Advertisement

Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 201–233 | Cite as

Impacts of Home-Based Telework on Quality of Life for Employees and Their Partners. Quantitative and Qualitative Results From a European Survey

  • Joar VittersøEmail author
  • Sigmund Akselsen
  • Bente Evjemo
  • Tom Erik Julsrud
  • Birgitte Yttri
  • Svein Bergvik
Article

Abstract

The study investigates the effects of home-based telework on quality of life (QoL). Four dimensions of QoL were analysed; overall satisfaction with life, sense of belonging, sense of becoming and sense of being. Through cross-national survey data (from 217 job holders and 112 partners) and by means of structural equation modeling, a positive association was found between home-based telework to a worker's sense of belonging (beta = 0.30, p < 0.001). On the other hand, a negative path was detected from the job holder's home-based telework to his or her partner's overall satisfaction with life (beta = −0.27, p < 0.05). After controlling for subdimensions of life quality, home-based work did not affect the job holder's overall life satisfaction. Moreover, the more concentration the job holder reported, the lower the sense of belonging was reported by his or her partner (beta = −0.28, p < 0.05). No simple explanation for the negative effects were found, but our interviews with the group of workers and their families leave us the impression that the problem of overworking and withdrawal was most relevant to the cases, in combination with negative spill-over effects and unclear boundary settings in the home.

home-based telework family quality of life satisfaction with life. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akselsen, S., T. Bjarnason, A.R. Bjornsdottir, D. Diduca, B. Evjemo, E. France, S. Gunnarsdóttir, M. Jones, A. Jonsdottir, T.E. Julsrud, R. Marion, M.P. Martins, F.C. Pinto, B. Theodorsdottir, K. Tracey and B. Yttri: 2001, Telework and life quality – Basic concepts and main results. (EURESCOMHeidelberg) (pp. http://www.eurescom.de/public/projects/p900-series/p904/p904.htm).Google Scholar
  2. Akselsen, S., T. Bjarnason, D. Diduca, B. Evjemo, E. France, S. Gunnarsdóttir, M. Jones, A. Jonsdottir, T.E. Julsrud, R. Marion, M.P. Martins, F.C. Pinto, K. Tracey and B. Yttri: 2003, ‘The impacts of telework on quality of life. A revised model for research’, in P. Jackson and B. Rapp (eds.), Organisation and Work Beyond 2000 (Springer-Verlag, London).Google Scholar
  3. Akselsen, S., T. Bjarnason, D. Diduca, B. Evjemo, E. France, S. Gunnarsdóttir, M. Jones, A. Jonsdottir, T.E. Juisrud, R. Marion, M.P. Martins, F.C. Pinto, K. Tracey and B. Yttri: 2003, ‘The impacts of telework on quality of life. A revised model for research’, in P. Jackson and B. Rapp (eds.), Organisation and Work Beyond 2000 (Springer-Verlag, London).Google Scholar
  4. Bandolas, D.L.: 2002, ‘The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling’, Structural Equation Modeling 9, pp. 78–102.Google Scholar
  5. Bentler, P.M.: 1980, ‘Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling’, Annual Review of Psychology 31, pp. 419–456.Google Scholar
  6. Bentler, P.: 1995, EQS Structural Equations Program Manual (Multivariate Software, Inc, Encino, CA).Google Scholar
  7. Bollen, K.A.: 1989, Structural Equations with Latent Variables (JohnWiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  8. Bollen, K.A.: 2002, ‘Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences’, Annual Review of Psychology 53, pp. 605–634.Google Scholar
  9. Borkenau, P. and M. Amelang: 1985, ‘The control of social desirability in personality inventories: A study using the principal-factor deletion technique’, Journal of Research in Personality 19, pp. 44–53.Google Scholar
  10. Brooke, P.P. and J.L. Price: 1989, ‘The determinants of employee absenteeism: an empirical test of a causal model’, Journal of Occupational Psychology 62, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, I., D. Raphael and R. Renwick: 1996, Quality of Life Profile (Centre for Health Promotion, Toronto).Google Scholar
  12. Brynin, M., B. Anderson and B. Yttri: 2002, e-living-D7.5-Homeworking-and-Teleworking-Issue-1.1. Deliverable from “e-Living – Life in a Digital Europe: an EU Fifth Framework IST Project [IST-2000-25409]”. Available from http://www.eurescom.de/e-living/Google Scholar
  13. Castells, M.: 1996, The Rise of the Network Society (Blackwell, Malden, MA).Google Scholar
  14. Cliff, N.: 1988, ‘The Eigenvalue-Greater-Than-One rule and the reliability of components’, Psychological Bulletin 103, pp. 276–279.Google Scholar
  15. Cowen, E.L.: 1991, ‘In pursuit of wellness’, American Psychologist 46, pp. 404–408.Google Scholar
  16. Cummins, R.A.: 2000, ‘Objective and subjective quality of life:Aninteractive model’, Social Indicators Research 52, pp. 55–72.Google Scholar
  17. Daniels, K.: 2000. ‘Job features and well-being’, in K. Daniels, D. Lamond and P. Standen (eds.), Managing Telework. Perspectives from Human Resource Management and Work Psychology, pp. 73–82.Google Scholar
  18. Deetz, S.A.: 1992, Democracy in the Age of Corporate Colonization: Developments in Communication and the Politics of Everyday Life (State University of New York, Albany).Google Scholar
  19. Diener, E. and E. Suh: 1997, ‘Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators’, Social Indicators Research 40, pp. 189–216.Google Scholar
  20. Diener, E. and E.M. Suh: 1999, ‘National differences in subjective well-being’, in D. Kahneman, E. Diener and N. Schwarz (eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), pp. 436–452.Google Scholar
  21. Drucker, P.: 1994, Post-Capitalist Society (Harper Business, London).Google Scholar
  22. Duxbury, L., C. Higgins and D. Neufeld: 1998, ‘Telework and the balance between work and family: Is telework part of the problem or part of the solution’, in M. Igbaria and M. Tan (eds.), The Virtual Workplace (Idea Group Publishing, Hersey, PA), pp. 218–255.Google Scholar
  23. ECaTT: 2000, Electronic Commerce and Telework Trends consortium's final report entitled ‘Benchmarking Progress on New Ways of Working and New Forms of Business Across Europe’, available from http://www.ecatt.com/ecatt/. (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities Luxemburg.)Google Scholar
  24. Fernández-Ballesteros, R.: 1998, ‘Quality of life: Concept and assessment’, in J.G. Adair, D. Bélanger and K.L. Dion (eds.), Advances in Psychological Science-Congress Proceedings, XXVI International Congress of Psychology, Montréal, 1996, Vol. 1 (Psychological Press, Hove, UK), pp. 387–406.Google Scholar
  25. France, E., S. Akselsen, M. Jones and K. Tracey: 2002, ‘Telework and Quality of Life: Some social impacts and practical implications’, Journal of the British Telecommunications Engineers 3, pp. 57–66.Google Scholar
  26. Gallup: 2001, Gallup Work-life Study 2001. Iceland.Google Scholar
  27. Gareis, K. 2002. The intensity of telework in 2002 in the EU, Switzerland and the USA. Paper presented at the conference “eWork in Europe 2002”, Paris (25–27 September 2002). Available from http://www.sibiseu. org/sibis/publications/articles.htm.Google Scholar
  28. Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott and M. Trowet: 1994, The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies (Sage, London).Google Scholar
  29. Gorsuch, R.L.: 1983, Factor Analysis (2nd edn) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
  30. Gray, M., N. Hodson and G. Gordon: 1993, Teleworking Explained (John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester).Google Scholar
  31. Gustafsson, J.-E. and G. Balke: 1993, ‘General and specific abilities as predictors of school achievement’, Multivariate Behavioral Research 28, pp. 407–434.Google Scholar
  32. Hackman, J.R. and G.R. Oldham: 1980, Work Design (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).Google Scholar
  33. Hamblin, H.: 1995, ‘Employees' perspectives on one dimension of labour flexibility: Working at a distance’, Work, Employment & Society 9(3), pp. 473–498.Google Scholar
  34. Haybron, D.M.: 2000, ‘Two philosophical problems in the study of happiness’, Journal of Happiness Studies 1, pp. 207–225.Google Scholar
  35. Hochschild, A.R.: 1997, The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work (Metropolitan Books, New York).Google Scholar
  36. Huws, U., W.B. Korte and S. Robinson: 1990, Telework. Towards the Elusive Office (Empirica, Chichester).Google Scholar
  37. Jacob, S.G. and F.K. Willits: 1994, ‘Objective and subjective indicators of community evaluation: A Pennsylvania assessment’, Social Indicators Research 32, pp. 161–177.Google Scholar
  38. Julsrud, T.: 1999. The silent transformation of the workplace – Distribution of Norwegian teleworkers 1995–1998. Telektronikk, 95(4), pp. 10–21.Google Scholar
  39. Kaiser, H.F.: 1974, ‘An index of factorial simplicity’, Psychometrika 39, pp. 31–36.Google Scholar
  40. Kammann, R., M. Farry and P. Herbison: 1984, ‘The analysis and measurement of happiness as a sense of well-being’, Social Indicators Research 15, pp. 91–115.Google Scholar
  41. Kishton, J.M. and K.F. Widaman: 1994, ‘Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items. An emprical example’, Educational and Psychological Measurement 54, pp. 757–765.Google Scholar
  42. Kline, R.B.: 1998, Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Guilford Press, New York).Google Scholar
  43. Lane, R.E.: 1996, ‘Quality of life and quality of persons:Anewrole for government?’, in A. Offer (ed.), In Pursuit of the Quality of Life (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 256–293.Google Scholar
  44. Lane, R.E.: 2000, The Loss of Happiness in Market Democracies (Yale University Press, London).Google Scholar
  45. Lerner, S.: 1997, ‘Indicators of human well-being: Fine-tuning vs. taking action?’, Social Indicators Research 40, pp. 217–220.Google Scholar
  46. Little, T.D., A.W. Cunningham, G. Shahar and K.F. Widaman: 2002, ‘To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits’, Structural Equation Modeling 9, pp. 151–173.Google Scholar
  47. MacCallum, R.C., M. Roznowski and L.B. Necowitz: 1992, ‘Model modification in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance’, Psychological Bulletin 111, pp. 490–504.Google Scholar
  48. Mingione, E.: 1994, ‘Life strategies and social economies in the postfordist age’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 18, pp. 24–45.Google Scholar
  49. Moum, T.: 1992, ‘Needs, rights and indicators on quality of life research’, in T. Moum (ed.), Quality of Life and Health in the General Population – Philosophy, Methods and Empirical Issues (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oslo).Google Scholar
  50. Mulaik, S.A. and R.E. Millsap: 2000, ‘Doing the four-step right’, Structural Equation Modeling 7, pp. 36–73.Google Scholar
  51. Mulaik, S.A. and D.A. Quartetti: 1997, ‘First order or higher order general factor?’, Structural Equation Modeling 4, pp. 193–211.Google Scholar
  52. Naisbitt, J.: 1994, Global Paradox (William Morrow, New York).Google Scholar
  53. Nilles, J.: 1994, Making Telecommuting Happen. A Guide for Telemanagers and Telecommuters (Van Norstrad Reinhold, New York.).Google Scholar
  54. Nippert-Eng, C.: 1996, Home and Work. Negotiating Boundaries through Everyday Life (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).Google Scholar
  55. Nonaka, I. and T. Takeuchi: 1995, The Knowledge-Creating Company (Oxford University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  56. Olson, G.I. and B.I. Schober: 1993, ‘The satisfied poor. Development of an intervention-oriented theoretical framework to explain satisfaction with a life in poverty’, Social Indicators Research 28, pp. 173–193.Google Scholar
  57. Pearl, J.: 2000, Causality (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
  58. Perlow, L.A.: 1998, ‘Boundary control: The social ordering of work and family time in a high-tech corporation’, Administrative Science Quarterly 43, pp. 328–357.Google Scholar
  59. Raphael, D.: 1996, ‘Defining quality of life. Eleven debates concerning its measurement’, in R. Renwick, I. Brown and M. Nagler (eds.), Quality of Life in Health Promotion and Rehabilitation. Conceptual Approaches, Issues, and Applications (Sage, London), pp. 146–165.Google Scholar
  60. Raphael, D., J. Waalen and A. Karabanow: 2001, ‘Factor analytic properties of the quality of life profile: Examination of the nine subdomain quality of life model’, Psychological Reports 88, pp. 265–276.Google Scholar
  61. Renwick, R. and I. Brown: 1996, ‘The centre for health promotion's conceptual approach to quality of life’, in R. Renwick, I. Brown and M. Nagler (eds.), Quality of Life in Health Promotion and Rehabilitation. Conceptual Approaches, Issues, and Applications (Sage, London), pp. 75–86.Google Scholar
  62. Ringen, S.: 1995, ‘Well-being, measurement and preferences’, Acta Sociologica 38, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
  63. Rubio, D.M., M.B. Weger and S.S. Tebb: 2001, ‘Using structural equation modeling to test for multidimensionality’, Structural Equation Modeling 8, pp. 613–616.Google Scholar
  64. Schwarz, N. and F. Strack: 2000, ‘Reports of subjective well-being: Judgemental processes and their methodological implications’, in D. Kahneman, E. Diener and N. Schwarz (eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (Russell Sage Foundation, New York), pp. 61–84.Google Scholar
  65. Shipley, B.: 2000, Cause and Correlation in Biology. A Users Guide to Path Analysis, Structural Equations and Causal Inference (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).Google Scholar
  66. Spirites, P., C. Glymour and R. Scheines: 2000, Causation, Prediction, and Search (The MIT Press, London).Google Scholar
  67. Toffler, A.: 1980, The Third Wave (Morrow, New York).Google Scholar
  68. TWA: 2000. Telework America 2000 Survey. Conducted by Jack Nilles.Key Findings are available from web site of the International Telework Association and Council at http://www.telecommute.org/twa2000/research results key.shtml.Google Scholar
  69. Van Dyne, L., J.W. Graham and R.M. Dienesch: 1994, ‘Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation’, Academy of Management Journal 37, pp. 765–802.Google Scholar
  70. Van Sell, M. and S.M. Jacobs: 1994, ‘Telecommuting and the quality of life: A review of the literature and a model for research’, Telematics and Informatics 11, pp. 81–95.Google Scholar
  71. Veenhoven, R.: 1998, ‘Quality-of-life and happiness: Not quite the same’, in G. DeGirolamo et al. (eds.), Health and Quality-of-Life (Il Pensierro Scientifico (in press), Rome).Google Scholar
  72. Veenhoven, R.: 2000, ‘The four qualities of life. Ordering concepts and measures of the good life’, Journal of Happiness Studies 1, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
  73. Velicer, W.F. and J.L. Fava: 1998, ‘Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery’, Psychological Methods 3, pp. 231–251.Google Scholar
  74. Vittersø, J.: 2003, ‘Flow versus life satisfaction: A projective use of cartoons to illustrate the difference between the evaluation approach and the intrinsic motivation approach to subjective quality of life’, Journal of Happiness Studies this issue.Google Scholar
  75. Vittersø, J. and F. Nilsen: 2002, ‘The conceptual and relational structure of subjective well-being, neuroticism, and extraversion: Neuroticism is again found to be the important predictor of happiness’, Social Indicators Research 57, pp. 89–118.Google Scholar
  76. Warr, P.: 1994, ‘A conceptual framework for the study of work and mental health’, Work and Stress 8, pp. 84–97.Google Scholar
  77. Watten, R.G., O. Vassend, J.-L. Syversen and T. Myhrer: 1995, ‘Personality and quality of life’, Social Indicators Research 35, pp. 289–302.Google Scholar
  78. WHOQOL and group: 1998, ‘Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment’, Psychological Medicine 28, pp. 551–558.Google Scholar
  79. Williams, K.: 1988, Technologies of Control. The New Interactive Media for the Home (University of Wisconsin Press, London).Google Scholar
  80. Williams, K.J. and G.M. Alliger: 1994, ‘Role stressors, mood spillover, and perceptions of work-family conflict in employed parents’, Academy of Management Journal 37, pp. 837–868.Google Scholar
  81. Wright, S.: 1921, ‘Correlation and causation’, Journal of Agricultural Research 10, pp. 557–585.Google Scholar
  82. Wright, T. A., D.G. Bonnett and D.A. Sweeney: 1993, ‘Mental health and work performance: Results of a longitudinal field study’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 66, pp. 277–84.Google Scholar
  83. Zedeck, S.: 1992, Exploring the Domain of Work and Family Concerns. Work, Families and Organizations (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).Google Scholar
  84. Zerubavel, E.: 1991, The Fine Line. Making Distinctions in Everyday Life (The Free Press, New York).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joar Vittersø
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sigmund Akselsen
  • Bente Evjemo
  • Tom Erik Julsrud
  • Birgitte Yttri
  • Svein Bergvik
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TromsoTromso

Personalised recommendations