Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 67, Issue 1, pp 35–46 | Cite as

First Field Studies of an Endangered South African seahorse, Hippocampus capensis

  • Elanor M. Bell
  • Jacqueline F. Lockyear
  • Jana M. McPherson
  • A. Dale Marsden
  • Amanda C.J. Vincent
Article

Abstract

South Africa's endemic Knysna seahorse, Hippocampus capensis Boulenger 1900, is a rare example of a marine fish listed as Endangered by the IUCN because of its limited range and habitat vulnerability. It is restricted to four estuaries on the southern coast of South Africa. This study reports on its biology in the Knysna and Swartvlei estuaries, both of which are experiencing heavy coastal development. We found that H. capensis was distributed heterogeneously throughout the Knysna Estuary, with a mean density of 0.0089 m−2 and an estimated total population of 89 000 seahorses (95% confidence interval: 30 000–148 000). H. capensis was found most frequently in low density vegetation stands (≤20% cover) and grasping Zostera capensis. Seahorse density was not otherwise correlated with habitat type or depth. The size of the area in which any particular seahorse was resighted did not differ between males and females. Adult sex ratios were skewed in most transects, with more males than females, but were even on a 10 by 10 m focal study grid. Only three juveniles were sighted during the study. Both sexes were reproductively active but no greeting or courtship behaviours were observed. Males on the focal study grid were longer than females, and had shorter heads and longer tails, but were similar in colouration and skin filamentation. The level of threat to H. capensis and our limited knowledge of its biology mean that further scientific study is urgently needed to assist in developing sound management practices.

Knysna Estuary abundance distribution population structure behaviour 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Ansari, Z.A., C.U. Rivonker, P. Ramani & A.H. Parulekar. 1991. Seagrass habitat complexity and macroinvertebrate abundance in Lakshadweep coral reef lagoons, Arabian Sea. Coral Reefs 10: 127-131.Google Scholar
  2. Bayer, R.D. 1980. Size, seasonality, and sex ratios of the Bay Pipefish (Syngnathus leptorhynchus) in Oregon. Northwest Sci. 54: 161-166.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, J.D. & M. Westoby. 1986. Abundance of macrofauna in dense seagrass is due to habitat preference, not predation. Oecologia 68: 205-209.Google Scholar
  4. Berglund, A.G., G. Rosenqvist & I. Svensson. 1986. Reversed sex roles and parental energy investment in zygotes of two pipefish (Syngnathidae) species. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 29: 209-215.Google Scholar
  5. Buxton, C.D. & M.J. Smale. 1989. Abundance and distribution patterns of three temperate marine reef fish (Teleostei: Sparidae) in exploited and unexploited areas off the Southern Cape coast. J. Appl. Ecol. 26: 441-451.Google Scholar
  6. Chmelik, F.B. 1975. Economic model for estuarine evaluation. Pretoria Department of Planning and the Environment Bulletin 2. 105 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Cowley, P.D. & A.K. Whitfield. 2001. Ichthyofaunal characteristics of a typical temporarily open/closed estuary on the southeast coast of South Africa. Ichthyol. Bull. J.L.B. Smith Inst. Ichthyol. 71: 1-19.Google Scholar
  8. Dauwe, B. 1992. Ecologie van het zeepaardje Hippocampus reidi (Syngnathidae) op het koraalrif van Bonaire (N.A.): Habitatgebruik, reproductie en interspecifieke interacties. (Ecology of the seahorse Hippocampus reidi on the coral reefs of Bonaire (N.A.): habitat use, reproduction and interspecific interactions.). M.Sc. Thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, the Netherlands. 65 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Day, D.H. (ed.) 1981. Estuarine ecology with particular reference to South African estuaries. Balkema, Cape Town. 411 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Day, L. 1997. Drifting into danger: Seahorses. Africa-Environment and Wildlife 5: 66-71.Google Scholar
  11. Day, J.H., N.A.H. Millard & A.D. Harrison. 1952. The ecology of South African estuaries. Part III Knysna: A clear open estuary. T. Roy. Soc. S. Afr. 33: 367-413.Google Scholar
  12. Efron, B. & R. LePage. 1992. Introduction to bootstrap. pp. 3-10. In: R. LePage and L. Billard (ed.) Exploring the Limits of Bootstrap, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Efron, B. & R.J. Tibshirani. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York. 436 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Fourie, D. 1997. Sex-roles and the influence of size on mating competition in the Knysna seahorse, Hippocampus capensis. Honours Thesis, University of Stellenbosch. 15 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Grange, N. & R. Cretchley. 1995. A preliminary investigation of the reproductive behaviour of the Knysna seahorses, Hippocampus capensis Boulenger 1900. S. Afr. J. Aquat. Sci. 21: 103-104.Google Scholar
  16. Grindley, J.R. & G.A. Eagle. 1978. Environmental effects of the discharge of sewage effluent into Knysna Estuary. University of Cape Town, School of Environmental Studies. 62 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Grindley, J.R. & C.S. Snow. 1983. Environmental effects of the discharge of sewage effluent into Knysna Lagoon. University of Cape Town, School of Environmental Studies. 55 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Groombridge, B. (ed.) 1993. 1994 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. IUCN, Gland. 286 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Harris, S., W.J. Cresswell, P.G. Forde, W.J. Trewhella, T. Woollard & S. Wray. 1990. Home-range analysis using radio-tracking data-a review of the problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals. Mammal Rev. 20: 97-123.Google Scholar
  20. Hilton-Taylor, C. (compiler) 2000. 2000 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. IUCN/SSC, Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge, U.K. http://www.redlist.org.Google Scholar
  21. IUCN. 1995. Guidelines for re-introductions. Gland, Switzerland. http://www.iucn.org.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, A.G., C. Kvarnemo, G.I. Moore, L.W. Simmons & J.C. Avise. 1998. Microsatellite evidence for monogamy and sex-biased recombination in the Western Australian seahorse Hippocampus angustus. Mol. Ecol. 7: 1497-1505.Google Scholar
  23. Kok, H.M. 1981. Knysna seahorse distribution poses a problem. African Wildlife 35: 9.Google Scholar
  24. Kramer, D.L., R.W. Rangeley & L.J. Chapman. 1997. Habitat selection: Patterns of spatial distribution from behavioural decisions. pp. 37-80. In: J.-G.J. Godin (ed.) Behavioural Ecology of Teleost Fishes. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kvarnemo, C., G.I. Moore, A.G. Jones, W.S. Nelson & J.C.Avise. 2000. Monogamous pair bonds and mate switching in the Western Australian seahorse Hippocampus subelongatus. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 882-888.Google Scholar
  26. Le Cheminant, J. 2000.Aninvestigation to establish the suitability of Opalithplattchen (Bee Tag), Fly andVisible Implant Fluorescent Elastomer (VIFE) tagging systems for marking the Knysna seahorse, Hippocampus capensis. M.Sc. thesis, Bournemouth University. 83 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Lockyear, J.F., H. Kaiser & T. Hecht. 1997. Studies on the captive breeding of the Knysna Seahorse (Hippocampus capensis). Aquar. Sci. Conserv. 1: 129-136.Google Scholar
  28. Lourie, S.A., A.C.J. Vincent & H.J. Hall. 1999. Seahorses: An identification guide to the world's species and their conservation. London, U.K. 214 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Masonjones, H.D. & S.M. Lewis. 1996. Courtship behavior in the dwarf seahorse, Hippocampus zosterae. Copeia 3: 634-640.Google Scholar
  30. Matsumoto, K. & Y. Yanagisawa. 2001. Monogamy and sex role reversal in the pipefish Corythoichthys haematopterus. Anim. Behav. 61: 163-170.Google Scholar
  31. Middleton, M.J., J.D. Bell, J.J. Burchmore, D.A. Pollard & B.C. Pease. 1984. Structural differences in the fish communities of Zostera capricorni and Posidonia australia seagrass meadows in Botany Bay, New South Wales. Aquat. Bot. 18: 89-109.Google Scholar
  32. Naylor, R.L., R.J. Goldburg, J.H. Primavera, N. Kautsky, M.C.M. Beveridge, J. Clay, C. Folke, J. Lubchenco, H. Mooney & M. Troell. 2000. Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405: 1017-1024.Google Scholar
  33. Nijhoff, M. (1993) Voortplantingsecologie van het zeepaardje Hippocampus reidi op het koraalrif van Bonaire. (Reproductive ecology of the seahorse Hippocampus reidi on a Bonaire coral reef.). M.Sc. thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, the Netherlands. 49 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Perante, N.C., M.G. Pajaro & A.C.J. Vincent. 1998. Demographics of the seahorse Hippocampus comes in the Central Philippines. pp. 439-448. In: B. Morton (ed.) The Marine Biology of the South China Sea. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Marine Biology of the South China Sea, Hong Kong, 28 October-1 November, 1996. Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Perante, N.C., M.G. Pajaro & A.C.J. Vincent. 2002. Biology of a seahorse species, Hippocampus comes, in the central Philippines. J. Fish Biol. 60: 821-837.Google Scholar
  36. Plumstead, E.E. 1990. Changes in ichthyofaunal diversity and abundance within the Mbashe Estuary, Transkei, following construction of a river barrage. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 9: 399-407.Google Scholar
  37. Russell, I.A. 1994. Mass mortality of marine and estuarine fish in the Swartvlei andWilderness Lake systems, Southern Cape. S. Afr. J. Aquat. Sci. 20: 93-96.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, M.M. 1981. The Seahorse of the Knysna Lagoon. African Wildlife 35: 6-9.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, M.M., P.C. Heemstra & J.L.B. Smith (ed.) 1986. Smith's Sea Fishes, 6th edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 1047 pp.Google Scholar
  40. Strawn, K. 1958. Life history of the pigmy seahorse, Hippocampus zosterae Jordan and Gilbert, at Cedar Key, Florida. Copeia 1958: 16-22.Google Scholar
  41. Toeffie, Z. 2000. A preliminary examination of the morphology and genetic structure within populations of the Knysna seahorse, Hippocampus capensis (Pisces: Syngnathidae), from two South African estuaries. M.Sc. thesis, University of the Western Cape. 102 pp.Google Scholar
  42. Tops, S. 1999. An investigation into the effects of habitat complexity and food types on the behaviour of the Knysna Seahorse-Hippocampus capensis. Honours Thesis, University of St. Andrews. 53 pp.Google Scholar
  43. Vincent, A.C.J. 1990. Reproductive ecology of seahorses. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge. 109 pp.Google Scholar
  44. Vincent, A.C.J. 1994. Seahorses exhibit conventional sex roles in mating competition, despite male pregnancy. Behaviour 128: 135-151.Google Scholar
  45. Vincent, A.C.J. 1995. A role for daily greetings in maintaining seahorse pair bonds. Anim. Behav. 49: 258-260.Google Scholar
  46. Vincent, A.C.J. 1996. The International Trade in Seahorses. TRAFFIC International, Cambridge, UK. 163 pp.Google Scholar
  47. Vincent, A.C.J. & L.M. Sadler. 1995. Faithful pair bonds in wild seahorses, Hippocampus whitei. Anim. Behav. 50: 1557-1569.Google Scholar
  48. Whitfield, A.K. 1989a. Ichthyoplankton interchange in the mouth region of a southern African estuary. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 54: 25-33.Google Scholar
  49. Whitfield, A.K. 1989b. Fish larval composition, abundance and seasonality in a southern African estuarine lake. S. Afr. J. Zool. 24: 217-224.Google Scholar
  50. Whitfield, A.K. 1995a. Threatened fishes of the world: Hippocampus capensis Boulenger 1900 (Syngnathidae). Environ. Biol. Fish. 44: 362.Google Scholar
  51. Whitfield, A.K. 1995b. Threatened fishes of the world: Syngnathus watermeyeri Smith, 1963 (Syngnathidae) Environ. Biol. Fish. 43(2): 152.Google Scholar
  52. Whitfield, A.K., L.E. Beckley, B.A. Bennett, G.M. Branch, H.M. Kok, I.C. Potter & R.P. Van der Elst. 1989. Composition, species richness and similarity of ichthyofaunas in eelgrass, Zostera capensis, beds of Southern Africa. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 8: 251-259.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elanor M. Bell
    • 1
  • Jacqueline F. Lockyear
    • 2
  • Jana M. McPherson
    • 1
  • A. Dale Marsden
    • 3
  • Amanda C.J. Vincent
    • 3
  1. 1.Project Seahorse, Department of BiologyMcGill UniversityMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Modelling, Institute of Biochemistry and BiologyPotsdam UniversityPotsdamGermany
  3. 3.Department of Biology, McGill UniversityUniversity of British Columbia, 2204 Main Mall, Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6T 1Z4Canada H3A 1B1; Current address: Project Seahorse, Fisheries Centre, The

Personalised recommendations