Journal of Happiness Studies

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 185–199 | Cite as

Happiness in Everyday Life: The Uses of Experience Sampling

  • Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
  • Jeremy Hunter
Article

Abstract

This paper uses the Experience Sampling Method data drawn from a national sample of American youth. It examines the proximal environmental factors as well as behaviors and habits that correlate to personal happiness. Momentary-level scores show that reported happiness varies significantly both by day of week and time of day. Furthermore, particular activities are associated with varying degrees of happiness. School activities rate below average scores in happiness, while social, active and passive leisure activities are above average. Particular companions also correlate to differing level of happiness. Being alone rates the lowest levels of happiness, while being with friend corresponds to the highest. Person-level averages of happiness suggest that both higher social class and age correlate with lower levels of happiness, while gender and race do not. Paradoxically, youth who spend more time in school and social activities are happier than those who spend less. Unexpectedly, students who spend more time pleasure reading report lower levels of happiness. Finally, feeling good about the self, excited, proud, sociable, active as well as being in the conditions for flow experience are the strongest predictors of trait happiness.

experience sampling happiness usual daily activities 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Brickman, P., D. Coates and R.J. Janoff-Bulman: 1978, ‘Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative?’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (36), pp. 917–927.Google Scholar
  2. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: 1990, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
  3. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: 1997, Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life (Basic Books, New York).Google Scholar
  4. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: 2003, Good Business: Leadership, Flow, and the Making of Meaning (Viking, New York).Google Scholar
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, M and B. Schneider: 2001, ‘Conditions for optimal development in adolescence: An experiential approach’, Applied Developmental Science 5(3), pp. 122–124.Google Scholar
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M., R. Larson and S. Prescott: 1977, ‘The ecology of adolescent activities and experiences’, Journal of Youth and Adolescence 6(3), pp. 281–294.Google Scholar
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M., K. Rathunde and S. Whalen: 1993, Talented Teenagers: The Roots of Success and Failure (Cambridge University Press, New York).Google Scholar
  8. Diener, E.: 2000, ‘Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index’, American Psychologist, 55(1), pp. 34–43.Google Scholar
  9. Graef, R.: 1978, ‘An analysis of the person by situation interaction through repeated measures’, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Hektner, J.: ESM Handbook. (in preparation).Google Scholar
  11. Inglehart, R. and H.D. Klingemann: 2000, ‘Genes, culture, democracy and happiness’, in E. Diener and E.M. Suh (eds), Culture and Subjective Well-being (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 165–183.Google Scholar
  12. Kahneman, D.: 1999, ‘Objective happiness’, in D. Kahneman, E. Diener and N. Schwartz (eds), Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (Russel Sage, New York), pp. 3–25.Google Scholar
  13. Kubey, R. Larson and M. Csikszentmihalyi: 1996, ‘Experience sampling method applications to communication research questions’, Journal of Communication 46(2), pp. 99–120.Google Scholar
  14. Lykken, D. and A. Tellegen: 1996, ‘Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon’, Psychological Science 7, pp. 186–189.Google Scholar
  15. Moneta, G., B. Schneider and M. Csikszentmihalyi: 2001, ‘A longitudinal study of the self-concept and experiential components of self-worth and affect across adolescence’, Applied Developmental Science 5(3), pp. 125–152.Google Scholar
  16. Patton, J.D.: 2002, ‘The role of problem pioneers in creative innovation’, Creativity Research Journal, 14(1), pp. 111–126.Google Scholar
  17. Ryan, R. and C. Frederick: 1997, ‘On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being’, Journal of Personality, 65(3), pp. 529–565.Google Scholar
  18. Schwartz, N. and F. Strack: 1999, ‘Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications’, in D. Kahneman, E. Diener and N. Schwartz (eds), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (Russel Sage, New York), pp. 61–84.Google Scholar
  19. Schmuck, P. and K.M. Sheldon: 2001, Life-goals andWell-being (Hogrefe & Huber, Göttingen).Google Scholar
  20. Seligman, E.P.: 2002, Authentic Happiness (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  21. Tellegen, A., D.T. Lykken, T.J. Bouchard, K.J. Wilcox, N.L. Segal and S. Rich: 1988, ‘Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, pp. 1031–1039.Google Scholar
  22. Veenhoven, R.: 1995, ‘The cross-national pattern of happiness: Test of predictions implied in three theories of happiness’, Social Indicators Research 34, pp. 33–68.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
    • 1
  • Jeremy Hunter
  1. 1.The Quality of Life Research, CenterClaremont Graduate UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations