Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 643–658 | Cite as

Defining and Measuring Sexual Orientation: A Review

  • Randall L. Sell
Article

Abstract

How to define and identify sexual orientations for the purpose of constructing representative samples of homosexuals, bisexuals, and heterosexuals is unclear and confusing to researchers. Different definitions and measures have been proposed and used to develop samples since the 1860s when sexual orientations first gained widespread research interest. Unfortunately, the definitions and measurement tools used since men result in the selection of divergent and incomparable samples. If advances in the understanding of sexual orientations are to be made, it is critical that definitions and measures of sexual orientation be standardized. This paper reviews and critiques definitions and measures of sexual orientation mat have been proposed and used by researchers over the past century. This review is intended to further our understanding of this subject and to encourage researchers to be critical of how they classify subjects based upon sexual orientation.

homosexuality sexual orientation definition measurement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Anomaly. (1948). The Invert and His Social Adjustment: To which is Added a Sequel, Bailliere, Tindall and Cox, London.Google Scholar
  2. Beach, F. (1950). Comments on the second dialogue in Corydon. In Gide, A., Corydon, Farrar, Straus, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bem, S. L. (1981). Bem Sex-Role Inventory' Professional Manual, Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Berkey, B. R., Perelman-Hall, T., and Kurdek, L. A. (1990). The multidimensional scale of sexuality. J. Homosex. 19(4): 67–87.Google Scholar
  5. Blumer, G. A. (1882). A case of perverted sexual instinct (contrare sexualempfindung). J. Insanity 39: 22–35.Google Scholar
  6. Boswell, J. (1980). Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  7. Brett, P., Wood, E., and Thomas, G. C. (1994). Queering the Pitch: The New Gay and Lesbian Musicology, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Bullough, V. (1990). The Kinsey Scale in historical perspective. In McWhirter, D. P., Sanders, S. A., and Reinisch, J. M. (eds.), Homosexuality/Heterosexuality: Concepts of Sexual Orientation, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Bullough, V. (1994). Introduction. In The Riddle of Man-Manly Love, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY.Google Scholar
  10. Carpenter, E. (1894). Homogenic Love and Its Place in a Free Society, Labour Press, Manchester, England.Google Scholar
  11. Carpenter, E. (1908). The Intermediate Sex, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  12. Chauncey, G. (1994). Gay New York: Gender Urban Culture, and the Making of the Gay Male World, 1890–1940, HarperCollins, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Coleman, E. (1990). Toward a synthetic understanding of sexual orientation. In McWhirter, D. P., Sanders, S. A., and Reinisch, J. M. (eds.), Homosexuality/Heterosexuality: Concepts of Sexual Orientation, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Cory, D. W. (1951). The Homosexual in America, Greenberg, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Diamond, M. (1993). Homosexuality and Bisexuality in Different Populations. Arch. Sex. Behav. 22: 291–310.Google Scholar
  16. Ellis, H. (1942). Studies in the Psychology of Sex, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Ellis, H., and Symonds J. A. (1896). Sexual Inversion, Wilson and Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  18. Feinberg, D. B. (1994). Queer and Loathing: Rants and Raves of a Raging AIDS Clone, Viking, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Forel, A. (1924). The Sexual Question: A Scientific, Psychological, Hygienic and Sociological Study, Physicians and Surgeons Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Francoeur, R. T., Perper, T., and Scherzer, N. A. (eds). (1991). A Descriptive Dictionary and Atlas of Sexology, Greenwood Press, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Goldberg, J. (ed.). (1994). Queering the Renaissance, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  22. Gonsiorek, J. C., and Weinrich, J. D. (1991). The definition and scope of sexual orientation. In Homosexuality: Research Implications for Public Policy, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  23. Henry, G. W. (1948). Sex Variants: A Study of Homosexual Patterns, Paul B. Hoeber, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Henry, G. W. (1955). All the Sexes: A Study of Masculinity and Femininity, Rinehart, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Hirschfeld, M. (1914). Die Homosexualitat des Mannes und des Weibes, Louis Marcus, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  26. Katz, N. (1992). Gay American History: Lesbians and Gay Men in the United States, Meridian, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., and Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  28. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., and Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual Behavior in the Human Female, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  29. Klein, F., Sepekoff, B., and Wolf, T. J. (1985). Sexual orientation: A multi-variable dynamic process. J. Homosex. 11: 35–49.Google Scholar
  30. Kraft-Ebing, R. V. (1886). Psychopathia Sexualis: Eine Klinisch-Forensische Studie, Enke, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
  31. Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing Research on Sensitive Topics, Sage, London.Google Scholar
  32. Legman, G. (1941). The language of homosexuality: An American glossary. In Henry, G. W., Sex Variants: A Study of Homosexual Patterns, Paul B. Hoeber, New York.Google Scholar
  33. LeVay, S. (1993). The Sexual Brain, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  34. Marmor, J. (1980). Overview: The multiple roots of homosexual behavior. In Marmor, J. (ed.), Homosexual Sexual Behavior: A Modern Reappraisal, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Masters, W. H., and Johnson, V. E. (1979). Homosexuality in Perspective, Little, Brown, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  36. Masters, W. H., Johnson, V. E., and Kolodny, R. C. (1988). Human Sexuality: Third Edition, Scott, Foresman, Glenview, IL.Google Scholar
  37. Mayne, X. (1908). The Intersexes: A History of Similsexualism as a Problem in Social Life, Privately printed, Paris.Google Scholar
  38. Mercer, J. D. (1959). They Walk in Shadow: A Study of Sexual Variations with Emphasis on the Ambisexual and Homosexual Components and Our Contemporary Sex Laws, Comet Press, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Moll, A. (1891). Die Kontrare Geschlechtsempfindung, Fischer's Medicin, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  40. Plato (1993). The Symposium and The Phaedrus, State of New York Press, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
  41. Potter, L. A. F. (1933). Strange Loves: A Study in Sexual Abnormalities, Robert Dodsely, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Robinson, V. (ed.). (1936). Encyclopedia Sexualis. Dingwall-Rock, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Sambrooks, J. E., and MacCulloch, M. J. (1973). A modification of the Sexual Orientation Method and automated technique for presentation and scoring. Brit. J. Social Clin. Psychol. 12: 163–174.Google Scholar
  44. Sell, R. L. (submitted for publication). The validity and reliability of the Sell Assessment of Sexual Orientation.Google Scholar
  45. Sell, R. L., and Petrulio, C. (1995). Sampling homosexuals, bisexuals, gays and lesbians for public health research: A review of the literature from 1990–1992. J. Homosex. 30: 31–47.Google Scholar
  46. Shaw, J. C., and Ferris, G. N. (1883). Perverted sexual instinct. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 10: 185–204.Google Scholar
  47. Shively, M. G., Jones, C., and DeCecco, J. P. (1985). Research on sexual orientation: Definitions and methods. In DeCecco, J. P., and Shively, M. G. (eds.), Origins of Sexuality and Homosexuality, Harrington Park Press, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Shively, M. G., and DeCecco, J. P. (1977). Components of sexual identity. J. Homosexuality 3: 41–48.Google Scholar
  49. Signorle, M. (1993). Queer in America, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  50. Stedman's Medical Dictionary. (1982). Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  51. Storms, M. D. (1980). Theories of sexual orientation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38: 783–792.Google Scholar
  52. Streiner, D. L., and Norman, G. R. (1989). Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  53. Sudman, S. (1976). Applied Sampling, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Symonds, J. A. (1883). A Problem in Greek Ethics, Privately Printed, London.Google Scholar
  55. Symonds, J. A. (1891). A Problem in Modern Ethics, Privately Printed, London.Google Scholar
  56. Tentler, T. N. (1977). Sin and Confession on the Eve of the Reformation, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  57. Ulrichs, K. H. (1994). The Riddle of Man-Manly Love, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY.Google Scholar
  58. Weinberg, M. S., Williams, C. J., and Pryor, D. W. (1994). Dual Attraction, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  59. Weinrich, J. D. (1994). Homosexuality. In Bullough, V. L., and Bullough, B. (eds.), Human Sexuality: An Encyclopedia, Garland, New York.Google Scholar
  60. Weinrich, J. D. (1990). The Kinsey Scale in biology, with a note on Kinsey as a biologist. In McWhirter, D. P., Sanders, S. A., and Reinisch, J. M. (eds.), Homosexuality,: Concepts of Sexual Orientation, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  61. Weinrich, J. D., Snyder, P. J., Pillard, R. C., Grant, I., Jacobson, D. L., Robinson, S. R., and McCutchan, J. A. (1993). A factor analysis of the Klein Sexual Orientation Grid in two disparate samples. Arch. Sex. Behav. 22: 157–168.Google Scholar
  62. West, D. J. (1977). Homosexuality Re-examined, Gerald Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
  63. Westphal, K. (1869). Die Kontrare Sexualempfindung: Symptom eines neuropathologischen (psychopathischen) Zustandes. Arch. Psychiat. Nervenkrank. 2: 73–108.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randall L. Sell
    • 1
  1. 1.Columbia University School of Public HealthNew York

Personalised recommendations