Advertisement

Prevention Science

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 137–153 | Cite as

A Framework for Understanding “Evidence” in Prevention Research and Programs

  • Sheppard G. KellamEmail author
  • Doris J. Langevin
Article

Abstract

This report provides a multidimensional framework for understanding the meaning of evidence in prevention science. Six themes comprise the framework, each with impact on the meaning of evidence. (1) There are rigorous prevention scientific strategies now in use; each has shared but also unique requirements for the meaning of evidence. Some are directed at individuals, others at small social contexts, others at larger societal structures. (2) The phases of prevention research have shared but also unique requirements for evidence. These include efficacy, effectiveness, sustainability, going-to-scale, and sustaining programs systemwide. (3) Prevention programs address different segments of the population defined by levels of risk: the total population; a smaller subpopulation at increased risk; or a still smaller subpopulation at very high risk. The levels influence the meaning of evidence. (4) Economic analysis and economic evidence must become a central part of prevention research. These are needed for appropriate policy decision making and for assessing long-term benefits. (5) Collaboration is required for rigor in prevention research: including researchers, but also policy makers, program advocates and leaders, and community and institutional leaders. Broad ownership is critical for implementing rigorous research and for sustaining program fidelity. (6) Acceptance of a multidimensional framework for understanding “evidence” is essential across those agencies and institutions that carry out and/or use prevention science. The more widely the vision of the prevention field is shared, and the more the various qualities and rules of evidence are accepted and implemented, the better the quality will be of prevention research and programs.

prevention research epidemiology randomized field trials random control trials phases of prevention research economic analysis community and institutional partnerships prevention science strategies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bierman, K., Greenberg, M. T., & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (1996). Social skills in the FAST Track Program. In R. D. Peters & R. J. McMahon (Eds.), Prevention and early intervention: Childhood disorders, substance abuse, and delinquency (pp. 65-89). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Biglan, A. (1995). Changing cultural practices: A contextual framework for intervention research. Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  3. Biglan, A., Ary, D., Koehn, V., Levings, D., Smith, S., Wright, Z., James, L., & Henderson, J. (1996). Mobilizing positive reinforcement in communities to reduce youth access to tobacco. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24(5), 625-638.Google Scholar
  4. Biglan, A., Mrazek, P., Carnine, D. W., & Flay, B. R. (in press). The integration of research and practice in the prevention of youth problem behaviors. American Psychologist.Google Scholar
  5. Botvin, G. J., & Griffin, K. W. (1999). Preventing drug abuse. In A. J. Reynolds, R. P. Weissberg, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Positive outcomes in children and youth: Promotion and evaluation (pp. 197-228). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Botvin, G. J., Griffin, K. W., Diaz, T., Miller, N., & Williams, M. (1999). Smoking initiation and escalation in early adolescent girls: One-year follow-up of a school-based prevention intervention for minority youth. Journal of the American Medical Women's Association, 54, 139-143.Google Scholar
  7. Build Mentally Healthy Communities, Federal Register: March 15, 2001, 66(51), 15131-15133. (See http://fr.cos.com/cgi-bin/getRec?id=20010315a117). Rockville, Maryland. SAMHSA, US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  8. Chaloupka, F. J., Saffer, H., & Grossman, M. (1993). Alcohol control policies and motor vehicle fatalities. Journal of Legal Studies, 22(1), 161-186.Google Scholar
  9. Cicchetti, D., Rappaport, J., Sandler, I., & Weissberg, R. (Eds.) (2000). The promotion of wellness in children and adolescents. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, N. J. (2002). The promotion of mental health and the prevention of mental and behavioral disorders: Surely the time is right. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 4(1), 3-29.Google Scholar
  11. Eddy, J. M., Reid, J. C. & Fetrow, R. A. (2000). An elementary school-based prevention program targeting modifiable antecedents of youth delinquency and violence: Linking the Interests of Families and Teachers (LIFT). Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 165-176.Google Scholar
  12. Elliot, D. (1998). Blueprints for violence prevention. Goldon, CO: Venture Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Flay, B. R. (1986). Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Preventive Medicine, 15, 451-474.Google Scholar
  14. Forster, J. L., Murray, D. M., Wolfson, M., Blaine, T. M., Wagenaar, A. C., & Hennrikus, D. J. (1998). The effects of community policies to reduce youth access to tobacco. American Journal of Public Health, 88(8), 1193-1198.Google Scholar
  15. Gordon, R. (1983). An operational classification of disease prevention. Public Health Reports, 98, 107-109.Google Scholar
  16. Gottfredson, D. C. (2001). Schools and delinquency. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Greenberg, M., Domitrovich, C., & Bumbarger, B. (2001). The prevention of mental disorders in school-aged children: Current state of the field. Prevention and Treatment, 4 (Article 1): posted 3/30/01: http://www.journals.apa.org/prevention/volume4/pre0040001a.html.Google Scholar
  18. Greenberg, M. T., Kusche, C. A., Cook, E. T., & Quamma, J. P. (1995). Promoting emotional competence in school-aged children: The effects of the PATHS curriculum. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 117-136.Google Scholar
  19. Hann, D. M., & Borek, N. (2001). Taking stock of risk factors for child/youth externalizing behavior problems. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes for Health.Google Scholar
  20. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992a). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64-105.Google Scholar
  21. Hawkins, J., Catalano, R., Morrison, D., O'Donnell, J., Abbott, R., & Day, L. (1992b). The Seattle Social Development Project: Effects of the first four years on protective factors and problem behaviors. In J. McCord & R. Tremblay (Eds.), The prevention of antisocial behavior in children (pp. 139-161), New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  22. Hingson, R. W., McGovern, T., Howland, J., Heeren, T., Winter, M., & Zakocs, R. (1996). Reducing alcohol-impaired driving in Massachusetts: The Saving Lives Program. American Journal of Public Health, 86(6), 791-797.Google Scholar
  23. Holder, H. (1999). Community Responses. In R. T. Ammerman, P. J. Ott, & R. E. Tarter (Eds.), Prevention and societal impacts of drug and alcohol abuse (pp. 327-344). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  24. Holder, H., Boyd, G., Howard, J., Flay, B., Voas, R., & Grossman, M. (1995). Alcohol-problem prevention policy: The need for a phases research model. Journal of Public Health Policy, 16(3), 324-346.Google Scholar
  25. Holder, H., Flay, B., Howard, J., Boyd, G., Voas, R. B., & Grossman, M. (1999). Phases of alcohol problem prevention research. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 23(1), 183-194.Google Scholar
  26. Holder, H., Gruenewald, P. J., Ponicki, W. R., Grube, J. W., Saltz, R. F., Voas, R. B., Reynolds, R., Davis, J., Sanchez, L., Gaumont, G., Roeper, P., & Treno, A. J. (2000). Effects of community-based interventions on high-risk drinking and alcohol-related injuries. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(18), 2341-2347.Google Scholar
  27. Holder, H., Saltz, R., Grube, A., Treno, A., Reynolds, R., Voas, R., & Gruenewald, P. (1997). Summing up: Lessons from a comprehensive community prevention trial. Addiction, 92(2), S294-S301.Google Scholar
  28. Holder, H., & Wagenaar, A. C. (1994). Mandated server training and reduced alcohol-involved traffic crashes: A time series analysis of the Oregon experience. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 26(1), 89-97.Google Scholar
  29. Hord, S. M. (1990). Realizing school improvement through understanding the change process. Issues...About Change, 1(1).Google Scholar
  30. Kellam, S. G. (2000). Community and institutional partnerships for school violence prevention. Plenary Papers of the 1999 Conference on Criminal Justice Research and Evaluation-Enhancing Policy and Practice Through Research, 2, 1-19.Google Scholar
  31. Kellam, S. G. (2000). Four Prevention Science Strategies. Presidential Address, Society for Prevention Research Annual Conferences.Google Scholar
  32. Kellam, S. G., Koretz, D., & Moscicki, E. K. (1999). Core elements of developmental epidemiologically based prevention research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 463-482.Google Scholar
  33. Kellam, S. G., Ling, X., Merisca, R., Brown, C. H., & Ialongo, N. (1998). The effect of the level of aggression in the first grade classroom on the course and malleability of aggressive behavior into middle school. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 165-185. See also the erratum: Kellam, S. G., Ling, X., Merisca, R., Brown C. H., & Ialongo, N. (2000). The effect of the level of aggression in the first grade classroom on the course and malleability of aggressive behavior into middle school: Results of a developmental epidemiology-based prevention trial: Erratum. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 107.Google Scholar
  34. Kellam, S. G., Rebok, G. W., Ialongo, N., & Mayer, L. S. (1994). The course and malleability of aggressive behavior from early first grade into middle school: Results of a developmental epidemiologically-based preventive trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 259-281.Google Scholar
  35. Lengua, L., Wolchik, S., Sandler, I., & West, S. (2000). The additive and interactive effects of parenting and temperament in predicting problems of children of divorce. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29, 232-244.Google Scholar
  36. McMahon, R. J., & Greenberg, M. T. (1995). The FAST Track Program: A developmentally focused intervention for children with conduct problems. Clinician's Research Digest, Supplemental Bulletin, 13.Google Scholar
  37. Mihalic, S., Irwin, K., Elliott, D., Fagan, A., and Hansen, D. (2001). Blueprints for violence prevention. Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  38. Mrazek, P. J., & Haggerty, R. J. (Eds). (1994). Reducing risks for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  39. Muller, J., and Mihalic, S. (1999). Blueprints: A violence prevention initiative. Fact sheet. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  40. National Advisory Mental Health Counsel Workgroup on Mental Disorders Prevention Research. (1998). Priorities for research at NIMH. (NIH Publication No. 98-4321). Washington DC: National Institute for Mental Health, National Institutes for Health.Google Scholar
  41. Olds, D. (1997). The prenatal/early infancy project: Fifteen years later. In G. W. Albee & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Primary prevention works. Issues in children's and families' lives, Vol. 6 (pp. 41-67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Olds, D. L., Eckenrode J., Henderson C. R., Jr., Kitzman H., Powers J., Cole R., Sidora K., Morris P., Pettitt L.M., Luckey D. (1997). Long-term effects of home visitation on maternal life course and child abuse and neglect: Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized trial. JAMA, 278, 637-643.Google Scholar
  43. Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R., & Kitzman, H. (1994). Does prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation have enduring effects on qualities of parental care-giving and child health at 25 to 50 months of life? Pediatrics, 93, 89-98.Google Scholar
  44. Pentz, M. (1999). Prevention in the community. In R. T. Ammerman, P. J. Ott, & R. E. Tarter (Eds.), Prevention and societal impacts of drug and alcohol abuse (pp. 327-344). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  45. Pentz, M. (2000). Institutionalizing community-based prevention through policy change. Journal of Community Psychology, 28(3), 257-270.Google Scholar
  46. Rutter, M. (1979). Protective factors in children's responses to stress and disadvantage. In M. W. Kent & J. E. Rolf (Eds.), Primary prevention of psychopathology. Vol. 3: Social competence in children (pp. 49-74). Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  47. Safe Schools and Healthy Students Initiative Federal Register: May 18, 2001, 66(97), 27819-27823. Washington, DC. US Department of Education.Google Scholar
  48. Sameroff, A. J., & Seifer, R. (1990). Early contributors to developmental risk. In J. Rolf, A. S. Masten, D. Cicchetti, K. H. Nuechterlein, & S. Weintraub (Eds.), Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology (pp. 52-66). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Sandler, I., Tein, J., Mehta, P., Wolchik, S., & Ayers, T. (2000). Coping efficacy and psychological problems of children of divorce. Child Development, 71, 1099-1118.Google Scholar
  50. Stoolmiller, M., Eddy, J. M., & Reid, J. (2000). Detecting and describing preventive intervention effects in a universal school-based randomized trial targeting delinquent and violent behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(2), 296-306.Google Scholar
  51. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Publ. L. 107-110. 8 Jan. 2002.Google Scholar
  52. The Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act, Publ. L. 103-82, 20 U.S.C. 7101 et seq (1994).Google Scholar
  53. Tremblay, R. E., Pagani-Kurtz, L., Masse, L. C., & Vitaro, F. (1995). A bimodal preventive intervention for disruptive kindergarten boys: Its impact through mid-adolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 560-568.Google Scholar
  54. Voas, R. B., Holder, H. D., and Gruenewald, P. J. (1997). The effect of drinking and driving interventions on alcohol-involved crashes within a comprehensive community trial. Addiction, 92 (ppl. 2), S221-S236.Google Scholar
  55. Wagenaar, A. C., Gehan, J. P., Jones-Webb, R., Toomey, T. L., & Forster, J. (1999). Communities mobilizing for change on alcohol: Lessons and results from a 15-community randomized trail. Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 315-326.Google Scholar
  56. Wagenaar, A. C., Murray, D. M., & Toomey, T. L. (2000). Communities mobilizing for change on alcohol (CMCA): Effects of a randomized trial on arrests and traffic crashes. Addictions, 95(2), 209-217.Google Scholar
  57. Wagenaar, A. C., O'Malley, P. M., & LaFond, C. (in press). Very low legal blood alcohol concentration limits for young drivers: Effects on drinking, driving, and driving-after-drinking behaviors in 30 states. American Journal of Public Health.Google Scholar
  58. Wagenaar, A. C. & Toomey, T. L. (2000). Effects of minimum drinking age laws: Review and analyses of the literature. Rockville, MD: Advisory Council Subcommittee.Google Scholar
  59. Webster-Stratton, C. (1998). Preventing conduct problems in head start children: Strengthening parent competencies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 715-730.Google Scholar
  60. Wolchik, S., Wilcox, K., Tein, J., & Sandler, I. (2000). Maternal acceptance and consistency of discipline as buffers of divorce stressors on children's psychological adjustment problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 87-102.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Integrating Education and Prevention Research in SchoolsAmerican Institutes for ResearchWashington, District of Columbia
  2. 2.SAMHSA/CMHS Evidence-Based Prevention ProjectRockville
  3. 3.Bloomberg School of Public HealthJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimore
  4. 4.Society for Prevention ResearchWashington, DC

Personalised recommendations