Argumentation

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 203–217

What Are We to Think about Thought Experiments?

  • Lawrence Souder
Article

Abstract

Arguments from thought experiment ask the reader to imagine some hypothetical, sometimes exotic, often fantastic, scenario for the sake of illustrating or countering some claim. Variously characterized as mental experimentation, imaginary cases, and even crazy cases, thought experiments figure into both scientific and philosophical arguments. They are often criticized for their fictive nature and for their lack of grounding. Nevertheless, they are common especially in arguments in ethics and philosophy of mind. Moreover, many thought experiments have spawned variations that attempt to both affirm and refute their original arguments. These emended thought experiments exhibit a variety of styles, details, and embellishments. A rhetorical analysis of these variations suggests a reciprocal influence between the arguers' selection of details and their philosophical commitments. I offer examples of this relationship from the variations on John Searle's Chinese Room thought experiment and Judith Thomson's unconscious violinist thought experiment.

Analogy argument Chinese Room gendankenexperiment hypothetical narrative philosophy of mind rhetoric thought experiment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Aristotle: 1984, Rhetoric (W. Rhys Roberts, Trans.), The Modern Library, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Barry, Brian: 1979, ‘On Editing Ethics’, Ethics vn90 (1), 1-6.Google Scholar
  3. Beckwith, F. J.: 1992, ‘Personal Bodily Rights, Abortion, and Unplugging the Violinist’, International Philosophical Quarterly 32(1), 105-118.Google Scholar
  4. Brooks, D. H. M.: 1994, ‘The Method of Thought Experiment’, Metaphilosophy 25(1), 71-83.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, J. R.: 1992, ‘Why Empiricism Won't Work’, PSA 1992 2, 271-279.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, J. R.: 1991, The Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  7. Bruner, J.: 1991, ‘The Narrative Construction of Reality’, Critical Inquiry 18(1), 1-21.Google Scholar
  8. Chandra, S.: 1977, Identity and Thought Experiments, Institute of Advanced Study, Simla.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, M.: 1983, ‘Foetuses, Famous Violinists, and the Right to Continued Aid’, Philosophical Quarterly 33(132), 259-278.Google Scholar
  10. Dennett, D. C.: 1995, ‘In Defense of AI’, in Peter Baumgartner (ed.), Speaking Minds: Interviews with Twenty Eminent Cognitive Scientists, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 57-69.Google Scholar
  11. Dennett, D. C.: 1991, Consciousness Explained, Little Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
  12. Dennett, D. C.: 1987, The Intentional Stance, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  13. Dennett, D. C.: 1980, ‘The Milk of Human Intentionality’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 428-430.Google Scholar
  14. Finnis, J.: 1973, ‘The Rights and Wrongs of Abortion: A Reply to Thomson’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 2(2), 135-145.Google Scholar
  15. Goodin, R. E.: 1982, Political Theory and Public Policy, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  16. Gooding, D. C.: 1992, ‘What is Experimental about Thought Experiments?’, PSA 1992 2, 280-290.Google Scholar
  17. Hacking, I.: 1992, ‘Do Thought Experiments Have a Life of Their Own? PSA 1992 2, 302-308.Google Scholar
  18. Hare, R. M.: 1981, Moral Thinking, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Hofstadter, D. R. and D. C. Dennett (eds.): 1981, The Mind's I: Fantasies and Reflections of Self and Soul, Bantam Books, Toronto.Google Scholar
  20. Irvine, A. D.: 1991, ‘Thought Experiments in Scientific Reasoning’, in T. Horowitz and G. J. Massey (eds.), Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Savage, MD, pp. 149-165.Google Scholar
  21. Jackson, M. W.: 1992, ‘The Gedankenexperiment method of Ethics’, The Journal of Value Inquiry 26, 525-535.Google Scholar
  22. Locke, J.: 1975, ‘Of Identity and Diversity’, in J. Perry (ed.), Personal Identity, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 33-52.Google Scholar
  23. MacKinnon, C. A.: 1989, Toward a Feminist Theory of State, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Nersessian, N. J.: 1992, ‘In the Theoretician's Laboratory: Thought Experimenting as Mental Modeling’, PSA 2, 291-301.Google Scholar
  25. Norton, J.: 1991, ‘Thought Experiments in Einstein's Work’, in T. Horowitz and G.J. Massey (eds.), Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Savage, MD, pp. 129-148.Google Scholar
  26. Parfit, D.: 1984, Reasons and Persons, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  27. Perelman, C. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1969, The New Rhetoric, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  28. Searle, J. R.: 1994, The Rediscovery of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  29. Searle, J. R.: 1983, Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  30. Searle, J. R.: 1980, ‘Minds, Brains, and Programs’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, 451-455.Google Scholar
  31. Shapin, S.: 1984, ‘Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle's Literary Technology’, Social Studies of Science 14, 481-520.Google Scholar
  32. Sorensen, R. A.: 1992, Thought Experiments, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  33. Steinem, G.: 1983, Outrageous Acts and Everyday Rebellions, Holt, Reinhart, and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Thomson, J. J.: 1971, ‘A Defense of Abortion’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 1(1), 47-66.Google Scholar
  35. Unger, P.: 1990, Identity, Consciousness, and Value, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Warren, M. A.: 1973, ‘On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion’, Monist 57(1), 43-61.Google Scholar
  37. Wennberg, R.: 1985, Life in the Balance: Exploring the Abortion Controversy, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids, MI.Google Scholar
  38. Wilkes, K. V.: 1988, Real People: Personal Identity Without Thought Experiments, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  39. Wreen, M.: 1992, ‘Abortion and Pregnancy Due to Rape’, Philosophia, Philosophical Quarterly of Israel 21(3 and 4), 201-220.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence Souder
    • 1
  1. 1.Culture and CommunicationDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations