Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 1403–1415 | Cite as

A Role for Isothiocyanates in Plant Resistance Against the Specialist Herbivore Pieris rapae

  • Anurag A. AgrawalEmail author
  • Nile S. Kurashige
Article

Abstract

We experimentally reanalyzed the classic interaction between Pieris rapae, a specialist lepidopteran herbivore, and isothiocyanates (mustard oils) that are characteristic phytochemicals of the Brassicaceae. Previous investigations have suggested that P. rapae is unaffected by isothiocyanates. Using whole plants, root extracts, and a microencapsulated formulation of allyl isothiocyanate, we now show that isothiocyanates reduce herbivore survival and growth, and increase development time, each in a dose-dependent manner. Neither the substrate allyl glucosinolate, nor myrosinase, the enzyme that results in the breakdown of glucosinolates, negatively affected P. rapae. Thus, we present strong evidence for a role for isothiocyanates in plant resistance against the specialist herbivore P. rapae.

Arabidopsis lyrata Brassica spp Brassicaceae glucosinolates herbivory horseradish host range evolution induced plant resistance microencapsulation myrosinase plant–insect interactions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, L. S., Schmitt, J., and Bowers, M. D. 1995. Genetic variation in defensive chemistry in Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae) and its effect on the specialist herbivore Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae). Oecologia 101:75–85.Google Scholar
  2. Agelopoulos, N. G., Dicke, M., and Posthumus, M. A. 1995. Role of volatile infochemicals emitted by feces of larvae in host-searching behavior of parasitoid Cotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): A behavioral and chemical study. J. Chem. Ecol. 21:1789–1811.Google Scholar
  3. Agrawal, A. A. 1998. Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance. Science 279:1201–1202.Google Scholar
  4. Agrawal, A. A. 2000a. Host range evolution: Adaptation of mites and trade-offs in fitness on alternate hosts. Ecology 81:500–508.Google Scholar
  5. Agrawal, A. A. 2000b. Specificity of induced resistance in wild radish: Causes and consequences for two specialist and two generalist caterpillars. Oikos 89:493–500.Google Scholar
  6. Agrawal, A. A. 2001. Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Science 294:321–326.Google Scholar
  7. AGrawal, A. A., Laforsch, C., and Tollrian, R. 1999a. Transgenerational induction of defenses in animals and plants. Nature 401:60–63.Google Scholar
  8. Agrawal, A. A., Strauss, S. Y., and Stout, M. J. 1999b. Costs of induced responses and tolerance to herbivory in male and female fitness components of wild radish. Evolution 53:1093–1104.Google Scholar
  9. Bartlet, E., Kiddle, G., Williams, I., and Wallsgrove, R. 1999. Wound-induced increases in the glucosinolate content of oilseed rape and their effect on subsequent herbivory by a crucifer specialist. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 91:163–167.Google Scholar
  10. Berenbaum, M. R. and Zangerl, A. R. 1998. Chemical phenotype matching between a plant and its insect herbivore. Proc. Nat. Acad. of Sci. USA 95:13743–13748.Google Scholar
  11. Berenbaum, M. R., Zangerl, A. R., and Lee, K. 1989. Chemical barriers to adaptation by a specialist herbivore. Oecologia 80:501–506.Google Scholar
  12. Blau, P. A., Feeny, P., Contardo, L., and Robson, D. S. 1978. Allylglucosinolate and herbivorous caterpillars: A contrast in toxicity and tolerance. Science 200:1296–1298.Google Scholar
  13. Bodnaryk, R. P. 1992. Effects of wounding on glucosinolates in the cotyledons of oilseed rape and mustard. Phytochemistry 31:2671–2677.Google Scholar
  14. Bones, A. M., Visvalingam, S., and Thangstad, O. P. 1994. Sulfate can induce differential expression of thioglucoside glucohydrolases (Myrosinases). Planta 193:558–566.Google Scholar
  15. Bowers, M. D. 1991. Iridoid glycosides, pp. 297-325, in G. A. Rosenthal and M. R. Berenbaum (Eds.). Herbivores: Their Interactions With Secondary Plant Metabolites, Vol. I: The Chemical Participants 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  16. Broadway, R. M. 1995. Are insects resistant to plant proteinase inhibitors? J. Insect Physiol. 41:107-116Google Scholar
  17. Brown, P. and Morra, M. 1995. Glucosinolate-containing plant tissuesas bioherbicides. J. Agric. Food Chem. 43:3070–3074.Google Scholar
  18. Chew, F. S. 1988. Searching for defensive chemistry in the Cruciferae, do glucosinolates always control interactions of Cruciferae with their potential herbivores and symbionts? No!, pp. 81-112, in K. C. Spencer (ed.). Chemical Mediation of Coevolution. Academic Press, San Diego, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  19. Dawkins, H. C. 1981. The misuse of t-tests, LSD and multiple range tests. Bull. Br. Ecol. Soc. 12:112–115.Google Scholar
  20. Dawkins, H. C. 1983. Multiple comparisons misused — Why so frequently in response-curve studies. Biometrics 39:789–790.Google Scholar
  21. Dyer, L. A. 1995. Tasty generalists and nasty specialists—Antipredator mechanisms in tropical lepidopteran larvae. Ecology 76:1483–1496.Google Scholar
  22. Engler, H. S., Spencer, K. C., and Gilbert, L. E. 2000. Insect metabolism — Preventing cyanide release from leaves. Nature 406:144–145.Google Scholar
  23. Faulkner, K., Mithen, R., and Williamson, G. 1998. Selective increase of the potential anticarcinogen 4-methylsulphinylbutyl glucosinolate in broccoli. Carcinogenesis 19:605–609.Google Scholar
  24. Feeny, P. P. 1976. Plant apparency and chemical defense, pp. 1-40, in J. W. Wallace and R. L. Mansell (Eds.). Biochemical Interaction Between Plants and Insects. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Futuyma, D. J. and Moreno, G. 1988. The evolution of ecological specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. System. 19:207–234.Google Scholar
  26. Giamoustaris, A. and Mithen, R. 1995. The effect of modifying the glucosinolate content of leaves of oilseed rape (Brassica napus ssp. oleifera) on its interaction with specialist and generalist pests. Ann. Appl. Biol. 126:347–363.Google Scholar
  27. Kliebenstein, D., Pedersen, D., Barker, B., and Mitchell-olds, T. 2002. Comparative analysis of quantitative trait loci controlling glucosinolates, myrosinase and insect resistance in Arabidapsis thaliana. Genetics 161:325–332.Google Scholar
  28. Krieger, R. I., Feeny, P. P., and Wilkinson, C. F. 1971. Detoxication enzymes in the guts of caterpillars: An evolutionary answer to plant defenses? Science 172:579-580Google Scholar
  29. Li, Q., Eigenbrode, S. D., Stringham, G. R., and Thiagarajah, M. R. 2000. Feeding and growth of Plutella xylostella and Spodoptera eridania on Brassica juncea with varying glucosinolate concentrations and myrosinase activities. J. Chem. Ecol. 26:2401–2419.Google Scholar
  30. Linhart, Y. B. 1991. Disease, parasitism and herbivory: Multidimentional challenges in plant evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6:392–396.Google Scholar
  31. Louda, S. and Mole, S. 1991. Glucosinolates: Chemistry and ecology, pp. 123-164, in G. A. Rosenthal and M. R. Berenbaum (Eds.). Herbivores: Their Interactions With Secondary Plant Metabolites, Vol. I: The Chemical Participants 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  32. Malcolm, S. B. and Zalucki, M. P. 1996. Milkweed latex and cardenolide induction may resolve the lethal plant defence paradox. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 80:193–196.Google Scholar
  33. McCloskey, C. and Isman, M. B. 1993. Influence of foliar glucosinolates in oilseed rape and mustard on feeding and growth of the bertha armyworm Mamestra configurata Walker. J. Chem. Ecol. 19:249–266.Google Scholar
  34. Ohsaki, N. and Sato, Y. 1994. Food plant choice of pieris butterflies as a trade-off between parasitoid avoidance and quality of plants. Ecology 75:59–68.Google Scholar
  35. Ratzka, A., Vogel, H., Kliebenstein, D. J., Mitchell-olds, T., and Kroymann, J. 2002. Disarming the mustard oil bomb. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 99:11223–11228.Google Scholar
  36. Renwick, J. A. A. 2001. Variable diets and changing taste in plant–insect relationships. J. Chem. Ecol. 27:1063–1076.Google Scholar
  37. Renwick, J. A. A. and Lopez, K. 1999. Experience-based food consumption by larvae of Pieris rapae: Addiction to glucosinolates? Ent. Exp. Appl. 91:51-58Google Scholar
  38. Rhoades, D. F. 1979. Evolution of plant chemical defense against herbivores, pp. 3-54, in G. A. Rosenthal and D. H. Janzen (Eds.). Herbivores: Their interation With Secondary Plant Metabolites. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Schoonhoven, L., Jermy, T., and Van Loon, J. 1998. Insect–Plant Biology. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Siemens, D. H. and Mitchell-Olds, T. 1998. Evolution of pest-induced defenses in Brassica plants: Tests of theory. Ecology 79:632–646.Google Scholar
  41. Slansky, F. and Feeny, P. 1977. Stabilization of rate of nitrogen accumulation by larvae of cabbage butterfly on wild and cultivated food plants. Ecol. Monogr. 47:209–228.Google Scholar
  42. Stowe, K. A. 1998. Realized defense of artificially selected lines of Brassica rapa: Effects of quantitative genetic variation in foliar glucosinolate concentration. Environ. Entomol. 27:1166–1174.Google Scholar
  43. Szente, L., Magisztrak, H., and Szejtli, J. 1990. Formulation of insect controlling agents with beta-cyclodextrin. Pest. Sci. 28:7–16.Google Scholar
  44. Thompson, J. N. and Cunningham, B. M. 2002. Geographic structure and dynamics of coevolutionary selection. Nature 417:735–738.Google Scholar
  45. Traw, M. B. and Dawson, T. E. 2002. Reduced performance of two specialist herbivores (Lepidoptera: Pieridae, Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on new leaves of damaged black mustard plants. Environmen. Entomol. 31:714–722.Google Scholar
  46. Usher, B. F., Bernays, E. A., Barbehenn, R. V., and Wrubel, R. P. 1989. Oral dosing of insects with feeding deterrent compounds. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 52:119–133.Google Scholar
  47. Van Dam, N. M., Hadwich, K., and Baldwin, I. T. 2000. Induced responses in Nicotiana attenuata affect behavior and growth of the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta. Oecologia 122:371–379.Google Scholar
  48. Van Dam, N. M., Van Der Meijden, E., and Verpoorte, R. 1993. Induced responses in three alkaloid-containing plant species. Oecologia 95:425–430.Google Scholar
  49. Van Der Meijden, E. 1996. Plant defence, an evolutionary dilemma: Contrasting effects of (specialist and generalist) herbivores and natural enemies. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 80:307–310.Google Scholar
  50. Verschaffelt, E. 1910. The cause determining the selection of food in some herbivorous insects. Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. 13:536–542.Google Scholar
  51. Webb, S. and Shelton, A. 1988. Laboratory rearing of the imported cabbageworm, pp. 1-6, in New York's Food and Life Sciences Bulletin No. 122. NY State Agric. Exp. St., Geneva, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Whittaker, R. H. and Feeny, P. P. 1971. Allelochemics: Chemical interactions between species. Science 171:757–770.Google Scholar
  53. Yu, E. Y., Pickering, I. J., George, G. N., and Prince, R. C. 2001. In situ observation of the generation of isothiocyanates from sinigrin in horseradish and wasabi. Biochim. Biophy. Acta 1527:156–160.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations