Natural Language & Linguistic Theory

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 543–578 | Cite as

The Kiowa Case for Feature Insertion

  • Daniel Harbour
Article

Abstract

Kiowa's rich fusional agreement system, with its systematic divergences between what is said and what is meant, shows that Morphology must permit the insertion of contextually unmarked feature values and that it is ipso facto postsyntactic.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adger, David, Susana Béjar and Daniel Harbour. 2001. ‘Adjacency, Allomorphy, and Agree’ handout from GLOW 2001.Google Scholar
  2. Adger, David and Daniel Harbour. 2003. The Syntax and Syncretisms of the Person Case Constraint, forthcoming in K. Hiraiwa and J. Sabbagh (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  3. Anceaux, Jean. 1965. The Nimboran Language: Phonology and Morphology, Martinus Nijhoff, Gravenhage.Google Scholar
  4. Bonet, Eulàlia. 1991. Morphology after Syntax: Pronominal Clitics in Romance, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  5. Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-Functional Syntax, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  6. Chomsky, Noam. 1993. ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’ in K. Hale and S. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, Noam. 1999. Derivation by Phase, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  8. Embick, David. 2000. ‘Features, Syntax and Categories in the Latin Perfect’ Linguistic Inquiry 31, 185–230.Google Scholar
  9. Foley, William. 1991. The Yimas Language of New Guinea, Stanford University Press, Stanford CA.Google Scholar
  10. Halle, Morris and Alec Marantz, 1993. ‘Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection’ in K. Hale and S. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 111–176.Google Scholar
  11. Harbour, Daniel. 2000. ‘Zero Vocabulary Items versus Impoverishment’ handout from GLOW 2000, Parasession on Null and Overt Morphology.Google Scholar
  12. Harrington, John. 1928. Vocabulary of the Kiowa Language, Bureau of American Ethnology, Vol. 84, Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  13. Inkelas, Sharon. 1993. ‘Nimboran Position Class Morphology’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11, 559–624.Google Scholar
  14. Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. ‘Severing the External Argument from its Verb’ in J. Rooryck and L. Zaring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Kluwer Dordrecht, pp. 109–137.Google Scholar
  15. Lieber, Rochelle. 1980. On the Organization of the Lexicon, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  16. Merrifield, William. 1959. ‘The Kiowa Verb Prefix’ International Journal of American Linguistics 42, 177–191.Google Scholar
  17. Noyer, Rolf. 1997. Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure, Garland, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Noyer, Rolf. 1998. ‘Impoverishment Theory and Morphosyntactic Markedness’ in S. Lapointe, D. Brentari and P. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, CSLI, Palo Alto, pp. 264–285.Google Scholar
  19. Purnell, Thomas. 1997. Principles and Parameters of Phonological Rules: Evidence from Tone Languages, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
  20. Pylkkänen, Mariliina. 2002. Introducing Arguments, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  21. Sag, Ivan and Thomas Wasow. 1999. Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  22. Takahashi, Junichi. 1984. Case Marking in Kiowa: A Study in the Organization of Meaning, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
  23. Trager, Elizabeth. 1960. The Kiowa Language: A Grammatical Study, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, PA.Google Scholar
  24. Trommer, Jochen. 1997. ‘Morphology Consuming Syntax’ Resources: Generation and Parsing in a Minimalist Version of Distributed Morphology' unpublished manuscript, Universität Potsdam.Google Scholar
  25. Watkins, Laurel with Parker McKenzie. 1984. A Grammar of Kiowa, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln and London.Google Scholar
  26. Wonderly, William, Lorna Gibson and Paul Kirk. 1954. ‘Number in Kiowa: Nouns, Demonstratives, and Adjectives’ International Journal of American Linguistics 20, 1–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Harbour
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Linguistics & PhilosophyMIT E39-232CambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations