European Journal of Epidemiology

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 479–485 | Cite as

The validity of self-reported leisure time physical activity, and its relationship to serum cholesterol, blood pressure and body mass index. A population based study of 332,182 men and women aged 40–42 years

  • Nibia Aires
  • Randi Selmer
  • Dag Thelle
Article

Abstract

The importance of leisure time physical activity as a health indicator became more obvious after the results of large prospective studies were published. The validity of these results depends upon both the selection of the active individuals and to what extent self-reported physical activity reflects the individual's true activity. The purpose of this paper is to describe the changes in self-reported physical activity, and to assess the relation between this variable and other biological risk factors such as blood lipids, blood pressure and body mass index (BMI). This report also aims at corroborating the validity of self-reported physical activity by assessing the consistency of the associations between these biological risk factors and physical activity during a 25-years period. The basis for this analysis is a long lasting observational study with a questionnaire as the most important research instrument, in addition to physiological and biological factors such as BMI, blood pressure and blood lipids. The study population consists of 332,182 individuals, aged 40–42 from different counties in Norway who were invited to participate in health survey during 1974–1999. The objectives of this study are (1) to describe changes in self-reported physical activity from 1974 to 1999; (2) to assess the relation between physical activity and the biological variables; and (3) to corroborate the validity of the variable physical activity by assessing the consistency of the above analysis. The results of the analyses of association between decade of birth and self-reported physical activity show that physical activity among 40-aged individuals decreased during 1974–1999. This trend is stronger among the men. Multivariate analyses revealed differences in BMI and serum cholesterol between levels of self-reported physical activity, gender, smoking habits and decade of birth. The explained percentage of the total variance ranged from 6% for BMI to 7% for serum cholesterol. The similar shape of serum cholesterol and BMI according to physical activity indicates that the validity of self-reported physical activity has remained stable over these 25 years. Furthermore, the analysis of covariance showed that the slopes relating year of birth and serum cholesterol and BMI are parallel for self-reported physical activity thus the validity of the variable is confirmed.

Epidemiology Health indicator Physical activity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Morris J, Heady J, Raffle P, Roberts C, Parks J. Coronary heart disease and physical activity of work. Lancett 1953; ii: 1053.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Health Screening Service. The cardiovascular disease study in Norwegian counties. Results from the second screening. Monograph from the National Health Screening Service, Oslo, 1988.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Curfman GD. The health benefits of exercise. A critical reappraisal. N Eng J Med 1993; 328(8): 574–576.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Førde OH, Thelle DS. The Tromsø Heart Study, Scand J Soc Med 1980; 8: 49–54.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Selmer R. The Bergen Blood Pressure Study - methodological issues and long-term outcome, National Health Screening Service, Oslo, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tverdal A. Cohort study of ethnic group and cardiovascular and total mortality over 15 years. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50(6): 719–723.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilhelmsen L, Tibblin G, Aurell M, Bjure J, Ekström-Jodal B, Grimby G. Physical Activity, physical fitness and risk of myocardial infarction. Adv Cardiol 1976; 18: 217–230.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saltin B, Grimby G. Physiological analysis of middleaged and old former athletes. Circulation 1968; 38: 1104–1115.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thune I, Njølstad I, Løchen ML, Førde OH. Physical activity improves the metabolic risk profiles in men and women. The Tromsø Study. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 1633–1640.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karlsen KB, Ommundsen Y. Problemer med å være fysisk aktiv? Resultater fra 40-åringsundersøkelsen i Hedmark fylke. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1997; 117: 2790–2794.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meyer HE, Tverdal A, Falck JA. Risk factors for hip fracture in middle-aged Norwegian women and men. Am J Epid 1993; 137: 1203–1211.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Njølstad I, Arnesen E, Lund-Larsen PG. Sex differences in risk factors for clinical diabetes mellitus in a general population: A 12 year follow-up of the Finnmark Study. Am J Epid 1997; 147: 49–58.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paffenbarger RS, Brand RJ, Sholtz RI, Jung DL. Energy expenditure, cigarette smoking, and blood pressure level as related todeath from specific diseases. Am J Epidemiol 1978; 108: 12–18.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paffenbarger Jr RS, Hyde RT, Wing AL, Lee I-M, Jung DL, Kampert JB. The association of changes in physical-activity level and other lifestyle characteristics with mortality among men. N Eng J Med 1993; 328: 538–545.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sandvik L, Erikssen J, Thaulow E, Erikssen G, Mundal R, Rodahl K. Physical fitness as a predictor of mortality among healthy, middle-aged Norwegian men. N Eng J Med 1993; 328: 533–537.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thune I, Brenn T, Lund E, Gaard M. Physical activity and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1269–1275.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thune I, Lund E. The influence of physical activity on lung cancer risk: A prospective study of 81,516 men and women. Int J Cancer 1997; 70: 57–62.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Veierød M, Thelle D, Laake P. Diet and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma: A prospective study of 50,757 Norwegian men and women. Int J Cancer 1997; 71: 600–604.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nibia Aires
    • 1
  • Randi Selmer
    • 2
  • Dag Thelle
    • 3
  1. 1.The Cardiovascular Institute, Department of MedicineSahlgrenska University Hospital/ÖstraGothenburgSweden
  2. 2.National Institute of Public HealthOsloNorway
  3. 3.The Cardiovascular Institute, Department of MedicineSahlgrenska University Hospital/ÖstraGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations