Population and Environment

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 247–277

The Association Between Environmental Risk and Internal Migration Flows

  • Lori M. Hunter
Article

Abstract

Over the past several decades, the environmental awareness and concern of the American public has greatly increased. This concern is reflected, for example, in public opinion polls, participation in curbside recycling programs and community mobilization against the siting of environmentally-hazardous facilities. This study examines the possibility that such concern is also reflected by internal migration patterns. More specifically, this research considers the relationship between county-level environmental characteristics and in- and outmigration streams. The results suggest that counties with environmental hazards such as air and water pollution, hazardous waste and Superfund sites do not lose residents at greater rates than areas without such hazards. However, areas with such risks gain relatively fewer new residents.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Adler, R. W., Landman, J.C., & Cameron, D.M. (1993). The Clean Water Act: 20 years later. Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht, D.E. & Hwang, S.S. (1991). Neighborhood selection and residential segregation. Sociological Inquiry, 61(2), 199-218.Google Scholar
  3. Beale, C.L. (1975). The revival of population growth in nonmetropolitan America. Bulletin ERS-605. Economic Development Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. As reprinted in Morrison, P.A. (Ed.). (1990). A Taste of the Country: A Collection of Calvin Beale's Writings. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, P. & Mikkelsen, E. (1990). No safe place: Toxic waste, leukemia, and community action. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bullard, R. D. & Wright, B.H. (1992). The quest for environmental equity: Mobilizing the black community for social change. In Dunlop, R.E. & Mertig, A.G. (Eds.). American Environmentalism: The Environmental Movement 1970–1990, pp. 39-50. Washington DC: Tyler and Francis.Google Scholar
  6. Chesire, P. & Sheppard, S. (1995). On the price of land and the value of amenities. Economica, 62, 247-267.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, D.E. & Nieves, L.A. (1994). An interregional hedonic analysis of noxious facility impacts on local wages and property values. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 235-253.Google Scholar
  8. Degler, S.E. (1971). Federal pollution control programs: Water air, and solid wastes. Washington DC: The Bureau of National Affairs.Google Scholar
  9. Dunlap, R.E. (1991). Public opinion in the 1980s: Clear consensus, ambiguous commitment. Environment, 33(8), 10-15, 32–37.Google Scholar
  10. Dunlap, R.E. (1992). Trends in public opinion toward environmental issues: 1965–1990. In Dunlap, R.E. & Mertig, A.G. (Eds.). American Environmentalism: The U.S. Environmental Movement, 1970–1990, pp. 89-116. Washington DC: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  11. Dunlap, R.E. & Mertig, A.G. (1992). The evolution of the U.S. environmental movement from 1970 to 1990: An overview. In R.E. Dunlap & Mertig, A.G. (Eds.) American Environmentalism: The U.S. Environmental Movement, 1970–1990 (pp. 1-10). Washington DC: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  12. Dunlap, R.E. & Scarce, R. (1991). The polls-poll trends: Environmental problems and protection. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 651-672.Google Scholar
  13. Elgin, Duane, Logothetti, Thomas L., & Cox, Sue (1974). City size and the quality of life. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. Environmental Protection Agency. (February 1993). Solid waste and emergency response (OS-312). National Biennial RCRA Hazardous Waste Report: Executive Summary. EPA530-S-92-027.Google Scholar
  15. Fagan, M. & Longino Jr., C.F. (1993). Migrating retirees: A Source for economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 7(1), 98-106.Google Scholar
  16. Fishcoff, Baruch, Svenson, O. & Slovic, P. (1987). Active responses to environmental hazards: Perceptions and decision-making. In D. Stokols and I. Altman (Eds.). Handbook of Environmental Psychology. Vol. 2. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  17. Fuguitt, G.V. (1985). The nonmetropolitan population turnaround. Annual Review of Sociology. 11, 259-80.Google Scholar
  18. Fuguitt, G.V., Heberlein, T.A., & Rathbun, P.R. (1991). Migration consequences for household energy consumption in a nonmetropolitan recreation-retirement area. Rural Sociology, 56(1), 56-69.Google Scholar
  19. General Accounting Office (GAO). (1983). Siting of hazardous waste landfills and their correlation with racial and economic status of surrounding communities. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  20. Gober, P. (1993). Americans on the move. Population Bulletin, 48(3).Google Scholar
  21. Hsieh, C.T. & Liu, B.C. (1983). The pursuance of better quality of life: In the long run, better quality of social life is the most important factor in migration. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 42(4), 431-440.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, K.M. (1993). Demographic change in nonmetropolitan America, 1980 to 1990. Rural Sociology, 58(3), 347-365.Google Scholar
  23. Johnson, K.M. & Beale, C.L. (1994). The recent revival of widespread population growth in nonmetropolitan areas of the United States. Rural Sociology, 59(4), 655-667.Google Scholar
  24. Long, L. H. (1988). Migration and residential mobility in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  25. Massey, D. S. & Fong, E. (1990). Segregation and neighborhood quality: Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians in the San Francisco Metropolitan Area. Social Forces, 69(1), 15-32.Google Scholar
  26. McAuley, W. J. & Nutty, C.L. (1982). Residential Preferences and Moving Behavior: A Family Life-Cycle Analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, May, 301-309.Google Scholar
  27. Moeller, D.W. (1992). Environmental health. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Mohai, P. & Bunyan B. (1992a). Environmental racism: Reviewing the evidence. In Bryant, B. and Mohai, P. (Eds.). Race and the incidence of environmental hazards: A time for discourse, pp. 163-76. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  29. Mohai, P. & Bunyan, B. (1992b). Race, poverty and the environment: The disadvantaged face greater risks. EPA Journal 18,1, 6-8.Google Scholar
  30. Nord, M., Luloff, A.E. & Jensen, L. (1995). Migration and the spatial concentration of poverty. Rural Sociology, 60(3), 399-415.Google Scholar
  31. Redmond, J. C., Cook, J.C. & Hoffman, A.A.J. (Eds.). (1971). Clearing the air: The impact of the Clean Air Act on technology. New York, NY: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.Google Scholar
  32. Schachter, J. & Althaus, P.G. (1982). Neighborhood quality and climate as factors in U.S. net migration patterns, 1974–1976. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 41(4), 387-399.Google Scholar
  33. Shryock, H. S., Jacob, S. S. & Associates. (1976). The methods and materials of demography. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. South, S. J. & Deane, G.D. (1993). Race and residential mobility: Individual determinants and structural constraints. Social Forces, 72(1), 147-167.Google Scholar
  35. StataCorp (1997). Stata statistical software: Reference manuals: Release 5.0. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  36. Tiebout, C.M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416-424.Google Scholar
  37. Wagner, T. P. (1990). Hazardous waste identification and classification manual. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  38. Wolpert, J (1966). Migration as an adjustment to environmental stress. Journal of Social Issues, 22(4), 92-102.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lori M. Hunter
    • 1
  1. 1.Population Research LaboratoryUtah State UniversityLogan

Personalised recommendations