Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 141–156 | Cite as

Firm Value, Information Problems and the Internal Capital Market

  • Leonard L. Lundstrum
Article

Abstract

We examine how information problems between the firm and the investor affect the value of an internal capital market. While the extant literature finds that, on average, the diversified firm's access to an internal capital market is positively related to firm value, this paper finds that the results hold only for firms which face low levels of information problems. Firms facing the high levels of information problems realize no value from internal capital market access, consistent with the Jensen Free Cash Flow hypothesis. When information problems are large, agency costs dominate any savings that result from using an internal capital market to avoid selling under-priced securities in the external capital markets.

internal capital market information problems firm value agency 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berger, P. and E. Ofek, “Diversification's Effect on FirmValue. ” Journal of Financial Economics 37, 39–65 (1995).Google Scholar
  2. Chen, C. R. and T. Steiner, “An Agency Analysis of Firm Diversification: The Consequences of Discretionary Cash and Managerial Risk Considerations. ” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 14, 247–260 (2000).Google Scholar
  3. Christie, A. A., “On Cross-Sectional Analysis in Accounting Research. ” Journal of Accounting and Economics 9, 231–258 (1987).Google Scholar
  4. Denis, D. J., D. K. Denis and A. Sarin, “Agency Problems, Equity Ownership and Corporate Diversification. ” Journal of Finance 52, 135–60 (1997).Google Scholar
  5. Healy, P., K. Palepu and A. Sweeney, “Causes and Consequences of Expanded Voluntary Disclosure. ” Harvard Business School. Working paper, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. Jensen, M., “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. ” American Economic Review 76, 323–329 (1986).Google Scholar
  7. Lins, K. and H. Servaes, “International Evidence on the Value of Corporate Diversification. ” Journal of Finance 54, 2215–2239 (1999).Google Scholar
  8. Lundstrum, L., “The Diversified Firm's Valuable Internal Capital Market. ” Corporate Finance Review 5, 23–31 (2000).Google Scholar
  9. Myers, S. and Majluf, “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms have Information that Investors Do not Have. ” Journal of Financial Economics 13, 187–221 (1984).Google Scholar
  10. Rajan, R., H. Servaes and L. Zingales, “The Cost of Diversity: The Diversification Discount and Inefficient Investment. ” Journal of Finance 55, 35–80 (2000).Google Scholar
  11. Shin, H. and R. Stulz, “Are Internal Capital Markets Efficient?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 531–552 (1998).Google Scholar
  12. Vogt, S., “The Cash Flow/Investment Relationship: Evidence from U.S. Manufacturing Firms. ” Financial Management 23, 3–20 (1994).Google Scholar
  13. White, H., “AHeteroscedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a DirectTest for Heteroscedasticity. ” Econometrica 48, 817–838 (1980).Google Scholar
  14. Williamson, O., Economic Organization: Firms, Markets and Policy Control. New York University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonard L. Lundstrum
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Business Management, College of ManagementNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations