Landscape Ecology

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 159–171

Land use, land cover changes and coastal lagoon surface reduction associated with urban growth in northwest Mexico

  • Arturo Ruiz-Luna
  • César A. Berlanga-Robles


Coastal land use and land cover changes, emphasizing the alterations of coastal lagoons, were assessed in northwest Mexico using satellite imagery processing. Supervised classifications of a Landsat series (1973–1997) and the coefficients Kappa (K) and Tau (τ), were used to assess the area and verify the accuracy of the classification of six informational classes (urban area, aquatic systems, mangrove, agriculture, natural vegetation, and aquaculture). Pixel-by-pixel change detection among dates was evaluated using the Kappa Index of Agreement (KIA). Besides the overall estimation of the aquatic systems class, variations in the three lagoons present in the study area were analyzed individually. Measures of agreement between the classification and reference data indicate that the accuracy for the classification ranked from moderate to high (K = 0.76 ± 0.07; τ = 0.77 ± 0.06). From 1973 to 1997 urban area has doubled, growing to the north and the northeast, extending mainly over natural vegetation and agricultural land. La Escopama and El Sabalo, two of the lagoons studied, reduced their size to less than half that estimated in 1973, but the main estuarine system in the study area, Estero de Urias - El Infiernillo, has maintained its area without noticeable changes. However, the surrounding landscape in Estero de Urias - Infiernillo is changing from natural vegetation and agriculture to urban land use. Consequently, to limit as much as possible changes in the area to natural causes, some management measures must be considered to design urban development plans and to recover and preserve the natural areas, on a broad scale rather than a local spatial scale.

Coastal lagoons Cumulative impact LULC Remote sensing Urban development 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bailly B. and Nowell D. 1996. Techniques for monitoring coastal changes: a review and case study. Ocean and Coastal Manage-ment 32: 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bedford B.L. 1999. Cumulative effects on wetland landscapes: links to wetland restoration in the United States and southern Canada. Wetlands 19: 775–788.Google Scholar
  3. Beraud L.J.L. 1996. Historical actors of the urbanization of Maza-tlan(in Spanish). DIFOCUR. Government of Sinaloa, Culia-can, Sinaloa, Mexico, 218 p.Google Scholar
  4. Berlanga R.C.A. 1999. Evaluation of the current conditions and landscape changes in the wetlands of the south coast of Sinaloa, Mexico: an approach with remote sensing data (in Spanish). MSc Thesis, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), México, 111 p.Google Scholar
  5. Brondizio E.S., Moran E.F., Mausel P. and Wu Y. 1994. Land use change in the Amazon estuary: Patterns of Caboclo settlement and landscape management. Human Ecology 22: 249–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Congalton R.G. and Green K. 1999. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 180 p.Google Scholar
  7. Cuaron A.D. 2000. Effects of land-cover changes on mammals in a neotropical region: a modeling approach. Conservation Biology 14: 1676–1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De la Garza S.R., Macias M.A., Pérez P.R. and Sanchez M.M.A. 1985. Algunos aspectos ecológicos de la ictiofauna del estero “El Sabalo” con un estudio sobre la alimentación de Centropo-mus 1robalito Jordan y Gilbert. Esc. Ciencias del Mar. Profes-sional Thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, México, 110 p.Google Scholar
  9. Eastman J.R. 1995. IDRISI for WINDOWS. User's guide. IDRISI Production. Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA, 120 p.Google Scholar
  10. Green E.P., Mumby P.J., Edwards A.J. and Clark C.D. 1996. A re-view of remote sensing for the assessment and management of tropical coastal resources. Coastal Management 24: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grignetti A., Salvatori R., Casacchia R. and Manes F. 1997. Medi-terranean vegetation analysis by multi-temporal satellite sensor data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 18: 1307–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grimm N.B., Grove J.M., Picket S.T.A. and Redman C.L. 2000. Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. BioScience 50: 571–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Helmer E.H., Brown S. and Cohen W.B. 2000. Mapping montane tropical forest successional stage and land use with multi-date Landsat imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21: 2163–2183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. INEGI 1993. Mazatlan, Sinaloa Estate. Municipality statistical book (in Spanish). INEGI, Mexico, 123 p.Google Scholar
  15. INEGI 1999. Statistical yearbook of the Estate of Sinaloa (in Span-ish). INEGI, Mexico, 187 p.Google Scholar
  16. Jackson J.B.C., Kirby M.X., Berger W.H., Bjorndal K.A., Botsford L.W., Bourque B.J. et al. 2001. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293: 629–638.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ji C.Y., Liu Q., Sun D., Wang S., Lin P. and Li X. 2001. Monitor-ing urban expansion with remote sensing in China. Interna-tional Journal of Remote Sensing 22: 1441–1455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnston C.A. 1994. Cumulative impacts to wetlands. Wetlands 14: 49–55.Google Scholar
  19. Landgrebe D. and Biehl L. 1995. An introduction to MultiSpec. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA, 85 p.Google Scholar
  20. Landis J. and Koch G. 1977. The measurement of observed agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Luque S.S. 2000. Evaluating temporal changes using Multi-Spectral Scanner and Thematic Mapper data on the landscape of a natural reserve: the New Jersey Pine Barrens, a case study. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21: 2589–2611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ma Z. and Redmon R.L. 1995. Tau coefficients for accuracy assessment of classification of remote sensing data. Photogram-metric Engineering and Remote Sensing 61: 435–439.Google Scholar
  23. Mas J.F. 1997. Monitoring land-cover changes in the Terminos Lagoon region, Mexico: A comparison of changes detection techniques. In: Proceeding of IV International Conference on Remote Sensing for Marine and Coastal Environments, Orlando, Florida, 17–19 March 1997. Vol. 1. Environmental Research Institute of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, pp. 159–167.Google Scholar
  24. McCold L.N. and Saulsbury J.W. 1996. Including past and present impacts in cumulative impact assessments. Environmental Management 20: 767–776.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCreary S., Twiss R., Warren B., White C., Huse S., Gardels K. et al. 1992. Land use change and impacts on the San Francisco estuary: A regional assessment with national policy implications. Coastal Management 20: 219–253.Google Scholar
  26. Mendez N. 2002. Annelid assemblages in soft bottoms subjected to human impact in the Urias Estuary (Sinaloa, Mexico). Oceanologica Acta 25: 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ochoa-Izaguirre M.J., Carballo J.L. and Páez-Osuna F. 2002. Qualitative chmnges in macroalgal assemblages under two contrasting climatic conditions in a subtropical estuary. Botanica Marina 45: 130–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. O'Regan P.T. 1996. The use of contemporary information technol-ogies for coastal research and management–A review. Journal of Coastal Research 12: 192–204.Google Scholar
  29. Ramírez Z.J.R. 1998. Modeling environmental change trends in the estuary Urias, Mazatlan, Sin., through a multitemporal study with Landsat images (in Spanish). MSc Thesis, CIAD-Mazat-lan Unit., Mexico, 85 p.Google Scholar
  30. Ringrose S., Vanderpost C. and Matheson W. 1997. Use of image processing and GIS techniques to determine the extent and pos-sible causes of land management/fenceline induced degradation probles in the Okavango area, northern Botswana. International Journal of Remote Sensing 18: 2337–2364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ruelas-Inzunza J.R. and Páez-Osuna F. 2000. Comparative bioavailability of trace metals using three filter-feeder organisms in a subtropical coastal environment (Southeast Gulf of California). Environmental Pollution 107: 437–444.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ruiz L.A. and Berlanga R.C.A. 1998. Coastal landscape change detection of Mazatlan, Sinaloa, associated with urban growth (in Spanish). In: Proceedings of the V Interamerican Conference on Environment. La Habana, Cuba, Digital version 5–04–0.doc.Google Scholar
  33. Ruiz-Luna A. and Berlanga-Robles C.A. 1999. Modifications in coverage patters and land use around the Huizache-Caimanero Lagoon System, sinaloa, México: A multi-temporal analysis us-ing Landsat images. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 49: 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Soto-Jimenez M.F. and Paez-Osuna F. 2001. Dsitribution and normalization of heavy metal concentration in mangrove and lagoonal sediments from Mazatlan harbor (SE Gulf of Califor-nia). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 53: 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. van Mansvelt J.D. and van der Lubbe M.J. 1999. Checklist for Sustainable Landscape Management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 181 p.Google Scholar
  36. Vega A.E. 1998. Un norte (in Spanish). In: Carrillo R.A. and Ibarra E.G. (eds), History of Mazatlan. Municipality of Mazatlan/Au-tonomous University of Sinaloa, Mexico, pp. 21–53.Google Scholar
  37. Zalidis G.C., Mantzavelas A.L. and Gourvelou E. 1997. Environmental impacts on Greek wetlands. Wetlands 17: 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arturo Ruiz-Luna
    • 1
  • César A. Berlanga-Robles
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Centre for Food and Development (CIAD), A.C. Unidad MazatlánMéxico

Personalised recommendations