Advertisement

European Journal of Plant Pathology

, Volume 109, Issue 6, pp 577–587 | Cite as

Studies on in vitro Growth and Pathogenicity of European Fusarium Fungi

  • J.M. Brennan
  • B. Fagan
  • A. van Maanen
  • B.M. Cooke
  • F.M. Doohan
Article

Abstract

The effect of temperature on the in vitro growth rates and pathogenicity of a European Fusarium collection consisting of isolates of Fusarium graminearum,F. culmorum,F. avenaceum, F. poae and Microdochium nivale was examined. Irrespective of geographic origin, the optimum temperature for the growth of F. graminearum, F. culmorum and F. poae was 25 °C, while that for F. avenaceum and M. nivale was 20 °C. In general, the growth rates of F. graminearum, F. culmorum and F. poae increased between 10 and 25 °C and those of F. avenaceum and M. nivale increased between 10 and 20 °C. Pathogenicity tests were carried out by examining the effect of the five species on the in vitro coleoptile growth rate of wheat seedlings (cv. Falstaff). Irrespective of geographic origin, the temperature at which F. avenaceum, F. culmorum and F. graminearum caused the greatest retardation in coleoptile growth ranges 20–25 °C (>89.3% reduction), whilst for F. poae and M. nivale it was 10–15 °C (>45.6% retardation), relative to uninoculated control seedlings. In general, F. culmorum and F. graminearum were the most pathogenic of the five species, causing at least a 69% reduction in coleoptile growth at 10, 15, 20 and 25 °C. General linear model analysis (GLIM) showed that species accounted for 51.3–63.4% of the variation in isolate growth and from 19.5% to 44.3% of the variation in in vitro pathogenicity. Country of origin contributed from 22.6% to 51.9% to growth rate variation and from 0.73% to 7.61% to pathogenicity variation. The only significant correlation between in vitro growth and pathogenicity was that observed for M. nivale at 15 °C (r = -0.803, P < 0.05).

Fusarium species in vitro growth seedling pathogenicity temperature sensitivity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bai G and Shaner G (1996) Variation in Fusarium graminearum and cultivar resistance to wheat scab. Plant Disease 80: 975-979Google Scholar
  2. Campbell KAG and Lipps PE (1998) Allocation of resources: Sources of variation in Fusarium head blight screening nurseries. Phytopathology 88: 1078-1086Google Scholar
  3. Clear RM and Patrick SK (2000) Fusarium head blight pathogens isolated from Fusarium-damaged kernels of wheat in western Canada, 1993 to 1998. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 22: 51-60Google Scholar
  4. Cook RJ and Christen AA (1976) Growth of cereal root rot fungi as affected by temperature and water potential interactions. Phytopathology 30: 853-859Google Scholar
  5. Di Menna ME, Lauren DR and Smith WA (1991) Effect of incubation temperature on zearalenone production by strains of Fusarium crookwellense. Mycopathologia 116: 81-86Google Scholar
  6. Doohan FM, Parry DW and Nicholson P (1999) Fusarium ear blight: The use of quantitative PCR and visual disease assessment in the studies of disease control. Plant Pathology 48: 209-217Google Scholar
  7. Jimenez M, Manez M and Hernandez E (1996) Influence of water activity and temperature on the production of zearalenone in corn by three Fusarium species. International Journal of Food Microbiology 29: 417-421Google Scholar
  8. Levitin MM (2000) Recent developments in research on Fusarium head blight of cereals in Russia. In: 6th European Fusarium Seminar and Third COST 835 Workshop of Agriculturally Important Toxigenic Fungi (p 25) Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  9. Liggitt J, Jenkinson P and Parry DW (1997) The role of saprophytic microflora in the development of Fusarium ear blight of winter wheat by Fusarium culmorum. Crop Protection 16: 679-685Google Scholar
  10. Maurin N, Saur L and Capron G (1996) Stem and head reaction of winter wheat cultivars to artificial inoculation by Microdochium nivale under controlled environment and field conditions. Euphytica 39: 359-366Google Scholar
  11. Mesterhazy A (1983) Breeding wheat for resistance to Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung 91: 295-311Google Scholar
  12. Mesterhazy A (1984) A laboratory method to predict pathogenicity of Fusarium graminearum in field and resistance of wheat to scab. Acta Phytopathologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 19: 205-218Google Scholar
  13. NAG Software (1993) The generalized linear interactive modeling system. The Numerical Algorithms Group Limited, Royal Statistical Society, Lancaster Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. Parry DW, Pettitt TR, Jenkinson P and Lees AK (1994) The cereal Fusarium complex. In: Blakeman P and Williamson B (eds) Ecology of Plant Pathogens (pp 301-320) CAB International, Wallingford, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Parry DW, Jenkinson P and Mcleod L (1995) Fusarium ear blight (scab) in small grain cereals-a review. Plant Pathology 44: 207-238Google Scholar
  16. Pettitt TR and Parry DW (1996) Effect of climate change on Fusarium foot rot of winter wheat in the United Kindom. In: Frankland JC, Mangan N and Gadd GM (eds) Fungal and Environmental Change (pp 21-31) Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Pettitt TR, Parry DW and Polley RW (1996) Effect of temperature on the incidence of nodal foot rot symptoms in winter wheat crops in England andWales caused by Fusarium culmorum and Microdochium nivale. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 79: 233-242Google Scholar
  18. Polley RW, Turner JA, Cockerell V, Robb J, Scudamore KA, Sanders MF and Mangan N (1991) Survey of Fusarium species infecting winter wheat in England, Wales and Scotland, 1989-1990. Home Grown Cereals Authority Project Report 39Google Scholar
  19. Ponchet J (1966) Etude des communautes mycocarpiques du caryopse de ble. Annales des Epiphyties (hora serie) 17: 90-93Google Scholar
  20. Simpson DR, Weston GE, Turner JA, Jennings P and Nicholoson P (2001) Differential control of head blight pathogens of wheat by fungicides and consequences for mycotoxin contamination of grain. European Journal of Plant Pathology 107: 421-431Google Scholar
  21. Snedecor GW and Cochran WG (1980) Statistical Methods. The Iowa State University Press, Iowa, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Sutton JC (1982) Epidemiology of wheat head blight and maize ear rot caused by Fusarium graminearum. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 4: 195-209Google Scholar
  23. Velluti A, Marin S, Bettucci L, Ramos AJ and Sanchis V (2000) The effect of competition on maize grain by Fusarium moniliforme, F. proliferatum and F. graminearum and on fumonisin B1 and zearalenone formation. International Journal of Food Microbiology 59: 59-66Google Scholar
  24. Vigier B, Reid LM, Seifert KA, Stewart DW and Hamilton RI (1997) Distribution and prediction of Fusarium species associated with maize ear rot in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 19: 60-65Google Scholar
  25. Visconti A, Solfrizzo M, Avantaggiato G and De Girolamo A (2000) Strategies for detoxification of Fusarium mycotoxins and assessing in vitro the relevant effectiveness. In: Proceedings of Brighton Crop Protection Conference-Pests and Diseases 2000 (pp 721-728)Google Scholar
  26. Walker SL, Leath L, Hagler WM and Murphy JP (2001) Variation among isolates of Fusarium graminearum associated with Fusarium head blight in North Carolina. Plant Disease 85: 404-410Google Scholar
  27. Wang DH, Barbetti MJ and Sivasithamparan (1984) Effects of temperature and moisture on the pathogenicity of fungi associated with root rot of subterranean clover. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 35: 675-684Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.M. Brennan
    • 1
  • B. Fagan
    • 1
  • A. van Maanen
    • 1
  • B.M. Cooke
    • 1
  • F.M. Doohan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Resource Management, Agriculture and Food Science BuildingUniversity College DublinBelfield, Dublin 4Ireland

Personalised recommendations