Advertisement

Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 121–148 | Cite as

Are Educational Psychology Courses Educationally and Psychologically Sound? What Textbooks and Teachers Say

  • Kenneth A. Kiewra
  • Patti S. Gubbels
Article

Abstract

Educational psychology courses should be the best taught courses on college campuses given that its instructors and textbook authors are resident experts in learning and teaching. More specifically, we contend that educational psychology courses should adhere to six principles. Educational psychology courses should: (a) be driven by teaching models, (b) integrate theory and practice, (c) provide opportunities to practice teaching skills, (d) present an integrated model for instructional planning, (e) prepare teachers to teach learning strategies, and (f) help students learn. We surveyed practicing teachers and analyzed current educational psychology texts and found that these principles are not upheld. We report on the principles, our findings, and how an educational psychology course that upholds these principles might be developed.

educational psychology teaching instructional planning learning strategies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Anderson, J. R. (1976). Language, Memory, and Thought, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications (2nd Ed.), New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, L. M., Blumenfeld, P., Pintrich, P. R., Clark, C. M., Marx, R. W., and Peterson, P. (1995). Educ. Psychol. 30: 143–157.Google Scholar
  4. Applebee, A. N. (1981). Writing in the Secondary Schools: English and the Content Areas. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, R. C., and Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Spence, K. W., and Spence, J. T. (eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 2), New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Berliner, D. (1992). Telling the stories of educational psychology. Educ. Psychol. 27: 143–161.Google Scholar
  7. Biehler, R. F., and Snownan, J. (1993). Psychology Applied to Teaching (7th ed.), Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  8. Bransford, J. D., (1979). Human Cognition: Learning, Understanding, and Remembering, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  9. Bransford, J. D., and Stein, B. S. (1984). The Ideal Problem Solver, New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  10. Bransford, J. D., Vye, N., Kinzer, C., and Risko, V. (1990). Teaching thinking and content knowledge: Toward an integrated approach. In Jones, B. F., and Idol, L. (eds.), Dimensions of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., and Ferrara, R. A. (1982). Mental retardation and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of Human Intelligence, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 392–490.Google Scholar
  12. Christopoulos, J. P., Rohwer, W. D., Jr., and Thomas, J. W. (1987). Grade level differences in students' study activities as a function of course characteristics. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 12: 303–323.Google Scholar
  13. Derry, S. J., and Murphy, D. A. (1986). Designing systems that train learning ability: From theory to practice. Rev. Educ. Res. 56: 1–39.Google Scholar
  14. Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, J. B., and Lenz, B. K. (1984). Academic and cognitive interventions for LD adolescents: Part 1. J. Learn. Disab. 17: 108–117.Google Scholar
  15. Dick, W., and Carey, L. (1988). The Systematic Design of Instruction (2nd Ed.), Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  16. Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., and Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Rev. Educ. Res. 61: 239–264.Google Scholar
  17. Durkin, D. (1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Res. Quart. 14: 481–538.Google Scholar
  18. Dweck, C. S., and Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychol. Rev. 95: 256–273.Google Scholar
  19. Gage, N. L., and Berliner, D. C. (1992). Educ. Psychol. (5th Ed.), Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  20. Gagné, R. M. (1984). Learning outcomes and their effects. Am. Psychol. 39: 377–385.Google Scholar
  21. Gagné, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning (4th Ed.), New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  22. Harrington, H., and Garrison, J. (1992). Cases as shared inquiry: A dialogical model of teacher preparation. Am. Educ. Res. J. 29: 715–735.Google Scholar
  23. Heller, J., and Reif, K. (1984). Prescribing effective human problem solving processes. Problem description in physics. Cognit. Instr. 1: 177–216Google Scholar
  24. Jenkins, J. J. (1978). Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments. In Cermak, L. S., and Craik, F. I. M. (eds.), Levels of Processing and Human Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K., and Yacci, M. (1993). Structural Knowledge, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Kiewra, K. A. (1994). The matrix representation system: Orientation, research, theory and application. In Smart, J. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
  27. Lesgold, A. (1988). Problem solving. In Sternberg, R. J., and Smith, E. E. (eds.), The Psychology of Human Thought, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Levin, J. R. (1986). Four cognitive principles of learning-strategy instruction. Educ. Psychol. 21: 3–17.Google Scholar
  29. Lorch, R. F., Jr. (1989). Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 1: 209–234.Google Scholar
  30. Marchant, G. J. (1995). Newslett. Educ. Psychol. 18: 8–9.Google Scholar
  31. Marshall, H., and McCombs, B. L. (1995). Learner-centered psychological principles: Guidelines for the teaching of educational psychology in teacher education programs. Newslett. Educ. Psychol. 19: 4–8.Google Scholar
  32. Maslow, A. H. (1962). Toward a Psychology of Being, Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  33. Mayer, R. E. (1984). Aids to text comprehension. Educ. Psychol. 19: 30–42.Google Scholar
  34. Mayer, R. E. (1989). Models for understanding. Rev. Educ. Res. 59: 43–64.Google Scholar
  35. Mayer, R. E., and Greeno, J. G. (1972). Structural differences between learning outcomes produced by different instructional methods. J. Educ. Psychol. 63: 165–173.Google Scholar
  36. Moely, B. E., Hart, S. S., Santalli, K., Leal, L., Johnson-Baron, T., Rao, N., and Burney, L. (1986). How do teachers teach memory skills? Educ. Psychol. 21: 55–72.Google Scholar
  37. O'Malley, J. M., Russo, R. P., Chamot, A. U., and Stewner-Manzanares, G. (1988). Applications of learning strategies by students learning English as a second language. In Weinstein, C. E., and Goetz, E. T. (Eds.). Learning and Study Strategies: Issues in Assessment, Instruction, and Evaluation, San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 215–231.Google Scholar
  38. Palincsar, A., and Brown, A. (1989). Classroom dialogues to promote self-regulated comprehension. In Brophy, J. (ed.), Advances in Research on Teaching, Volume 1: Teaching for Meaningful Understanding and Self-Regulated Learning, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  39. Paris, S., Cross, D., and Lipson, M. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension. J. Educ. Psychol. 76: 1239–1252.Google Scholar
  40. Paris, S., and Oka, E. (1986). Self-regulated learning among exceptional children. Excep. Childr. 53: 103–108.Google Scholar
  41. Perkins, D. N. (1987). Thinking frames: An integrative perspective on teaching cognitive skills. In Baron, J. and Sternberg, R. (eds.), Teaching Thinking Skills, New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  42. Perkins, D. N., and Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educ. Res. 18: 16–25.Google Scholar
  43. Piaget, J., and Inhelder, B. (1971). Mental Imagery in the Child, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  44. Pressley, M., and Levin, J. R. (1983a). Cognitive Strategy Research: Educational Applications, New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  45. Pressley, M., and Levin, J. R. (1983b). Cognitive Strategy Research: Theoretical Foundations, New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  46. Pressley, M., Borkowski, J. G., and O'Sullivan, J. T. (1984). Memory strategy instruction is made of this: Metamemory and durable strategy use. Educ. Psychol. 19: 94–107.Google Scholar
  47. Pressley, M., Goodchild, F., Fleet, J., Zajchowski, R., and Evans, E. D. (1989a). The challenges of classroom strategy instruction. Elem. School J. 89: 301–342.Google Scholar
  48. Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A., and Kurita, J. A. (1989b). Strategies that improve children's memory and comprehension of text. Elem. School J. 90: 3–32.Google Scholar
  49. Pressley, M., Woloshyn, V., Lysynchuk, L. M., Martin, V., Wood, E., and Willoughby, T. (1990). A primer of research on cognitive strategy instruction: The important issues and how to address them. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2: 1–58.Google Scholar
  50. Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., and Brown, R. (1992). Skilled and not-so-skilled reading. Good information processing and not-so-good information processing. In Pressley, M., Harris, K. R., and Guthrie, J. T. (eds.), Promoting Academic Competence and Literacy: Cognitive Research and Instructional Innovation, San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 91–127.Google Scholar
  51. Pressley, M., and McCormick, C. B. (1995). Cognition, Teaching, and Assessment, New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.Google Scholar
  52. Shank, R. C., and Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  53. Shulman, J. (ed.) (1992). Case Methods in Teacher Education, New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth A. Kiewra
    • 1
  • Patti S. Gubbels
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Nebraska-LincolnLincoln

Personalised recommendations