From Recreation to Reflection: Digital conversations in Educational Contexts Article DOI:
Cite this article as: Burnett, C., Dickinson, P., McDonagh, J. et al. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature (2003) 3: 149. doi:10.1023/A:1024540306179 Abstract
The Teacher Training Agency'srecent drive to increase flexibility in InitialTeacher Training provision in the UK hasprompted a growing interest in distancelearning. A number of Higher Educationproviders are now using new technology and newforms of communication in their coursedelivery. Among the various forms available,synchronous online chat, usually associatedwith social or recreational interaction, hasattracted little attention in the researchliterature. This medium requires new approachesand skills as participants struggle to makemeaning in multi-stranded conversations.Building on previous studies that have exploredthe innovative use of language in recreationalchat, this study focuses on student discussionsin the context of educational chat. It exploreshow student teachers can use this electronicenvironment to discuss educational issues, andin so doing, gain experience of thecommunicative potential of new media. Analysisof the ways in which these students uselanguage in this environment is followed bysome initial thoughts about the potential ofsynchronous chat as a medium for learningwithin an educational context. This paperidentifies key elements in the organisation ofeducational chat and provides insight into thestrategies used by participants.
CMC collaborative learning synchronous chat teacher training REFERENCES
Abbot, C. (1998). Making connections: Young people and the Internet. In J. Sefton-Green (Ed.),
Digital diversions: Youth culture in the age of multimedia
(pp. 84-105). London: UCL Press.
Agostinho, S., Lefoe, G. & Hedberg, J. (1997).
Online collaboration for learning: A case study of a post-graduate university course. AESWEB 97 Conference. Retrieved from http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/proceedings/agostinho/index.html on 10 December 2001.
Bakhtin, M. (1981).
The dialogic imagination
. Ed. M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bernard, R. & Lundgren-Caryl, K. (2001). Computer conferencing: An environment for collaborative project-based learning in distance education.
Educational Research and Evaluation, 7
Bernard, R., Rojo de Rubalcava, B. & St-Pierre, D. (2000). Collaborative online distance learning: Issues for future practice and research.
Distance Education, 21
Choi, J. & Hannafin, M. (1995). Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles structures and implications for design.
Educational Technology Research and Development, 43
Condon, S. & Cech, G. (1996). Functional comparison of face to face and computermediated decision-making interactions. In S. Herring (Ed.),
Computer mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives
(pp. 65-81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (Eds) (2000).
Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures
. South Yarra, Australia: Macmillan.
Crystal, D. (2001).
Language and the Internet
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dickinson, P. & Merchant, G. (2001).
Literacy and computer mediated communication-a case study of web-based teacher training. Paper presented to the 8th International Learning Conference, Spetses, Greece.
Goodwin, A. (2000).
English in the digital age
. London: Cassell.
Hedberg, J., Harper, B. & Corrent-Agostinho, S. (1998).
Creating a postgraduate virtual community: Issues for authors and students as authors. AUC Academic Conference: Melbourne. Retrieved from http://www.healthsci.utas.edu.au/auc/ConferencePapers/ papers/harpberg.html on 20 December 2002.
Henri, F. & Lundgren, K. (1997).
Apprentissage collaboratif a distance: Teleconference et telediscussion
. Internal report, Centre LICEF. Montreal: Teleuniversity.
Herring, S. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC.
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4
Kaye, A. (1989). Computer-mediated communication and distance education. In R. Mason & A. Kaye (Eds),
Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education
(pp. 3-21). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Knobel, M. & Lankshear, C. (1999).
Ways of knowing: Researching literacy
. Sydney: Primary Teaching Association.
Luke, C. (2000). Cyber-schooling and technological change: Multiliteracies for new times. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds),
Mulitliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures
(pp. 69-92). South Yarra, Australia: Macmillan.
Merchant, G. (2001). Teenagers in cyberspace: Language use and language change in internet chatrooms.
Journal of Research in Reading, 24
Shortis, T. (2001).
The language of ICT
. London: Routledge.
Shrage, T. (1990).
Shared minds: The new technologies of collaboration
. New York: Random House.
Tamm, M. (2000). Constructivism, instructional design and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning.
Educational Technology and Society, 3
Tvedte, J. & Lysne, S. (2001).
A model for teacher training assisted by information technology
. Washington, DC: SITE 98 International Conference.
Werry, C. (1996). Linguistic and interactional features of internet relay chat. In S. Herring (Ed.),
Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and crosscultural perspectives
(pp. 47-61). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wellman, B. & Gulia, M. (1999). Virtual communities as communities. In M. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds),
Communities in cyberspace
(pp. 169-194). London: Routledge.
Google Scholar Copyright information
© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003