Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 111–123 | Cite as

The porous structure of pulp fibres with different yields and its influence on paper strength

  • Bo Andreasson
  • Jennie Forsström
  • Lars WågbergEmail author
Article

Abstract

The porous structure of the interior of papermaking fibres is a well-known important property of the fibres. Changes of this structure will influence tensile and burst strength of paper formed from the fibres and a change in pore size of the pores within the fibre wall is also important for the ability of molecules to diffuse in and out of the fibre wall. Relevant examples of this latter effect are the removal of lignin during cooking and the addition of performance chemicals during papermaking. In this paper, pore sizes and the pore size distribution of unbleached softwood fibres have been studied. A well-characterised fibre material consisting of laboratory cooked spruce and pine pulp of various lignin contents was used. Pore size and pore size distribution were measured by studies of the relaxation behaviour of 2H in fibres saturated with 2H2O. Beside this the total and surface charge of the fibres were also measured together with strength properties of papers from unbeaten fibres. For both pulps, there is a maximum in pore radius at a yield around 46%. Calculations of fibre wall volume from water retention values and yield levels show that there is a discontinuity in pore radius as a function of the fibre wall volume around a yield of 51%. It is suggested that this discontinuity is caused by the breakdown of the hemicellulose/lignin matrix within the fibre wall at this yield level. The strength of the papers formed from the fibres shows a correlation with the surface charge of the fibres. Based on the change in surface charge with yield and the change in total charge with yield, this correlation is suggested to be due to an opening up of the external part of the fibre wall. This stresses the importance of the chemical composition and physical structure of the outer layer of the fibre wall.

Charge Electrostatics Fibre wall volume Fibres Pore size distribution Pore size Softwood fibres Swelling Tensile strength Unbleached fibres 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alince B. and van de Ven T.G.M. 1997. Porosity of swollen pulp fibres evaluated by polymer adsorption. In: Baker C.F. (ed.), The Fundamentals of Papermaking Materials. Transactions of the 11th Fundamental Research Symposium held at Cambridge., pp. 771-788.Google Scholar
  2. Atkins P.W. 1998. Physical Chemistry. 6th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  3. Brown W., Stilbs P. and Lindström T. 1984. Self-diffusion of small molecules in cellulose gels using FT-pulsed field gradient NMR. J. Appl. Polymer Sci. 29: 823-827.Google Scholar
  4. Davis P.J. and Smith D.M. 1989. Using NMR spectroscopy to analyze the pore structure of coatings. Tappi J. 72: 85-89.Google Scholar
  5. Duchesne I. and Daniel G. 1999. The ultrastructure of wood fibre surfaces as shown by a variety of microscopical methods-A review. Nordic Pulp Paper Res. J. 14: 129-139.Google Scholar
  6. Gallegos D.P., Munn K., Smith D.M. and Stermer D.L. 1987. An NMR technique for the analysis of pore structure: application to materials with well defined pore structure. J. Coll. Interface Sci. 119: 127-140.Google Scholar
  7. Gallegos D.P. and Smith D.M. 1988. An NMR technique for the analysis of pore structure: determination of continuous pore size distributions. J. Coll. Interface Sci. 122: 143-153.Google Scholar
  8. Gellerstedt F., Wågberg L. and Gatenholm P. 2000. Swelling behaviour of succinylated fibres. Cellulose 7: 67-86.Google Scholar
  9. Grignon J. and Scallan A.M. 1980. Effects of pH and neutral salts upon the swelling of cellulose gels. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 25: 2829-2843.Google Scholar
  10. Häggkvist M., Li T.-Q. and Ödberg L. 1998. Effects of drying and pressing on the pore structure in the cellulose fibre wall studied by 1H and 2H NMR relaxation. Cellulose 5: 33-49.Google Scholar
  11. Israelachvili J.N. 1985. Intermolecular and Surface Forces. With Applications to Colloidal and Biological Systems. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  12. Katz S., Beatson R.P. and Scallan A.M. 1984. The determination of strong and weak acidic groups in sulfite pulps. Svensk Papperstidning 6: R48-R53.Google Scholar
  13. Li T.-Q., Henriksson U. and Ödberg L. 1993. Determination of pore sizes in wood cellulose fibers by 2H and 1H NMR. Nordic Pulp Paper Res. J. 8: 326-330.Google Scholar
  14. Li T.-Q. 1991. Interaction between water and cellulose fibers. Ph.D. Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  15. Li T.-Q., Henriksson U., Klason T. and Ödberg L. 1992. Water diffusion in wood pulp cellulose fibres studied by means of the pulse gradient spin echo method. J. Coll. Interface Sci. 154: 305-315.Google Scholar
  16. Li T.-Q., Henriksson U. and Ödberg L. 1995. Determination of pore volume in cellulose fibers by the pulsed gradient spin-echo NMR technique. J. Coll. Interface Sci. 169: 376-379.Google Scholar
  17. Li T.-Q., Häggkvist M. and Ödberg L. 1997. Porous structure of cellulose fibers studied by Q-Space NMR Imaging. Langmuir 13: 3570-3574.Google Scholar
  18. Lindström T. 1986a. The concept and measurement of fibre swelling. In: Bristow J.A. and Kolseth P. (eds), Paper. Structure and Properties. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp. 75-97.Google Scholar
  19. Lindström T. 1986b. The porous lamellar structure of the cell wall. In: Bristow J.A. and Kolseth P. (eds), Paper. Structure and Properties. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp. 99-120.Google Scholar
  20. Maloney T.C., Li T.-Q., Weise U. and Paulapuro H. 1997. Intra-and inter-fibre pore closure in wet pressing. Appita J. 50: 301-306.Google Scholar
  21. Maloney T.C. 2000. On the pore structure and dewatering properties of the pulp fiber cell wall. Ph.D. Thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland.Google Scholar
  22. Munn K. and Smith D.M. 1987. A NMR technique for the analysis of pore structure: numerical inversion of relaxation measurements. J. Coll. Interface Sci. 119: 117-126.Google Scholar
  23. Nilsson B., Wågberg L. and Gray D. 2001. Conformability of wet pulp fibres at small length scales. In: Baker C.F. (ed.), The Fundamentals of Papermaking Processes. Pira International, Oxford, UK, pp. 211-224.Google Scholar
  24. Norgren M. and Lindström B. 2000. Physico-chemical characterisation of fractionated kraft lignins. Holzforschung 54: 528-534.Google Scholar
  25. Provencher S.W. 1982a. A constrained regularisation method for inverting data represented by linear algebraic or integral equations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 27: 213-227.Google Scholar
  26. Provencher S.W. 1982b. Contin: A general purpose constrained regularisation program for inverting noisy linear algebraic and integral equations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 27: 229-242.Google Scholar
  27. Scallan A.M. and Carles J.E. 1972. The correlation of the water retention value with the fibre saturation point. Svensk Papperstidning 75: 699-703.Google Scholar
  28. Stone J.E. and Scallan A.M. 1965a. Effect of component removal upon the porous structure of the cell wall of wood. J. Polym. Sci. Part C 11: 13-25.Google Scholar
  29. Stone J.E. and Scallan A.M. 1965b. Influence of drying on the pore structures of the cell wall. In: Bolam F. (ed.), Consolidation of the Paper Web. Technical Section BP and BMA, London, pp. 145-174.Google Scholar
  30. Stone J.E. and Scallan A.M. 1967. The effect of component removal upon the porous structure of the cell wall of wood. Part II. Swelling in water and the fiber saturation point. Tappi J. 50: 496-501.Google Scholar
  31. Stone J.E. and Scallan A.M. 1968. The effect of component removal upon the porous structure of the cell wall of wood. Part III. A comparison between the sulphite and kraft process. Pulp Paper Magazine Canada 69: T288-T293.Google Scholar
  32. Swerin A. and Wågberg L. 1994. Size-exclusion chromatography for characterization of cationic polyelectrolytes used in papermaking. Nordic Pulp Paper Res. J. 9: 18-25.Google Scholar
  33. Vold R.L., Waugh J.S., Klein M.P. and Phelps D.E. 1968. Measurement of spin relaxation in complex systems. J. Chem. Phys. 48: 3831-3832.Google Scholar
  34. Wågberg L. and Annergren G. 1997. Physico-chemical characterisation of papermaking fibres. In: Baker C.F. (ed.), The Fundamentals of Papermaking Materials. Pira International, Cambridge, UK, pp. 1-82.Google Scholar
  35. Wågberg L., Ödberg L. and Glad-Nordmark G. 1989. Charge determination of porous substrates by polyelectrolyte adsorption. Part 1. Carboxymethylated, bleached cellulosic fibers. Nordic Pulp Paper Res. J. 4: 71-76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bo Andreasson
    • 1
  • Jennie Forsström
    • 2
  • Lars Wågberg
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.SCA Graphic Research ABSundsvallSweden
  2. 2.Fibre Science and Communication NetworkMidsweden UniversitySundsvallSweden
  3. 3.Fibre ChemistryMidsweden UniversitySundsvallSweden

Personalised recommendations