Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 253, Issue 2, pp 287–292 | Cite as

Mycorrhizal colonisation improves fruit yield and water use efficiency in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Thunb.) grown under well-watered and water-stressed conditions

  • C. Kaya
  • D. HiggsEmail author
  • H. Kirnak
  • I. Tas
Article

Abstract

The effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonisation by Glomus clarum on fruit yield and water use efficiency (WUE) was evaluated in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) cv. Crimson Sweet F1 under field conditions. Treatments were: (1) well-watered plants without mycorrhizae (WW-M), (2) well-watered plants with mycorrhizae (WW+M), (3) water- stressed plants without mycorrhizae (WS-M) and (4) water-stressed plants with mycorrhizae (WS+M). When soil water tension readings reached −20 and −50 kPa for well-watered (WW) and water-stressed (WS) treatments, respectively, irrigation was initiated to restore the top soil to near field capacity. Water stress reduced watermelon shoot and root dry matter, fruit yield, water use efficiency but not total soluble solids (TSS) in the fruit, compared with the non-stressed treatments. Mycorrhizal plants had significantly higher biomass and fruit yield compared to nonmycorrhizal plants, whether plants were water stressed or not. AM colonisation increased WUE in both WW and WS plants. Macro- (N, P, K, Ca and Mg) and micro- (Zn, Fe and Mn) nutrient concentrations in the leaves were significantly reduced by water stress. Mycorrhizal colonisation of WS plants restored leaf nutrient concentrations to levels in WW plants in most cases. This is the first report of the mitigation of the adverse effect of water stress on yield and quality of a fruit crop.

Glomus clarum drought mycorrhizae water stress watermelon water use efficiency yield 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdul-Baki A, Spence C and Hoover R (1992) Black polyethylene mulch doubled yield of fresh-market field tomatoes. HortScience 27, 787–789.Google Scholar
  2. Allen M F 1982 Influence of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae on water movement through Bouteloua gracilis (H.B.K.) Lag ex Steud. New Phytol. 91, 191–196.Google Scholar
  3. Auge R M, Schekel K A and Wample R L 1986 Greater leaf conductance of well-watered VA mycorrhizal rose plants is not related to phosphorus nutrition. New Phytol. 103, 107–116.Google Scholar
  4. Aydemir S 2001 Properties of palygorskite-influenced vertisols and vertic-like soils in the Harran plain of South-eastern Turkey. PhD. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Bolan N S 1991 A critical review on the role of mycorrhizal fungi in the uptake of phosphorus by plants. Plant Soil, 134, 187–207.Google Scholar
  6. Bryla D R and Duniway J M 1997a Effects of mycorrhizal infection on drought tolerance and recovery in safflower and wheat. Plant Soil 197, 95–103.Google Scholar
  7. Bryla D R and Duniway J M 1997b. Growth, phosphorus uptake, and water relations of safflower and wheat infected with an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. New Phytol. 136, 581–590.Google Scholar
  8. Chapman H D and Pratt P F 1982 Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants and Water. pp. 60–193, Chapman Pub., Riverside, California.Google Scholar
  9. Chartzoulakis K Noitsakis B and Therios I 1993 Photosynthesis, plant growth and dry matter distribution in kiwifruit as influenced by water deficits. Irr. Sci. 14, 1–5.Google Scholar
  10. Clark R B 1997 Arbuscular mycorrhizal adaptation, spore germination, root colonisation and host plant growth and mineral acqusition at low pH. Plant Soil, 192, 15–22.Google Scholar
  11. Davies F T, Svenson S E, Henderson J C, Phavaphutanon L, Duray S A, OlaldePortugal V, Meier C E and Bo S H 1996 Non-nutritional stress acclimation of mycorrhizal woody plants exposed to drought. Tree Physiol. 16, 985–993.Google Scholar
  12. Duffy E M and Cassells A C 2000. The effect of inoculation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) microplants with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on tuber yield and tuber size distribution. Appl. Soil Ecol. 15, 137–144.Google Scholar
  13. Egilla J N, Davies F T and Drew M C 2001 Effect of potassium on drought resistance of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis cv. Leprechaun: plant growth, leaf macro-and micronutrient content and root longevity. Plant Soil 229, 213–224.Google Scholar
  14. Faber B A, Zasoski R J, Munns D N and Shackel K 1991. A method for measuring hyphal nutrient and water uptake in mycorrhizal plants. Can. J. Bot. 69, 87–94.Google Scholar
  15. Figueiredo M V B, Villar H A, Burity H A and de França F P 1999 Alleviation of water stress effects in cowpea by Bradyrhizobium spp. inoculatin. Plant Soil, 207, 67–75.Google Scholar
  16. Fitter A H 1988 Water relations of red clover Trifolium pratanse L. as affected by VA mycorrhizal infection and phosphorus supply before and during drought. J. Exp. Bot. 39, 595–603.Google Scholar
  17. Graham J H, Syvertsten J P and Smith M L 1987 Water relations of mycorrhizal and phosphorus-fertilised non mycorrhizal Citrus under drought stress. New Phytol. 105, 411–419.Google Scholar
  18. Gutierez-Boem F H and Thomas G W 1999 Phosphorus nutrition and water deficits in field-grown soybeans. Plant Soil, 207, 87–96.Google Scholar
  19. Hardeman T L, Taber H G and Cox D F 1999 Trickle irrigation of vegetables: water conservation without yield reduction. J. Veg. Crop Prod. 5, 23–33.Google Scholar
  20. Henderson J C and Davies F T 1990 Drought acclimation and the morphology of mycorrhizal Rosa hybrida L. cv. Ferdy is independent of leaf elemental content. New Phytol. 115, 503–510.Google Scholar
  21. Huang X, Huang H and Gao F 2000 The growth potential generated in citrus fruit under water stress and its relevant mechanisms. Sci. Hort. 83, 227–240.Google Scholar
  22. Jakobsen I 1995 Transport of phosphorus and carbon in VA mycorrhizas. In Mycorrhiza: Structure, Function, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology. Eds. A Varma and B. Hock. pp. 297–324. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  23. Kaya C and Higgs D 2002 Response of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) cultivars to foliar application of zinc when grown in sand culture at low zinc. Sci. Hort. 93, 53–64.Google Scholar
  24. Kirnak H, Kaya C, Higgs D and Gercek S 2001 A long-term experiment to study the role of mulches in physiology and macro-nutrition of strawberry grown under water stress. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 52, 937–943.Google Scholar
  25. Kothari S K Marschner H and George E 1990 Effect of VA mycorrhizal fungi and rhizophere microorganisms on root and shoot morphology, growth and water relations in maize. New Phytol. 116, 303–311.Google Scholar
  26. Kramer P J and Boyer J S 1995 Water Relations of Plants and Soils. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  27. Marschner H and Dell B 1994 Nutrient uptake in mycorrhizal symposis. Plant Soil, 159, 89–102.Google Scholar
  28. McGonigle T P, Miller M H, Evans D G, Fairchild DL and Swan GA 1990 A new method which gives an objective measure of colonisation of roots by vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 115, 495–501.Google Scholar
  29. Nagel D 1995 Commercial production of bell peppers in Mississippi. Miss. State Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv. Information sheet, No: 1516, Starkville, MS.Google Scholar
  30. Nelson C E and Safir G R 1982 Increased drought tolerance of mycorrhizal onion plants caused by improved phosphorus nutrition. Planta 154, 407–413.Google Scholar
  31. Ortas I, Ortakci D and Kaya Z 2002 Mycorrhizal dependency of sour orange in relation to phosphorus and zinc nutrition. J. Plant Nutr. 25 (6), 1263–1279.Google Scholar
  32. Persad-Chinnery S B and Chinnery L E 1996 Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae and micronutrient nutrition. In Advancement in Micronutrient Research. Ed. A Hemantaranjan. pp. 367–382. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, India.Google Scholar
  33. Rufykiri G, Declerck S, Dufey J E and Delvaux B 2000 Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi might alleviate aluminium toxicity in banana plants. New Phytol. 148, 343–352.Google Scholar
  34. Sangakkara U R, Hartwig U A and Nosberger J 1996 Root shoot development of French beans as affected by soil moisture and fertiliser potassium. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 177, 145–151.Google Scholar
  35. Sangakkara U R, Frehner M and Nosberger J 2000 Effect of soil moisture and potassium fertilizer on shoot water potential, photosynthesis and partitioning of carbon in mungbean and cowpea. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 185, 201–207.Google Scholar
  36. Smajstrla A G 2000 Irrigation scheduling and management. Citr. Veg. Mag. March, 1–4.Google Scholar
  37. Smith S E and Read D J 1997 Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Smittle D A, Dickens W L and Stansell J R 1994 Irrigation regimes affect yield and water use by bell pepper. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci, 119, 936–939.Google Scholar
  39. Wierenga P J and Saddiq M H 1985 Optimum soil water tension for trickle irrigated chilli peppers. Proc. Third Int. Drip/Trickle Congress, 1, 93–197, ASAE, CAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Agriculture Faculty, Soil Science and Plant Nutrition DepartmentUniversity of HarranSanliurfaTurkey
  2. 2.Environmental SciencesUniversity of HertfordshireHatfield, HertsUK
  3. 3.Agriculture Faculty, Irrigation DepartmentUniversity of HarranSanliurfaTurkey

Personalised recommendations