European Journal of Epidemiology

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 531–538

Tobacco and alcohol consumption, sedentary lifestyle and overweightness in France: A multilevel analysis of individual and area-level determinants

  • Basile Chaix
  • Pierre Chauvin


Using a representative sample of the French population, a multilevel analysis allowed us to examine the effect of the level of consumerism, expressed as the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in the broad area of residence, on the risks of smoking, drinking, sedentary behaviour and overweightness. After adjustment for potential confounders, we found no GDP effect on the odds of being a moderate smoker. Conversely, the risk of being a highly dependent smoker as opposed to a moderate consumer or an abstainer increased with the area-level GDP per capita (OR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.04–1.23 for an increment of one standard deviation). A similar pattern was found for alcohol consumption: the odds of being a moderate consumer were not related to the GDP per capita, but a positive effect of the GDP on the odds of being an alcohol-dependent drinker as opposed to a moderate consumer or an abstainer was found among women (OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.02–1.28). The gap between the sexes with respect to alcohol-dependency therefore appeared to be narrower when the GDP per capita was high. On the other hand, the risk of overweightness was found to increase with the area-level GDP per capita among blue-collar workers only (OR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.03–1.43). Beyond the well-documented socioeconomic effects operating at both the individual and the local neighbourhood levels, our study suggests that broader areas of residence, through their level of economic development, may also have an independent impact on health-related behaviour.

Health-related behaviour Multilevel analysis Socioeconomic factors 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Blane D, Hart CL, Smith GD, et al. Association of cardiovascular disease risk factors with socioeconomic position during childhood and during adulthood. Br Med J 1996; 313: 1434–1438.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Uitenbroek DG, Kerekovska A, Festchieva N. Health lifestyle behaviour and socio-demographic characteristics. A study of Varna, Glasgow and Edinburgh. Soc Sci Med 1996; 43: 367–377.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ross CE. Walking, exercising, and smoking: Does neighborhood matter? Soc Sci Med 2000; 51: 265–274.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tseng M, Yeatts K, Millikan R, et al. Area-level characteristics and smoking in women. Am J Public Health 2001; 91: 1847–1850.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karvonen S, Rimpela AH. Urban small area variation in adolescents' health behaviour. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 1089–1098.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Palosuo H. Health-related lifestyles and alienation in Moscow and Helsinki. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51: 1325–1341.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hart C, Ecob R, Smith GD. People, places and coronary heart disease risk factors: A multilevel analysis of the Scottish Heart Health Study archive. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 893–902.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kleinschmidt I, Hills M, Elliott P. Smoking behaviour can be predicted by neighbourhood deprivation measures. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995; 49(Suppl. 2): S72–S77.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wolfe WS, Campbell CC, Frongillo EA Jr, et al. Overweight schoolchildren in New York State: Prevalence and characteristics. AmJ Public Health 1994; 84: 807–813.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hardy R, Wadsworth M, Kuh D. The influence of childhood weight and socioeconomic status on change in adult body mass index in a British national birth cohort. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000; 24: 725–734.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scribner RA, Cohen DA, Fisher W. Evidence of a structural effect for alcohol outlet density: A multilevel analysis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2000; 24: 188–195.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rice N, Carr-Hill R, Dixon P, et al. The influence of households on drinking behaviour: A multilevel analysis. Soc Sci Med 1998; 46: 971–979.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Duncan C, Jones K, Moon G. Smoking and deprivation: Are there neighbourhood effects? Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 497–505.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pickett KE, Pearl M. Multilevel analyses of neighbourhood socioeconomic context and health outcomes: A critical review. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001; 55: 111–122.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Diez-Roux AV. Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. AmJ Public Health 2001; 91: 1783–1789.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Diez-Roux AV. Multilevel analysis in public health research. Ann Rev Public Health 2000; 21: 171–192.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glendinning A, Shucksmith J, Hendry L. Family life and smoking in adolescence. Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 93–101.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peters J, Hedley AJ, Lam TH, et al. A comprehensive study of smoking in primary school children in Hong Kong: Implications for prevention. J Epidemiol Community Health 1997; 51: 239–245.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Diez-Roux AV, Nieto FJ, Muntaner C, et al. Neighborhood environments and coronary heart disease: A multilevel analysis. Am J Epidemiol 1997; 146: 48–63.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Twigg L, Moon G, Jones K. Predicting small-area health-related behaviour: A comparison of smoking and drinking indicators. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50: 1109–1120.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sundquist J, Malmstrom M, Johansson SE. Cardiovascular risk factors and the neighbourhood environment: A multilevel analysis. Int J Epidemiol 1999; 28: 841–845.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reijneveld SA. The impact of individual and area characteristics on urban socioeconomic differences in health and smoking. Int J Epidemiol 1998; 27: 33–40.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Finch BK, Vega WA, Kolody B. Substance use during pregnancy in the state of California, USA. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52: 571–583.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yen IH, Kaplan GA. Poverty area residence and changes in physical activity level: Evidence fromthe Alameda County Study. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 1709–1712.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    van Lenthe FJ, Mackenbach JP. Neighbourhood deprivation and overweight: The GLOBE study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2002; 26: 234–240.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ellaway A, Anderson A, Macintyre S. Does area of residence affect body size and shape? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1997; 21: 304–308.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Karvonen S, Rimpela A. Socio-regional context as a determinant of adolescents’ health behaviour in Finland. Soc Sci Med 1996; 43: 1467–1474.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reijneveld SA, Verheij RA, de Bakker DH. The impact of area deprivation on differences in health: Does the choice of the geographical classification matter? J Epidemiol Community Health 2000; 54: 306–313.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Featherstone M. Lifestyle and consumer culture. Theory, Culture Soc 1987; 4: 55–70.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    INSEE. Inventaire communal 1998. Paris: INSEE, 2001; 167.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kelleher KJ, Rickert VI, Hardin BH, et al. Rurality and gender. Effects on early adolescent alcohol use. Am J Dis Child 1992; 146: 317–322.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Palmer RF, Graham JW, White EL, et al. Applying multilevel analytic strategies in adolescent substance use prevention research. Prev Med 1998; 27: 328–336.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Leyland AH, Goldstein H. Multilevel Modelling of Health Statistics. Chichester: Wiley, 2001.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Snijders T, Bosker R. Multilevel Analysis. An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling. London: Sage publications, 1999.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guilbert P, Baudier F, Gautier A, et al. Baromètre Santé 2000. Méthodes. Vanves: Editions CFES, 2001.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Guilbert P, Baudier F, Gautier A. Baromètre Santé 2000. Résultats. Vanves: Edition CFES, 2001.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Etter JF, Duc TV, Perneger TV. Validity of the Fagerstromtest for nicotine dependence and of the Heaviness of Smoking Index among relatively light smokers. Addiction 1999; 94: 269–281.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rueff B, Crnac J, Darne B. Detection of alcoholic patients using the systematic CAGE autoquestionnaire. In out patients. Presse Med 1989; 18: 1654–1656.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    INSEE. Nomenclature des professions et catégories socioprofessionnelles 1994. Paris: INSEE, 1994.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    OECD. Taxing wages 2000-2001. Paris: OECD, 2001.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Winkleby MA, Jatulis DE, Frank E, et al. Socioeconomic status and health: How education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease. AmJ Public Health 1992; 82: 816–820.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Basile Chaix
    • 1
  • Pierre Chauvin
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Unit in Epidemiology and Information SciencesNational Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM U444)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations