Advertisement

Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture

, Volume 75, Issue 1, pp 57–62 | Cite as

In vitro and ex vitro growth of grapevine rootstock `5BB' as influenced by number of air exchanges and the presence or absence of sucrose in culture media

  • Seok-Won Shim
  • Eun-Joo Hahn
  • Kee-Yoeup PaekEmail author
Article

Abstract

Single node cuttings of grapevine rootstock `5BB' were cultured for 5 weeks under different numbers of air exchange (0, 0.8, 1.5, 2.5 and 4.4 h −1) with or without sucrose in the medium. To determine the effect of number of air exchanges related to presence or absence of sucrose, in vitro growth, net photosynthetic rate, stomata characteristics and ex vitro growth were investigated. Increasing numbers of air exchanges accelerated plantlet growth regardless of the presence or absence of sucrose in the medium; under the same number of air exchanges, plantlet growth and net photosynthesis were greater in sucrose-containing medium compared with sucrose-free medium. However, a high number of air exchanges (4.4 h−1) inhibited the growth and photosynthesis in sucrose-containing medium compared to sucrose-free medium. A higher number of stomata was observed in sucrose-containing medium, and larger size stomata was observed in sucrose-free medium. These results emphasize the importance of ventilation (increased number of air exchanges) during in vitro culture, for ex vitro plantlet survival was greatly affected by with or without air exchanges. Without air exchanges ex vitro plantlet survival was less than 70%, while air exchanges increased ex vitro survival by more than 90% with greater growth.

acclimatization CO2 concentration photosynthesis relative humidity ventilation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Capellades M, Fontarnau R, Carulla C & Debergh P (1990) Environment influences anatomy of stomata and epidermal cells in tissue-cultured Rosa multiflora. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 115: 141–145Google Scholar
  2. Chee R & Pool RM (1987) Improved inorganic media constituents for in vitro shoot multiplication of Vitis. Sci. Hort. 32: 85–95Google Scholar
  3. Correia MJ, Chaves MMC & Pereira JS (1990) Afternoon depression in photosynthesis in grapevine leaves - evidence for a high light stress effect. J. Exp. Bot. 41: 417–426Google Scholar
  4. Cui YC, Hahn EJ, Kozai T & Paek KY (2000) Number of air exchanges,sucrose concentration, photosynthetic photon flux, and differences in photoperiod and dark period temperatures affect growth of Rehmannia glutinosa plantlets in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 62: 219–226Google Scholar
  5. Fila G, Ghashghaie J, Hoarau J & Cornic G (1998) Photosynthesis, leaf conductance and water relations of in vitro cultured grapevine rootstock in relation to acclimatization. Physiol. Plant 102: 411–418Google Scholar
  6. Fujiwara K, Kozai T & Watanabe I (1987) Fundamental studies on environments in plant tissue culture vessels. (3) Measurements of carbon dioxide gas concentration in closed vessels containing tissue cultured plantlets and estimates of net photosynthetic rates of the plantlets. J. Agr. Meteorol. 43: 21–30Google Scholar
  7. Hahn EJ, Bae JH & Lee YB (1998) Growth and leaf-surface characteristics of chrysanthemum plantlets between micropropagation and microponic system. J. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 39: 838–842Google Scholar
  8. Hahn EJ & Paek KY (2001) High photosynthetic photon flux and high CO2 concentration under increased number of air exchanges promote growth and photosynthesis of four kinds of orchid plantlets in vitro. In vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 37: 678–682Google Scholar
  9. Kim EK (2002) Propagation of multiple shoots and microbulbs using bioreactor system in Garlic (Allium sativum L.). MS Dissertation, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim SJ (2001) Effects of environmental conditions on growth and quality of chrysanthemum plantlets in bioreactor culture. MS Dissertation, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  11. Kozai T (1991) Photoautotrophic micropropagation. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 27: 47–51Google Scholar
  12. Kozai T, Fujiwara K & Watanabe I (1986) Fundamental studies on environments in plant tissue culture vessels. (2) Effect of stoppers and vessels on gas exchange rates between inside and outside of vessels closed with stoppers. J. Agr. Met. 42: 119–127Google Scholar
  13. Kozai T & Sekimoto K (1988) Effect of the number of air exchanges per hour of the closed vessel and the photosynthetic photon flux on the carbon dioxide concentration inside the vessel and the growth of strawberry plantlets in vitro. Environ. Control Biol. 26: 21–29Google Scholar
  14. Kozai T, Yoshinaga K & Kubota C (1997) Rapid production of sweet potato cutting under controlled environment: CO2 enrich-ment and cutting preparation affected the growth and production rate. HortScience (Abstr.) 32: 481Google Scholar
  15. Karssen CM, Brinkhorst-van der Swan DLC, Breekland AE & Koornneef M (1983) Induction of dormancy during seed development by endogenous abscisic acid: studies on abscisic acid deficient genotypes of Arabidopsis thaliana L. Planta 157: 158–165Google Scholar
  16. Kubota C & Kozai T (1992) Growth and net photosynthetic rate of Solanum tuberosum in vitro under forced and natural ventilation. HortScience 27: 1312–1314Google Scholar
  17. Li RY, Murthy HN, Kim SK & Paek KY (2001) CO2 enrichment and photosynthetic photon flux affect the growth of in vitro-cultured apple plantlets. J. Plant Biol. 44: 87–91Google Scholar
  18. Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497Google Scholar
  19. Preece JE & Sutter EG (1991) Acclimatization of micropropagated plants to greenhouse and field. In: Debergh PC & Zimmerman RH (eds) Micropropagation: Technology and Application (pp. 71–93). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  20. Ross-Karstens GS, Ebert G & Luders P (1998) Influence of in vitro growth conditions on stomatal density, index and aperture of grapevine, coffee, and banana plantlets. Plant Tiss. Cult. Biotechnol. 4: 21–27Google Scholar
  21. SAS Institute (1989) SAS/STAT User's Guide. 4th edn. vers. 6. SAS Inst., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  22. Seon JH, Cui CH, Paek KY, Yang CS, Gao WY, Park CH & Sung SN (1999) Effects of air exchange, sucrose, and PPF on growth of Rehmannia glutinosa under enriched CO2 concentration in vitro. Acta Hort. 502: 313–318Google Scholar
  23. Shim SW, Kim SK & Paek KY (2001) Effects of micro-environmental conditions on organogenesis of ‘Beni Izu’ grapevines. J. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 42: 238–242Google Scholar
  24. Sutter E (1988) Stomatal and cuticular water loss from apple, cherry, and sweetgum plants after removal from in vitro culture. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 113: 234–238Google Scholar
  25. Tanaka K, Fujiwara K & Kozai T (1992) Effects of relative humidity in the culture vessel on the transpiration and net photosynthetic rates of potato plantlets in vitro. Acta Hort. 319: 59–64Google Scholar
  26. Walker PN, Heuser CW & Heinemann PH (1988) Micropropagation: studies of gasous environments. Acta Hort. 230: 145–152Google Scholar
  27. Yue D, Desjardins Y, Lamarre M & Gosselin A (1992) Photo-synthesis and transpiration of in vitro cultured asparagus plantlets. Sci. Hort. 49: 9–16Google Scholar
  28. Ziv M (1991) Vitrification: morphological and physiological disorders of in vitro plantlets. In: Debergh PC & Zimmerman RH (eds) Micropropagation: Technology and Application (pp. 45–69). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Center for the Development of Advanced Horticultural TechnologyChungbuk National UniversityCheong-juSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Horticulture National Highland Agriculture Research InstituteRDAPyeongchangSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations