Advertisement

Sexuality and Disability

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 243–260 | Cite as

Devotees, Pretenders and Wannabes: Two Cases of Factitious Disability Disorder

  • Richard L. Bruno
Article

Abstract

Despite having been described for more than a century, there is no understanding of the origin of the attractions, desires and behaviors of devotees, pretenders and wannabes (DPW's). Devotees are non-disabled people who are sexually attracted to people with disabilities, pretenders are non-disabled people who act as if they have a disability by using assistive devices and wannabes actually want to become disabled, sometimes going to extraordinary lengths to have a limb amputated. Two cases are presented in an effort to understand the psychology of DPW's and to suggest one psychologic concept—that of Factitious Disability Disorders—that may explain not only the obsession to be with disabled persons, but also the desire to pretend to be disabled and even the compulsion to become disabled. Also presented is a combined cognitive-behavioral approach to modify DPW's obsessions and compulsive, intrusive, illegal and sometimes self-injurious behaviors.

amputees paraphilias sexual deviations factitious disorders Munchausen's syndrome 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Storrs B: Devotees of disability. New Mobility 6:50–53, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Storrs B: Amputees, Inc.: Amputees pitching products and themselves to devotees of disability. New Mobility 7: 26–31, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nattress LE: Amelotasis: A descriptive study (2nd Ed). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, 1996.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    von Krafft-Ebing E: Psychopathia Sexualis. Brooklyn: Physicians And Surgeons Books, 1932.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dickes R: Fetishistic behavior. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 11: 303–330, 1963.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davison C: Intrapsychic factors in the choice of a sexual object. Psychoanal Q 12: 217–222, 1943.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fleischl MF: A man's fantasy of a crippled girl. Am J Psychother 14: 471–748, 1960.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stekel W: Sexual aberrations (Vol 2). New York, Horace Liveright, 1930.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Money J: Paraphilia in females: Fixation on amputation and lameness. J Psych Human Sexuality 3: 165–172, 1990.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wakefield PL, Frank A, Meyers RW: The hobbyist: A euphemism for self-mutilation and fetishism. Bull Menninger Clinic 41:539–552, 1977.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Everaerd W: A case of apotemnophilia. A handicap as sexual preference. Am J Psychother 37: 285–293, 1983.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hirschfeld M: Sexual Anomalies. New York, Emerson Books, 1956.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    London LS: Dynamic Psychiatry: Transvestism-Desire for crippled women (Vol 2). New York. Corinthian Publications, 1952.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Money J, Jobaris R, Furth G: Apotemnophilia: Two cases of self-demand amputation as a paraphilia. J Sex Res 13: 115–125, 1977.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Money J, Simcoe KW: Acrotomophitia, sex and disability: New concepts and case report. Sexuality and Disability 7: 43–50, 1986Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Money J: The Adam Principle. Buffalo, Prometheus Books, 1993.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ollason JG: An interview with Mayda OverGround 5: 12–20, 1996.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dixon D: An erotic attraction to amputees. Sexuality and Disability 6: 3–19. 1983.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ollason JG: Why devotees sometimes behave badly. Available: http://www.ardgrain.demon.co.uk/overground/features/theory/whyde.html, 1997, July 7.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Frick NM, Bruno RL: Post-Polio Sequelae: Physiological and psychological overview. Rehabil Lit 47: 106–111, 1986.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taylor B: Amputee fetishism: an exclusive journal interview with Dr. John Money of Johns Hopkins. Maryland State Med J March: 35–38, 1976.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Woody RH: Integrated aversion therapy and psychotherapy. J Sex Res 9:313–324, 1973.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ollason JG: Denise Anne: An interview with the ultimate wannabe. OverGround 6:20–35, 1993.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Riddle GC: The origins of devotees' attraction. Invited presentation to the Fascination Conference, Chicago, 1988.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Steen N: Wannabe's page. Available: http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/8017/, 1997, July 7.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Anderson C: A little about me. Available: http://members.tripod.com/∼paracathy/MYSELF.TXT, 1997, July 7.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bruno RL: Predicting hyperactive behavior as a cause of non-compliance with rehabilitation: The Reinforcement Motivation Survey. J Rehabil 61: 50–57, 1995.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Blumer D, Heilbronn M: The pain-prone disorder: A clinical and psychological profile. Psychosomatics 22: 395–402, 1981.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Blumer D, Heilbronn M: Chronic pain as a variant of depressive disease. J Nerv Ment Dis 170: 381–406, 1982.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gentry WD, Shows WD, Thomas M: Chronic low back pain: A psychological profile. Psychosomatics 15: 174–177, 1974.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    “Paul:” A letter from Paul. OverGround 6:42–51, 1996.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Riddle GC: Amputees and devotees: Made for each other? New York: Irvington Publishers, 1988.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stoller RJ: Observing the erotic imagination. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    “Fritz:” A prosthetist's perspective. OverGround 3: 7–15, 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard L. Bruno
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Post-Polio Rehabilitation and Research ServiceKessler Institute for RehabilitationSaddle Brook
  2. 2.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationUMDNJ/New Jersey Medical SchoolNewark

Personalised recommendations