Journal of Economic Growth

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 155–194

Fractionalization

  • Alberto Alesina
  • Arnaud Devleeschauwer
  • William Easterly
  • Sergio Kurlat
  • Romain Wacziarg
Article

DOI: 10.1023/A:1024471506938

Cite this article as:
Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W. et al. Journal of Economic Growth (2003) 8: 155. doi:10.1023/A:1024471506938

Abstract

We provide new measures of ethnic, linguistic, and religious fractionalization for about 190 countries. These measures are more comprehensive than those previously used in the economics literature and we compare our new variables with those previously used. We also revisit the question of the effects of ethnic, linguistic, and religious heterogeneity on the quality of institutions and growth. We partly confirm and partly modify previous results. The patterns of cross-correlations between potential explanatory variables and their different degree of endogeneity makes it hard to make unqualified statements about competing explanations for economic growth and the quality of government. Our new data, which features the underlying group structure of ethnicities, religions and languages, also allows the computation of alternative measures of heterogeneity, and we turn to measures of polarization as an alternative to the commonly used index of fractionalization.

ethnic heterogeneity growth government quality 

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Alesina
    • 1
  • Arnaud Devleeschauwer
    • 1
  • William Easterly
    • 2
  • Sergio Kurlat
    • 3
  • Romain Wacziarg
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.New York University and Center for Global DevelopmentNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.The World BankWashingtonUSA
  4. 4.Stanford Graduate School of BusinessStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations