Fire Technology

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 173–195 | Cite as

The Collection and Analysis of Pre-evacuation Times Derived from Evacuation Trials and Their Application to Evacuation Modelling

  • S. Gwynne
  • E.R. Galea
  • J. Parke
  • J. Hickson

Abstract

This paper presents data relating to occupant pre-evacuation times from university and hospital outpatient facilities. Although the two occupancies are entirely different, they do employ relatively similar procedures: members of staff sweep areas to encourage individuals to evacuate.However the manner in which the dependent population reacts to these procedures is quite different. In the hospital case, the patients only evacuated once a member of the nursing staff had instructed them to do so, while in the university evacuation, the students were less dependent upon the actions of the staff, with over 50% of them evacuating with no prior prompting. In addition, the student pre-evacuation time was found to be dependent on their level of engagement in various activities.

data evacuation pre-evacuation hospital premises university premises 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J. Sime, “Human Behaviour In Fires Summary Report,” CFBAC Report No. 450, Portsmouth Polytechnic, 1992.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. Sime, “Escape Behaviour In Fire: ‘Panic’ Or Affiliation?,” Ph.D. Thesis, Department Of Psychology, University Of Surrey, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    G. Proulx and J. Sime, “To Prevent Panic In An Underground Emergency: Why Not Tell People The Truth?,” Fire Safety Science, 3rd Symposium, Elsevier, Applied Science, NY, 1991, pp. 843-853.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    G. Proulx, “Time Delay To Start Evacuating Upon Hearing The Fire Alarm,” in Proceedings Of Human Factors And Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting, 1994, pp. 811-815.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    G. Proulx, “Lessons Learned on Occupants' Movement Times and Behavior During Evacuation Drills,” Interflam 96, 1996, pp. 1007-1011.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    T. Geyer, L. Bellamy, R. Max-Lino, P. Harrison, Z. Bahrami, and B. Modha, “An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Components of Information Fire Warning Systems,” in Safety In The Built Environment, E and Fn Spon, J. Sime, ed., 1988, pp. 36-47Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Fire Safety Engineering in Buildings, Part 1 Guide to the Application of Fire Safety Engineering Principles, DD240: Part 1: 1997, Publisher: BSI., ISBN 0 580 27952 9, 1997.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. Gwynne, E.R. Galea, P.J. Lawrence, and L. Filippidis, “Modelling Occupant Interaction with Fire Conditions Using the Building EXODUS Model,” Fire Safety Journal, vol. 36, 2001, pp. 327-357.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    S. Gwynne, “The Introduction of Adaptive Social Decision-Making in the Mathematical Modelling of Egress Behaviour,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Greenwich, London, 2000.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    S. Gwynne, E.R. Galea, M. Owen, P.J. Lawrence, and L. Filippidis, “Review of Modelling Methodologies used in the Simulation of Evacuation,” Journal of Building and the Environment, vol. 34, 1999, pp. 441-749.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. Horasan and O. Bruck, “Investigation of a Behavioural Response Model for Fire Emergency Situations in Secondary Schools,” in Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Fire Safety Science, T.L Kasiwagi, ed., ISBN 1-886279-00-4, 1994, pp. 715-726.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    B. Latane and J.M. Darnley, “Bystander Apathy,” American Scientist, vol. 57, 1969, pp. 224-268.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    B. Latane, “The Psychology of Social Impact,” American Psychologist, vol. 36,no. 4, 1981, pp. 343-356.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Gwynne
    • 1
  • E.R. Galea
    • 1
  • J. Parke
    • 1
  • J. Hickson
    • 1
  1. 1.Fire Safety Engineering GroupUniversity of GreenwichGreenwich, LondonUK

Personalised recommendations