Advertisement

Pharmacy World and Science

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 168–172 | Cite as

Referrals of dyspeptic self-care patients from pharmacies to physicians, supported by clinical guidelines

  • B. Marklund
  • T. Westerlund
  • J.‐ O. Brånstad
  • M. Sjöblom
Article

Abstract

Objective: It is important that self‐ medication customers with potentially serious diseases are correctly referred from pharmacies to physicians. The aim of this study was to determine the appropriateness of pharmacy practitioners in referring customers suffering from dyspepsia to a general practitioner (GP).Method: Practitioners in 12 pharmacies, supported by clinical guidelines and training, recorded information regarding the dyspeptic customers they referred to a physician on a data collection card. The card was sent to a GP participating in the study, who did a regular medical history of the referred customer over the phone and assessed whether the referral was appropriate or not.Results: Out of 133 referred customers with dyspepsia, 132 completed the study. The GPs found that 119 (90%) needed a medical examination and/or prescription drugs and thus assessed these referrals as appropriate. In three cases (2%) the referral was doubtful and in ten cases (8%) not adequate, as the symptoms were more likely to come from an irritable bowel syndrome than dyspepsia.Conclusion: The results confirm the role of pharmacy practitioners as important members of the primary health care team. Provided with the appropriate referral guidelines and training, they are in a position to operate as 'filters', promoting the adequate use of other primary care services.

Dyspepsia Guidelines Pharmacy practitioners Primary health care Referrals Self‐care Sweden 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dean K. Conceptual, theoretical, and methodological issues in selfcare research. Soc Sci Med 1989; 12: 117–23.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kemper DW, Lorig K, Mettler M. The effectiveness of medical selfcare interventions. A focus on self-initiated responses to symptoms. Pat Educ Couns 1993; 21: 29–39.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vingilis E, Brown U, Hennen B, Common colds. Reported patterns of self-care and health care use. Can Fam Phys 1999; 45: 2644–6, 2649–52.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blenkinsopp A, Bradley C. Patients, society, and the increase in self medication. BMJ 1996; 312(7031): 629–32.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marklund B, Karlsson G, Bengtsson C. The advisory service of the pharmacies as an activity of its own and as part of a collaboration with the primary health care services. J Soc Adm Pharm 1990; 7: 111–4.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carlsten A, Wennberg M, Bergendal. The influence of Rx-to-OTC changes on drug sales. Experiences from Sweden 1980–1994. J Clin Pharm Ther 1996; 21: 423–30.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marwick C. From Rx to OTC: More drugs make the switch. J Am Med Ass 1997; 278: 103.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hassel K, Noyce PR, Rogers A, Harris J, Wilkinson J. A pathway to the GP: The pharmaceutical consultation as a first port of call in primary health care. Fam Pract 1997; 14: 498–502.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bradley CP, Bond C. Increasing the number of drugs available over the counter: arguments for and against. Br J Gen Pract 1995; 45: 553–6.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tully MP, Hassel K, Noyce PR. Advice-giving in community pharmacies in the UK. J Health Serv Res Policy 1997; 2: 38–50.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brånstad J-O, Kamil I, Lilja J, Sjöblom M. When topical hydrocortisone became an OTC drug in Sweden - a study of the users and their information sources. Soc Sci Med 1994; 39: 207–12.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith FJ. Referral of clients by community pharmacists in primary care consultations. Int J Pharm Pract 1993; 2: 86–9.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Consumers' Association. Advice across the chemist's counter. Which? 1985; 351–4.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goodburn E, Mattosinho S, Mongi P, Wazerstone T. Management of childhood diarrhoea by pharmacists: is Britain lagging behind the third world? BMJ 1991; 302: 440–3.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krska J, Greenwood R, Howitt EP. Audit of advice provided in response to symptoms. Pharm J 1994; 252: 93––6.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Consumers' Association. Pharmacists: how reliable are they? Which? 1991; 191–4.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Spencer J, Edwards C. Pharmacy beyond the dispensary: general practitioners' views. BMJ 1992; 304: 1670–2.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Consumers' Association. Counter Advice. Which? 1999; 22–5.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marklund B, Bengtsson C, Björkander E. Uniform guidance for medical care. Scand J Caring Sci 1990;4:115–20.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marklund B, Silfverhielm B, Bengtsson C. Evaluation of an educational programme for telephone advisers in primary health care. Fam Pract 1989; 6: 263–7.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marklund B, The medical advisory service of health centers and pharmacies. Thesis. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 1990.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marklund B. Symptom advice intervention in pharmacy, part 1. Stockholm: Apoteket AB, 1998.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marklund B. Symptom advice intervention in pharmacy, part 2. Stockholm: Apoteket AB, 1999.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Chicago: McGraw Hill, 1983.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP, Russell IT. Developing clinically valid guidelines. J Eval Clin Pract 1995; 1: 37–48.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    APhA Drug Treatment Protocols: Self-care of self-limited pain. J Am Pharm Assoc 1999; 39; 3: 321–30.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bissell P, Ward PR, Noyce PR. Mapping the contours of risk: Consumer perceptions of non-prescription medicines. J Soc Adm in Pharm 2000; 17; 3: 136–42.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sihvo S, Hemminki E. Self-medication of dyspepsia: how appropriate is it? Scand J Gastroenterol 1997; 32; 9: 855–61.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krska J, John DN, Hansford D, Kennedy EJ. Drug utilization evaluation of nonprescription H2–receptor antagonists and alginate-containing preparations for dyspepsia. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 49(4): 363–8.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bissell P, Ward PR, Noyce PR. Variation within community pharmacy. J Soc Adm Pharm 1997; 14; 2:116–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Marklund
    • 1
    • 2
  • T. Westerlund
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • J.‐ O. Brånstad
    • 5
  • M. Sjöblom
    • 5
  1. 1.Research and Development UnitPrimary Health Care County HallandFalkenberg
  2. 2.Department of Primary Health CareGöteborg UniversityGöteborgSweden
  3. 3.Apoteket BjörnenHelsingborg
  4. 4.Department of Social MedicineGöteborg UniversityGöteborg
  5. 5.National Corporation of Swedish Pharmacies (Apoteket AB)StockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations