New Forests

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 83–99

Evaluation of native tree species for the rehabilitation of deforested areas in a Mexican cloud forest

Article

Abstract

Four native tree species (Liquidambar styraciflua, Juglans pyriformis, Podocarpus matudae, and Carpinus caroliniana) were evaluated for their suitability in rehabilitating degraded areas of Mexican cloud forest. Plant survival and growth in height and diameter were determined in three mixed-experimental plantations with different land use histories; their performance was compared with two on-farm plantations started by landowners for forest restoration. Nearby forest fragments were controls for soil compaction. An experimental plantation with remnant trees had the highest plant survival (82%), height, basal diameter and relative growth rate. The plantation with the steepest slope had high plant survival (63%) and growth. The plantation characterized by dominance of grasses and compacted soils had the lowest survival (22%) and growth. On-farm plantations had good establishment of planted trees (5–10 species planted), and facilitated the recruitment of 9–11 woody species. Carpinus and Liquidambar appear to be suitable species for reforestation in all these areas. Podocarpus grew relatively slowly, although it performed well in two experimental sites. Juglans had high survival (76%) under the stressful conditions of the most adverse site, and therefore may be useful for rehabilitation of degraded sites. Differences among species and sites strongly suggest that species success depends on plantation site quality.

Carpinus caroliniana Juglans pyriformis Liquidambar styraciflua Mexico Mixed plantations Podocarpus matudae Rehabilitation Tropical montane cloud forest 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aide T.M. and Cavelier J. 1994. Barriers to lowland tropical forest restoration in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia. Rest. Ecol. 2: 219–229.Google Scholar
  2. Barrett W.H. 1980. Selection and management of seed stands with special reference to conifers. FAO Forestry Paper No 20. In: FAO/DANIDA, Forest tree improvement. International Book Distributors, Dehradun, India, pp. 116–121.Google Scholar
  3. Bradshaw A.D. 1983. The reconstruction of ecosystems. J. App. Ecol. 20: 1–17.Google Scholar
  4. Brown S. and Lugo A.E. 1994. Rehabilitation of tropical lands: a key to sustaining development. Rest. Ecol. 2: 97–111.Google Scholar
  5. Butterfield R.P. 1993. Forestry in Costa Rica: Status, research priorities and the role of La Selva Biological Station. In: McDade L.A., Bawa K.S., Hespenheide H.A. and Hartshorn G.S. (eds), La Selva. Ecology and natural history of a neotropical rain forest. University Press, Chicago, pp. 327–328.Google Scholar
  6. Butterfield R.P. and Espinoza M.C. 1995. Screening trial of 14 tropical hardwoods with an emphasis on species native to Costa Rica: fourth year results. New Forests 9: 135–145.Google Scholar
  7. Camacho-Cruz A., González-Espinosa M., Wolf J.H.D. and De Jong B.H.J. 2000. Germination and survival of tree species in disturbed forests of the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico. Can. J. Bot. 78: 1309–1318.Google Scholar
  8. Carmona V.T. 1979. Características histológicas de la madera de cuatro especies del bosque caducifolio de México, Undergraduate thesis, Facultad de Ciencias UNAM, Mexico, D.F.Google Scholar
  9. Cavelier J. 1995. Reforestation with the native tree Alnus acuminata: effects of phytodiversity and species richness in an upper montane rain forest area of Colombia. In: Hamilton L.S., Juvik J.O. and Scatena F.N. (eds), Tropical Montane Cloud Forest. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 125–137.Google Scholar
  10. Cavelier J. and Santos C. 1999. Effects of abandoned exotic and native species plantations on the natural regeneration of a montane forest in Colombia. Rev. Biol. Trop. 47: 775–784.Google Scholar
  11. Challenger A. 1998. Utilización y conservación de los ecosistemas terrestres de Mexico. CONABIO, UNAM and Sierra Madre, A.C. México, D.F.Google Scholar
  12. Chaverri A., ZÚñiga E. and Fuentes A. 1997. Crecimiento inicial de una plantacion mixta de Quercus, Cornus, Alnus y Cupressus en Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Trop. 45: 777–784.Google Scholar
  13. Cuevas E. and Lugo A.E. 1998. Dynamics of organic matter and nutrient return from litterfall in stands of ten tropical tree plantation species. For. Ecol. Manag. 112: 263–279.Google Scholar
  14. Falcon S.C. 2000. Evaluación de la variación de un ensayo de procedencias de Liquidambar styraciflua L. Xalapa, Veracruz, México. Master's thesis, Instituto de Genética Forestal. Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, Veracruz 48 p.Google Scholar
  15. Guariguata M.R., Rheingans R. and Montagnini F. 1995. Early woody invasion under tree plantations in Costa Rica: implications for forest restoration. Rest. Ecol. 3: 252–260.Google Scholar
  16. Haggar J., Wightman K. and Fisher R. 1997. The potential of plantations to foster woody regeneration within a deforested landscape in lowland Costa Rica. For. Ecol. Manag. 99: 55–64.Google Scholar
  17. Haggar J., Briscoe C.B. and Butterfield R.P. 1998. Native species: a resource for the diversification of forestry production in the lowland humid tropics. For. Ecol. Manag. 106: 195–203.Google Scholar
  18. Holl K.D. and Quiros-Nietzen E. 1999. The effect of rabbit herbivory on reforestation of abandoned pasture in southern Costa Rica. Biol. Cons. 87: 391–395.Google Scholar
  19. Holl K.D., Loik M.E., Lin E.H.V. and Samuels I.A. 2000. Tropical montane forest restoration in Costa Rica: obstacles and opportunities. Rest. Ecol. 8: 339–349.Google Scholar
  20. Hunt R. 1978. Plant growth analysis. Studies in Biology no. 96. Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd, London.Google Scholar
  21. Lamb D. 1998. Large-scale ecological restoration of degraded tropical forest lands: the potential role of timber plantations. Rest. Ecol. 6: 271–279.Google Scholar
  22. McCarter P.S. and Hughes C.E. 1984. Liquidambar styraciflua L. A species of potential for the tropics. Comm. For. Rev. 63: 207–216.Google Scholar
  23. McMillan C. and Winstead J.E. 1976. Adaptative diferentiation in Liquidambar styraciflua L. from eastern United States and northeastern Mexico under uniform environmental conditions. Bot. Gaz. 137: 361–367.Google Scholar
  24. Masera O.R., Ordonez M.J. and Dirzo R. 1997. Carbon emissions from Mexican forests: current situation and long term scenarios. Climatic Change 35: 265–295.Google Scholar
  25. Murcia C. 1997. Evaluation of Andean alder as a catalyst for the recovery of tropical cloud forest in Colombia. For. Ecol. Manag. 99: 163–170.Google Scholar
  26. Nepstad D.C., Uhl C., Pereira C.A. and da Silva J.M.C. 1996. A comparative study of tree establishment in abandoned pasture and mature forest of eastern Amazonia. Oikos 76: 25–39.Google Scholar
  27. Otsamo R. 2000a. Early development of three planted indigenous tree species and natural understorey vegetation in artificial gaps in an Acacia mangium stand on an Imperata cylindrica grassland site in South Kalimantan, Indonesia. New Forests 19: 51–68.Google Scholar
  28. Otsamo R. 2000b. Secondary forest regeneration under fast-growing forest plantations on degraded Imperata cylindrica grasslands. New Forests 19: 69–93.Google Scholar
  29. Parrotta J.A. 1992. The role of plantations forests in rehabilitating degraded tropical ecosystems. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 41: 115–133.Google Scholar
  30. Parrotta J.A. 1995. Influence of overstory composition on understory colonization by native species in plantations on a degraded tropical site. J. Veg. Sc. 6: 627–636.Google Scholar
  31. Parrotta J.A., Turnbull J.W. and Jones N. 1997. Catalyzing native forest regeneration on degraded tropical lands. For. Ecol. Manag. 99: 1–7.Google Scholar
  32. Parkash R. 1999. Forest Management. International Book Distribution, Dehra Dun, India.Google Scholar
  33. Pedraza R.A. 1998. Germinación de semillas de especies arboreas colectadas en áreas boscosas de la región de Xalapa, Veracruz. Foresta Veracruzana 1: 13–18.Google Scholar
  34. Pyke D.A. and Thompson J.N. 1986. Statistical analysis of survival and removal rate experiments. Ecology 67: 240–245.Google Scholar
  35. Ramírez-Marcial N. 2002. Disturbio humano y la diversidad de árboles y arbustos del bosque mesófilo en las montañas del norte de Chiapas. Doctoral Thesis, Instituto de Ecologia, A: C, Xalapa,Veracruz 158 p.Google Scholar
  36. Reiners W.A., Bouwman A.F., Parsons W.F.J. and Keller M. 1994. Tropical rain forest conversion to pasture: changes in vegetation and soil properties. Ecol. App. 4: 363–377.Google Scholar
  37. Rzedowski J. 1993. Diversity and origins of the phanerogamic flora of Mexico. In: Rammamoorthy T.P., Bye R., Lot A. and Fa J. (eds), Biological Diversity of Mexico: Origins and Distribution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 129–144.Google Scholar
  38. Rzedowski J. 1996. Análisis preliminar de la flora vascular de los bosques mesofilos de montana de México. Acta Bot. Mex. 35: 25–44.Google Scholar
  39. SAS Institute, Cary, NC 1997. JMP User's Guide.Google Scholar
  40. SEMARNAP. 1999. Anuario estadístico de la producción forestal 1998. Gobierno de la Republica. Talleres Gráficos, Mexico, D.F.Google Scholar
  41. SEMARNAP. 2000. Informe de labores 1999–2000. Gobierno de la República. Talleres Gráficos, México, D.F.Google Scholar
  42. Sosa V. and Gómez-Pompa A. 1994. Flora de Veracruz. Lista floristica. Fascículo 82. University of California, Instituto de Ecología A.C., Riverside, Xalapa, Veracruz, CA.Google Scholar
  43. Standley W.G. and Montagnini F. 1999. Biomass and nutrient accumulation in pure and mixed plantations of indigenous tree species grown on poor soils in the humid tropics of Costa Rica. For. Ecol. Manag. 113: 91–103.Google Scholar
  44. Vázquez-Yanes C., Batis Muñoz A.I., Alcocer Silva M.I., Gual Díaz M. and Sánchez Dirzo C. 1999. Árboles y arbustos potencialmente valiosos para la restauración ecológica y la reforestación. Reporte técnico del proyecto J084. CONABIO-Instituto de Ecología, UNAM, Mexico D.F.Google Scholar
  45. Williams-Linera G. 1996. Crecimiento diamétrico de árboles caducifolios y perennifolios del bosque mesófilo de montaña en los alrededores de Xalapa. Madera y Bosques 2: 53–65.Google Scholar
  46. Williams-Linera G. 2002. Tree species richness complementarity, disturbance and fragmentation in a Mexican tropical montane cloud forest. Biod. & Cons. 11: 1825–1843.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Ecología, A. C.XalapaMéxico

Personalised recommendations