Scholar
  13. Jenkins, W. O., Barton, M. C., de Valera, E. K., DeVine, M. D., Witherspoon, A. D., & Muller, J. B. (1972). The measurement and prediction of criminal behavior and recidivism: The environmental deprivation scale (EDS) and the maladaptive behavior record (MBR) (Rehabilitation Research Foundation, Contract No. 82-01-69-06, Manpower Administrations). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
  14. Jenkins, W. O., DeVine, M. D., de Valera, E. K., Muller, J. B., Nichols, W. C., & Ray, S. O. (1975). The behavioral demography of the young adult male offender (Rehabilitation Research Foundation, Manpower Administration). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
  15. Klein, S. P., & Caggiano, M. N. (1986). The prevalence, predictability, and policy implications of recidivism. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  16. Knight, R. A. (1992). The generation and corroboration of a taxonomic model for child molesters. In W. O'Donohue & J. H. Geer (Eds.), The sexual abuse of children: Theory, research, and therapy (Vol. 2, pp. 24–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Knight, R. A. (in press). Validation of a typology for rapists. In W. L. Marshall & J. Frenken (Eds.), Sex offender research and treatment: State-of-the-art in North America and Europe. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Knight, R. A., & Prentky, R. A. (1996, August). A twenty-five year follow-up of rapists and child molesters. Symposium presented at the meeting of the XXVIth meeting of the International Congress of Psychology, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  19. Maltz, M. D. (1984). Recidivism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Marques, J. K., Day, D. M., Nelson, C., & West, M. A. (1993). Findings and recommendations from California's experimental treatment program. In G. C. N. Hall, R. Hirschman, J. R. Graham, & M. S. Zaragoza (Eds.), Sexual aggression: Issues in etiology, assessment, and treatment (pp. 197–214). Washington, D.C.: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, D. (1984). A survey of recidivism research in the United States and Canada (Publication #13709). Massachusetts Department of Correction.Google Scholar
  22. Pithers, W. (1990). Relapse prevention with sexual aggressors. In W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws, & H. E. Barbaree (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault (pp. 343–361). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  23. Prentky, R. A. (1990). Sexual violence. Review Commissioned by the Panel on the Understanding and Control of Violent Behavior, Committee on Law and Justice, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  24. Prentky, R. A., & Burgess, A. W. (1990). Rehabilitation of child molesters: A cost-benefit analysis. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 60, 108–117.Google Scholar
  25. Prentky, R. A., & Knight, R. A. (1991). Identifying critical dimensions for discriminating among rapists. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 643–661.Google Scholar
  26. Prentky, R. A., Knight, R. A., & Lee, A. S. (1997). Risk factors associated with recidivism among extrafamilial child molesters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 141–149.Google Scholar
  27. Prentky, R. A., Knight, R. A., Lee, A. S., & Cerce, D. D. (1995). Predictive validity of lifestyle impulsivity for rapists. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 106–128.Google Scholar
  28. Quinsey, V. L. (1981). The long-term management of the mentally abnormal offender. In S. J. Hucker, C. D. Webster, & M. Bar-Aron (Eds.), Mental disorder and criminal responsibility (pp. 137–155). Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  29. Quinsey, V. L., Lalumiere, M. L., Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995a). Predicting sexual offenses. In J. C. Campbell (Ed.), Assessing dangerousness: Violence by sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers (pp. 114–137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Quinsey, V. L., Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1995b). Actuarial prediction of sexual recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 85–105.Google Scholar
  31. Rice, M. E. (1997). Violent offender research and implications for the criminal justice system. American Psychologist, 52, 414–423.Google Scholar
  32. Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1997). Cross-validation and extension of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide for child molesters and rapists. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 231–241.Google Scholar
  33. Rice, M. E., Harris, G. T., & Quinsey, V. L. (1990). A follow-up of rapists assessed in a maximum security psychiatric facility. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 435–448.Google Scholar
  34. Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., & Harris, G. T. (1991). Sexual recidivism among child molesters released from a maximum security psychiatric institution. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 381–386.Google Scholar
  35. Romero, J. J., & Meyer-Williams, L. M. (1985). Recidivism among convicted sex offenders: A 10-year follow-up study. Federal Probation, 49, 58–64.Google Scholar
  36. Schmidt, P., & Witte, A. D. (1988). Predicting recidivism using survival models. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  37. Soothill, K. L., & Gibbens, T. C. N. (1978). Recidivism of sexual offenders: A reappraisal. British Journal of Criminology, 18, 267–276.Google Scholar
  38. Soothill, K. L., Jack, A., & Gibbens, T. C. N. (1976). Rape: A 22-year cohort study. Medicine, Science and Law, 16, 62–69.Google Scholar
  39. Tracy, F., Donnelly, H., Morgenbesser, L., & MacDonald, D. (1983). Program evaluation: Recidivism research involving sex offenders. In J. G. Greer & I. R. Stuart (Eds.), The sexual aggressor (pp. 198–213). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  40. Waldo, G., & Griswold, D. (1979). Issues in the measurement of recidivism. In L. Sechrest, S. O. White, & E. D. Brown (Eds.), The rehabilitation of criminal offenders: Problems and prospects (pp. 225–250). Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  41. Weiner, B. A. (1985). Legal issues raised in treating sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 3, 325–340.Google Scholar
  42. Witt, P. H., DelRusso, J., Oppenheim, J., & Ferguson, G. (1996). Sex offender risk assessment and the law. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 1996, 343–377.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert A. Prentky
    • 1
    • 2
  • Austin F. S. Lee
    • 3
  • Raymond A. Knight
    • 4
  • David Cerce
    • 4
  1. 1.Justice Resource InstituteBridgewater
  2. 2.Joseph J. Peters InstitutePhiladelphia
  3. 3.Department of MathematicsBoston UniversityBoston
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyBrandeis UniversityWaltham

Personalised recommendations