Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 253–255 | Cite as

MCMI Results for Batterers: A Response to Gondolf

  • Don Dutton
Article

Abstract

Gondolph [Gondolf, E. W. (1999). J. Fam. Violence 14: 1–17] recently published MCMI-III results on men in batterer treatment groups that appeared to indicate much lower levels of psychopathology than previous studies. Gondolph concluded from these results that the existence of an “abusive personality” was debatable. Gondolph is mistaken in drawing conclusions about the abusive personality based solely on MCMI results. The assessment of the abusive personality is not based on this instrument. Also, respondents in Gondolph's study had extremely high Desirability scores on the MCMI-III, so even his estimates of the incidence of personality disorder are questionable. Current assessment of personality disorder has begun to steer away from self-report instruments such as the MCMI-III; this practice should be utilized in assessing batterers.

MCMI-III batterers treatment domestic violence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beasley, R., and Stoltenberg, C. (1992). Personality characteristics of male spouse abusers. Prof. Psycho.: Res. Pract. 23: 310–317.Google Scholar
  2. Dutton, D. G. (1994a). The origin and structure of the abusive personality. J. Pers. Disord. 8: 181–191.Google Scholar
  3. Dutton, D. G. (1994b). Patriarchy and wife assault: The ecological fallacy. Violence Vict. 9: 125–140.Google Scholar
  4. Dutton, D. G. (1995). A scale for measuring the propensity for abusiveness. J. Fam. Violence 10: 203–221.Google Scholar
  5. Dutton, D. G (1998). The Abusive Personality: Violence and Control in Intimate Relationships, Guilford, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Dutton, D. G., and Hemphill, K. J. (1992). Patterns of socially desirable responding among perpetrators and victims of wife assault. Violence Vict. 7: 29–39.Google Scholar
  7. Gondolf, E. W. (1999). MCMI-III results for batterer program participants in four cities: Less “pathological” than expected. J. Fam. Violence 14: 1–17.Google Scholar
  8. Hamberger, L. K., and Hastings, J. E. (1986). Personality correlates of men who abuse their partners: A cross-validational study. J. Fam. Violence 1: 323–341.Google Scholar
  9. Hart, S. D., Dutton, D. G., and Newlove, T. (1993). The prevalence of personality disorder among wife assaulters. J. Pers. Disord. 7: 329–341.Google Scholar
  10. Oldham, J., Clarkin, J., Appelbaum, A., Carr, A., Kernberg, P., Lotterman, A., and Haas, G. (1985). A self-report instrument for Borderline Personality Organization. In McGlashan, T. H. (ed.), The Borderline: Current Empirical Research (The Progress in Psychiatry Series), American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  11. Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence Vict. 4: 159–177.Google Scholar
  12. Siegel, J. (1986). The multidimensional anger inventory. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51: 191–200.Google Scholar
  13. Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Steinmetz, S. (1980). Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family. Anchor Press/Doubleday, Garden City, NY.Google Scholar
  14. Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (1985). Is family violence increasing? A comparison of the 1975 and 1985 national survey rates. Paper Presented at the American Society of Criminology, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  15. Westen, D., and Shedler, J. (1999a). Revising and Assessing Axis II, Part 1: Developing a clinically empirically valid assessment method. Am. J. Psychiatry 156: 258–272.Google Scholar
  16. Westen, D., and Shedler, J. (1999b) Revising and Assessing Axis II, Part II: Toward an empirically based and clinically useful classification of personality disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 156: 273–285.Google Scholar
  17. Yllo, K., and Bograd, M. (1988). Feminist Perspectives on Wife Assault, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations