Qualitative Sociology

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 187–209 | Cite as

Kinship Strategies and Self-Sufficiency Among Single Mothers by Choice: Post Modern Family Ties

  • Rosanna Hertz
  • Faith I. T. Ferguson


This article discusses findings from an on-going study of 50 single mothers by choice: women aged 21 to 50 when they become mothers, who are self-supporting economically, and who have chosen to become mothers as unmarried women. The interviews include women (both heterosexual and lesbian) who vary widely by race and social class. We argue that this group of women demonstrate ways of maintaining economic self-sufficiency—relying neither on the state nor on a male “provider”—through creative efforts at networking, resource sharing, and non-economic exchanges. We find that the route the women take to motherhood (adoption, known donor pregnancies, anonymous donor insemination, or “accidental” pregnancy) has a strong impact on the makeup of specific kin relationships between the mothers, their children, and others; yet all the mothers strategically forge or foster close ties which enable them to raise their children independently.

single mothers kinship networks self-sufficiency work and family 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Braveman, H. (1975). Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blankenhorn, D. (1995). Fatherless America: Confronting Our Most Urgent Social Problem. New York. Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Burton, L. (1990). “Teenage Childbearing as an Alternative Life-Course Strategy in Multigeneration Black Families. Human Nature. 1(2): 123–143.Google Scholar
  4. Burt, M. (1995). “Access to and Utilization of Preventive Services: Implications for Nonmarital Childbearing.” pp. 189–199 in Report to Congress on Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing. DHHS. Pub. No. (PHS)95-1257. Hyattsville, MD. U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  5. Burton, L. M. (1995). “Family Structure and Non marital Fertility: Perspectives from Ethnographic Research,” in U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Report to Congress on Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 95-1257. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Government Printing Office. (see for problems of aggregate data pp. 149-150 and see for importance of further ethnographic research pp. 147-148).Google Scholar
  6. Cherlin, A. J. (1981). Marriage. Divorce and Remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ehrenreich, B. (1983). The Hearts of Men: American Dreams and the Flight from Commitment. Garden City NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  8. Fraser, N. (1989). Unruly Practices. Minneapolis: University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Furstenberg, F. F., Jr., and K. M. Harris (1992). “The Disappearing American Father?: Divorce and the Waning Significance of Biological Parenthood.” In Scott J. South and Steward E. Tolnay (eds.) The Changing American Family: Sociological and Demographic Perspectives. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  10. Furstenberg, F. F. Jr., J. Brooks-Gunn, and S. Philip Morgan (1987). Adolescent Mothers in Later Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Furstenberg, F. F. Jr., and J. Brooks-Gunn. (1989). “Causes and Consequences of Teenage Pregnancy and Childbearing.” In M. N. Osawa (ed.) Women's Life Cycle and Economic Insecurity. New York: Greenwood Press. pp. 71–100.Google Scholar
  12. Garfinkel, I., and S. S. McLanahan (1986). Single Mothers and Their Children: New American Dilemma. Washington DC.: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gerson, K. (1993). No Man's Land: Men's Changing Commitments to Family and Work. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Glaser, B. G., and Strauss, A. L. (1967). On the Discovery of Grounded Theory. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  15. Hertz, R. (In press). “A Typology of Approaches to Childcare: The Centerpiece of Organizing Family Life For Dual-Earner Couples” Journal of Family Issues.Google Scholar
  16. Hertz, R., and F. I. T. Ferguson. (1996). “Childcare Choices and Constraints in the United States: Social Class, Race and the Influence of Family Views. Journal of Comparative family Studies. 25.Google Scholar
  17. Horowitz, R. (1995) Teen Mothers: Citizens or Dependents. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kissman, K. (1991). “Feminist-Based Social Work with Single-Parent Families,” in Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services. 72(1):23–28.Google Scholar
  19. McMahon, M. (1995). Engendering Motherhood: Identity and Self-Transformation in Women's Lives. NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. McLanahan, S., and K. Booth. (1989). “Mother-only Families: Problems, Prospects, and Politics,” in Journal of Marriage and the Family. 51: 577–80.Google Scholar
  21. Moore, K. A. (1995) “Executive Summary: Nonmarital Childbearing in the United States..” PP. v–xxii in Report to Congress on Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing. DHHS. Pub. No. (PHS)95-1257. Hyattsville, MD. U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  22. Pearce, D. (1978). “The Feminization of Poverty.” Urban and Social Change Review. Feb. 11:1, 28–36.Google Scholar
  23. Polakow, V. (1993). Lives on the Edge: Single Mothers and their Children in the Other America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Popenoe, D. (1990). “Family Decline in America” in D Blankenhorn et al. (Eds.) Rebuilding the Nest. Milwaukee WI: Family Service America.Google Scholar
  25. Stacey, J. (1990). Brave New Families. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. United States Bureau of the Census. (1995). From the on-line 1990 Census data:,Database: C90STF3A, summary level; State.Google Scholar
  27. United States Bureau of the Census. (1993) Population Profile of the United States 1993. Current Population Reports, Special Studies Series P23-185. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  28. United States Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1988). “Artificial Insemination: Practice in the United States: Summary of a 1987 Survey”, Background Paper 3.Google Scholar
  29. United States Department of Health and Human Services. (1995). Report to Congress On Out-Of-Wedlock Childbearing. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 95-1257. Hyattsville MD: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  30. Ventura, S. J., C. A. Bachrach, L. Hill, K. Kaye, P. Holcomb, E. Koff. (1995). pp. 3–80 in Report to Congress on Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing. DHHS. Pub. No. (PHS)95-1257. Hyattsville, MD. U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  31. Williams, C. W. (1991). Black Teenage Mothers: Pregnancy and Childrearing from their Perspective. Lexington, MA.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosanna Hertz
    • 1
  • Faith I. T. Ferguson
  1. 1.Women's Studies and SociologyWellesley CollegeWellesley

Personalised recommendations