Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 217–231 | Cite as

Butterfly Communities of Urban Forest Fragments in Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil: Structure, Instability, Environmental Correlates, and Conservation

Article

Abstract

A comparative study of butterfly communities in 15 urban/suburban remnants of tropical semideciduous forest in Campinas (São Paulo state, SE Brazil; 24°S, 47°W), with areas from 1.0 to 252 ha and widely varying histories and environments, shows that the most significant factors, besides area and sampling time, distinguishing the sites and influencing their diversity (80–702 species) and composition are connectivity, permanent water, vegetation, flowers, and human impact (negative, including pollution). The diversified Nymphalidae butterflies (38–213 species) and especially two fermented-bait-attracted groups (Satyrinae, 2–30 species, and Biblidini, 9–44 species), are among the more useful indicators of the quality and diversity of the environments in these fragments. Effective conservation of butterfly communities in tropical cities may be achieved by maintenance of arboreal green corridors along streets and watercourses between moderately large (>10 ha) humid areas, not near to the most built-up or polluted city centre(s), and the inclusion within these areas of ponds or streams, diversified native forest, and open vegetation including abundant nectar-rich flowers.

butterfly communities conservation management multivariate environmental analyses species persistence tropical urban parks 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Accacio, G. (1997) Borboletas em parques urbanos: Estudos na cidade de São Paulo. Master's Dissertation: Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo, iii + 136 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Alkutkar, A., Athalye, P., Adhikari, S., Ranade, A., Patwardhan, M., Kunte, K. and Patwardhan, A. (2001) Diversity of trees and butterflies in forest fragments around Pune city. In Tropical ecosystems: Structure, diversity and human welfare (K.N. Ganeshaiah, R. Uma Shaankar and K.S. Bawa, eds), pp. 685–8. New Delhi: Oxford-IBH.Google Scholar
  3. Brown Jr., K.S. (1972) Maximizing daily butterfly counts. J. Lepid. Soc. 26, 183–96.Google Scholar
  4. Brown Jr., K.S. (1991) Conservation of Neotropical environments: Insects as indicators. In The conservation of insects and their habitats (N.M. Collins and J.A. Thomas, eds), pp. 349–404. London: Academic Press/Royal Entomological Society.Google Scholar
  5. Brown Jr., K.S. (1992) Borboletas da Serra do Japi: Diversidade, habitats, recursos alimentares e variação temporal. In Historia natural da Serra do Japi: Ecologia e preservação de uma área florestal no sudeste do Brasil (L.P.C. Morellato, ed), pp. 142–86. Campinas, SP: Editora da Unicamp.Google Scholar
  6. Brown Jr., K.S. (1997) Diversity, disturbance, and sustainable use of Neotropical forests: Insects as indicators for conservation monitoring. J. Insect. Conserv. 1, 25–42.Google Scholar
  7. Brown Jr., K.S., Damman, A.J. and Feeny, P. (1981) Troidine swallow tails (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in Southeastern Brazil: natural history and foodplant relationships. J. Res. Lepid 19, 199–226.Google Scholar
  8. Brown Jr., K.S. and Freitas, A.V.L. (2000) Atlantic Forest butterflies: Indicators for landscape conservation. Biotropica 32(4b), 934–56.Google Scholar
  9. Brown Jr., K.S., Klitzke, C.F., Berlingeri, C. and Rubbo dos Santos, P.E. (1995) Neotropical swallowtails: Chemistry of food plant relationships, population ecology, and biosystematics. In Swallowtail butterflies: Their ecology and evolutionary biology (J.M. Scriber, Y. Tsubaki and R.C. Lederhouse, eds), pp. 405–45. Gainesville, Florida: Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Cardoso, A. 1949. Lepidópteros de Alagoas. Rev. Entomol. 20, 427–36.Google Scholar
  11. CETEC. 2000. Situação dos Recursos H´?dricos das Bacias Hidrográficas dos Rios Piracicaba, Capivari e Jundiaî. Relatório Técnico Final. Centro Tecnológico da Fundação Paulista de Tecnologia e Educação /Comitê das Bacias do Piracicaba, Capivari e Jundiaí, 2000 (http://www.comitepcj.sp.gov.br/).Google Scholar
  12. Ehrlich, P.R. (1980) The strategy of conservation, 1980-2000. In Conservation biology - an evolutionary-ecological perspective (M.E. Soulé and B.M. Wilcox, eds), pp. 329–344. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
  13. Fortunato, L. and Ruszczyk, A. (1997) Comunidades de Lepidopteros frugívoras em áreas verdes urbanas e extraurbanas de Uberlândia, MG. Revta. Bras. Biol. 57, 79–87.Google Scholar
  14. Francini, R.B., Freitas, A.V.L. and Brown Jr., K.S. (2000) Lepidoptera do Estado de São Paulo: diversidade, distribuição, recursos, e uso na análise e monitoramento ambiental (http://genesis.unisantos.com.br/biotasp/)Google Scholar
  15. Freitas, A.V.L., Francini, R.B. and Brown Jr., K.S. (2002) Insetos como indicadores ambientais. In Manual Brasileiro em Biologia da Conservação (L. Cullen, R. Rudran and C. Valladares-P´adua, eds), in press. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  16. Garcia, M.A. (1991) Arthropods in a tropical corn field: Effects of weeds and insecticides on community composition. In Plant-animal interactions: Evolutionary ecology in tropical and temperate regions (P.W. Price, T.M. Lewinsohn, G.W. Fernándes and W.W. Benson, eds), pp. 619–34. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Hobbs, E.R. (1988) Species richness in urban forest patches and implications for urban landscape diversity. Landscape Ecol. 1, 141–52.Google Scholar
  18. Kesselring, J. and Ebert, H. (1982) Relação das borboletas encontradas na ‘Mata do Buraquinho,’ João Pessoa, Estado do Paraíba, Brasil. Revta. Nordestina Biol. 2, 105–18.Google Scholar
  19. Kunte, K. (2000-2001) Butterfly diversity of Pune city along the human impact gradient. J. Ecol. Soc. 13/14, 40–5.Google Scholar
  20. Kunte, K., Joglekar, A., Utkarsch, G. and Padmanabhan, P. (1999) Patterns of butterfly, bird, and tree diversity in theWestern Ghats. Curr. Sci. (India) 77, 577–86.Google Scholar
  21. Laurance, W. and Bierregaard, R.O., eds (1997) Tropical forest remnants. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, xv+616 pp.Google Scholar
  22. McCune, B. and Mefford, M.J. (1997) Multivariate analysis of ecological data, Version 3.11. Gleneden Beach, OR, USA: MJM Software.Google Scholar
  23. McIntyre, N. (2000) Ecology of urban arthropods: A review and a call to action. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93, 825–35.Google Scholar
  24. Morais, A.B.B. and Brown Jr., K.S. (1992) Larval foodplant and other effects on Troidini guild composition (Papilionidae) in southeastern Brazil. J. Res. Lepid. 30, 19–37.Google Scholar
  25. Morellato, P.C. and Leitão Filho, H.F., orgs. (1995) Ecologia e preservação de uma floresta tropical urbana - Reserva de Santa Genebra. Campinas, SP, Brazil: Editora da UNICAMP.Google Scholar
  26. Owen, D.F. (1971) Tropical butterflies: The ecology and behavior of butterflies in the tropics with special reference to African species. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  27. Paoletti, M.G., Pimentel, D., Stinner, B.R. and Stinner, D. (1992) Agroecosystem biodiversity: Matching production and conservation biology. Agri., Ecosyst. Environ. 40, 3–23.Google Scholar
  28. Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M.L., Grove, J.M., Nilon, C.H., Pouyat, R.V., Zipperer, W.L. and Constanza, R. (2001) Urban ecological systems: Linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socio-economic components of metropolitan areas. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32, 127–57.Google Scholar
  29. Raven, P.H. (1988) Our diminishing tropical forests. In Biodiversity (E.O. W ilson, ed), pp. 119–22. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  30. Rodrigues, J.J.S., Brown Jr., K.S. and Ruszczyk, A. (1993) Resources and conservation of Neotropical butterflies in urban forest fragments. Biol. Conserv. 64, 3–9.Google Scholar
  31. Ruszczyk, A. (1986a) Hábitos alimentares de borboletas adultas e sua adaptabilidade ao ambiente urbano. Rev. Brasil. Biol. 46, 419–27.Google Scholar
  32. Ruszczyk, A. (1986b) Organização das comunidades de borboletas (Lepidoptera) nas principais avenidas de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul. Revta. Brasil. Entomol. 30, 265–9.Google Scholar
  33. Ruszczyk, A. (1986c) Mortality of Papilio scamander scamander (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) pupae in four districts of Porto Alegre (S. Brazil) and the causes of superabundance of some butterflies in urban areas. Revta. Brasil. Biol. 46, 567–79.Google Scholar
  34. Ruszczyk, A. (1986d) Ecologia urbana de borboletas, I. O gradiente de urbanização e a fauna de Porto Alegre, RS. Revta. Brasil. Biol. 46, 675–88.Google Scholar
  35. Ruszczyk, A. (1986e) Ecologia urbana de borboletas, II. Papilionidae, Pieridae e Nymphalidae em Porto Alegre, RS. Revta. Brasil. Biol. 46, 689–706.Google Scholar
  36. Ruszczyk, A. (1987) Distribution and abundance of butterflies in the urbanization zones of Porto Alegre, Brazil. J. Res. Lepid. 25, 157–78.Google Scholar
  37. Ruszczyk, A. and Araujo, A.M. (1992) Gradients in butterfly species diversity in an urban area in Brazil. J. Lepid. Soc. 46, 255–64.Google Scholar
  38. Santin, D.A. (1999) A vegetação remanescente do município de Campinas (SP). Mapeamento, caracterização fisionômica e florística visando a conservação. Doctoral Thesis: UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil: xviii + 199 pp., 4 anexos (Map; 163 pp.; 3 pp.+178 sites×478 species matrix; 70 pp.). UNICAMP Press, thesis number 38966-7.Google Scholar
  39. Shapiro, A. (2000) The California urban butterfly fauna is dependent on alien plants. Divers. Distr. 8, 31–40.Google Scholar
  40. Shapiro, A.M. and Shapiro, A.R. (1973) The ecological associations of the butterflies of Staten Island. J. Res. Lepid. 12, 65–128.Google Scholar
  41. Statsoft Inc. (1995) Statistica for windows [Computer Progam Manual], Tulsa, OK, USA.Google Scholar
  42. Ter Braak, C.J.F. and Smilauer, D. (1999) Canoco for windows, version 4.02, The Netherlands: Centre for Biometry.Wageningen.Google Scholar
  43. Tyler, H., Brown Jr., K.S. and Wilson, K.H. (1994) Swallowtail butterflies of the Americas: A study in biological dynamics, ecological diversity, biosystematics, and conservation. Gainesville, FL: Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
  44. Vanini, F., Bonato, V. and Freitas, A.V.L. (1999) Polyphenism and population biology of Eurema elathea (Pieridae) in a disturbed environment in tropical Brazil. J. Lepid. Soc. 53, 159–68.Google Scholar
  45. Whitmore, T.C. and Sayer, J.A. (1992) Tropical deforestation and species extinction. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith S. BrownJr.
    • 1
  • André Victor L. Freitas
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Zoologia and Museu de História Natural, Instituto de BiologiaUniversidade Estadual de CampinasCampinas, São PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations