Landscape Ecology

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 141–158 | Cite as

Accessibility as a determinant of landscape transformation in western Honduras: linking pattern and process

  • Harini Nagendra
  • Jane Southworth
  • Catherine Tucker

Abstract

This study evaluates the relationship between landscape accessibility and land cover change in Western Honduras, and demonstrates how these relationships are influenced by social and economic processes of land use change in the region. The study area presents a complex mosaic of land cover change processes that involve approximately equal amounts of reforestation and deforestation. Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) satellite imagery of 1987, 1991 and 1996 was used to create three single date classifications and a land cover change image depicting the sequence of changes in land cover between 1987–1991–1996. An accessibility analysis examined land cover change and landscape fragmentation relative to elevation and distance from roads. Between 1987 and 1991, results follow ‘expected’ trends, with more accessible areas experiencing greater deforestation and fragmentation. Between 1991 and 1996 this trend reverses. Increased deforestation is found in areas distant from roads, and at higher elevations; a result of government policies promoting expansion of mountain coffee production for export. A ban on logging, and abandonment of marginally productive agricultural fields due to agricultural intensification in other parts of the landscape, has led to increased regrowth in accessible regions of the landscape. Roads and elevation also present different obstacles in terms of their accessibility, with the smallest patches of cyclical clearing and regrowth, relating mostly to the agricultural fallow cycle, found at the highest elevations but located close to roads. This research highlights the need to locate analyses of land cover change within the context of local socio-economic policies and land use processes.

Elevation Honduras Land cover trajectories Land use change Landscape metrics Roads 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Foody G.M. 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of the Environment 80: 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Forman R.T.T. 1995. Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  3. Geist H.J. and Lambin E.F. 2002. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience 52: 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Green G.M. and Sussman R.W. 1990. Deforestation history of the eastern rain forests of Madagascar from satellite images. Science 248: 212–215.Google Scholar
  5. Griffiths G.S. and Mather P.M. 2000. Remote sensing and landscape ecology: Landscape patterns and landscape change. In-ternational Journal of Remote Sensing 21: 2537–2539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haines-Young R. and Chopping M. 1996. Quantifying landscape structure: a review of landscape indices and their application to forested landscapes. Progress in Physical Geography 20: 418–445.Google Scholar
  7. Hall F.G., Strebel D.E. and Nickeson J.E. 1991. Radiometric rec-tification: Toward a common radiometric response among multidate, multisensor images. Remote Sensing of Environment 35: 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Helmer E.H. 2000. The landscape ecology of tropical secondary forest in Montane Costa Rica. Ecosystems 3: 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Instituto Hondureño del Café 1997. Boletín Estadístico 1970–1996. Instituto Hondureño del Café, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.Google Scholar
  10. Jensen J.R. 1996. Introductory Digital Image Processing. Prentice-Hall, Inc, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA, pp. 318.Google Scholar
  11. Jensen J.R. 2000. Remote Sensing of the Environment: An earth resource perspective. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Kaimowitz D. 1997. Factors determining low deforestation: The Bolivian Amazon. Ambio 26: 537–540.Google Scholar
  13. Lambin E.F., Turner B.L., Geist H.J., Agbola S.B., Angelsen A., Bruce J.W. et al. 2001. The causes of land use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change 11: 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Laurance W.F., Cochrane M.A., Bergen S., Fearnside P.M., Dela-monica P., Barber C. et al. 2001. The future of the Brazilian Amazon. Science 291: 438–441.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laurance W.F. and Williamson G.B. 2001. Positive feedbacks among forest fragmentation, drought, and climate change in the Amazon. Conservation Biology 15: 1529–1535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ludeke A.K., Maggio R.C. and Reid L.M. 1990. An analysis of anthropogenic deforestation using logistic regression and GIS. Journal of Environmental Management 31: 247–259.Google Scholar
  17. Maki S., Kalliola R. and Vuorinen K. 2001. Road construction in the Peruvian Amazon: process, causes and consequences. En-vironmental Conservation 28: 199–214.Google Scholar
  18. McGarigal K. and Marks B.J. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-351. Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Mertens B. and Lambin E.F. 1997. Spatial Modelling of Deforestation in Southern Cameroon. Applied Geography 17: 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mertens B. and Lambin E.F. 2000. Land-Cover-Change trajectories in Southern Cameroon. Annals of the Association of Amer-ican Geographers 90: 467–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moran E.F., Brondizio E., Mausel P. and Wu Y. 1994. Integrating Amazonian vegetation, land-use, and satellite data. BioScience 44: 329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Munroe D., Southworth J. and Tucker C. 2001. The dynamics of land-cover change in western Honduras: Spatial autocorrelation and temporal variation. In: Conference Proceedings. American Agricultural Economics Association. AAEA-CAES Annual Meeting. Chicago, Illinois, USA. August 2001.Google Scholar
  23. Munroe D., Southworth J. and Tucker C. 2002. The Dynamics of Land-Cover Change in Western Honduras: Exploring Spatial and Temporal Complexity. Agricultural Economics 27: 355–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nelson G.C. and Hellerstein D. 1997. Do roads cause deforestation? Using satellite images of econometric analysis of land use. American Journal Agricultural Economics 79: 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nepstad D., Carvalho G., Barros A.C., Alencar A., Capobianco J.P., Bishop J. et al. 2001. Road paving, fire regime feedbacks, and the future of Amazon forests. Forest Ecology and Management 154: 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ochoa-Gaona S. and Gonzalez-Espinosa M. 2000. Land use and deforestation in the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Applied Geography 20: 17–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pearson D.M. 2002. The application of local measures of spatial autocorrelation for describing pattern in north Australian land-scapes. Journal of Environmental Management 64: 85–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Petit C., Scudder T. and Lambin E. 2001. Quantifying processes of land-cover change by remote sensing: resettlement and rapid land-cover changes in south-eastern Zambia. International Journal of Remote Sensing 22: 3435–3456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pineda Portillo and Noé 1984. Geografía de Honduras. 2nd edn. Editorial ESP, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.Google Scholar
  30. Riitters K., Wickham J., O'Neill R., Jones B. and Smith E. 2000. Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Conservation Ecology 4: 3, [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/art3.Google Scholar
  31. Sader S.A. and Joyce A.T. 1988. Deforestation rates and trends in Costa-Rica, 1940 to 1983. Biotropica 21: 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sader S.A. 1995. Spatial characteristics of forest clearing and vegetation regrowth as detected by Landsat Thematic Mapper imagery. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 61: 1145–1151.Google Scholar
  33. Soares-Filho D.S., Assuncao R.M. and Pantuzzo A.E. 2001. Modeling the spatial transition probabilities of landscape dynamics in an Amazonian colonization frontier. BioScience 51: 1059–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sokal R.R. and Rohlf F.J. 1987. Introduction to Biostatistics. 2nd edn. W. H. Freeman Company, San Francisco, California, USA.Google Scholar
  35. Southworth J. and Tucker C.M. 2001. Forest cover change in west-ern Honduras: the role of socio-economic and biophysical factors, local institutions, and land tenure. Mountain Research and Development 21 3: 276–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Southworth J., Nagendra J.H. and Tucker C.M. 2002. Fragmentation of a landscape: Incorporating landscape metrics into satellite analyses of land cover change. Landscape Research 27: 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stone T.A., Brown I.F. and Woodwell G.M. 1991. Estimation, by remote sensing, of deforestation in central Rhondonia, Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management 38: 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thomlinson J.R., Bolstad P.V. and Cohen W.B. 1999. Coordinating methodologies for scaling landcover classifications from site-specific to global: steps towards validating global map products. Remote Sensing of the Environment 70: 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tucker C.M. 1996. The Political Ecology of a Lenca Indian Community in Honduras: Communal Forests, State Policy, and Processes of Transformation. PhD Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.Google Scholar
  40. Tucker C.M. 1999a. Private vs. Communal Forests: Forest Condi-tions and Tenure in a Honduran Community. Human Ecology 27: 201–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tucker C.M. 1999b. Manejo Forestal y Políticas Nacionales en La Campa, Honduras. Mesoamérica 37: 111–144.Google Scholar
  42. U.S. National Research Council 1999. Global Environmental Change: Research Pathways for the Next Decade. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  43. Williams L.O. 1981. The Useful Plants of Central America. Ceiba 24: 3–342.Google Scholar
  44. Woods C.H. and Skole D. 1998. Linking satellite, census, and survey data to study deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. In: Liverman D., Moran E.F., Rindfuss R.R. and Stern P.C. (eds), People and Pixels: Linking remote sensing and social science. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 70–93.Google Scholar
  45. Zúniga Andrade E. 1990. Las modalidades de la lluvia en Hondu-ras. Editorial. Guaymuras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras. 158Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harini Nagendra
    • 1
  • Jane Southworth
    • 2
  • Catherine Tucker
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental ChangeIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geography & Land Use and Environmental Change Institute (LUECI)University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations