Advertisement

Science & Education

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 261–287 | Cite as

The Role of Photographs and Films in Kettlewell's Popularizations of the Phenomenon of Industrial Melanism

  • David Wÿss Rudge
Article

Abstract

H.B.D. Kettlewell's investigations on the phenomenon of industrial melanism are generally referred to in textbooks and other popularizations of science as the classic demonstration of natural selection (Majerus 1989). A central question for historians of this episode is accounting for why public perceptions of the importance of Kettlewell's work have diverged from those of researchers who actually work on the phenomenon. In a recent paper published in Biology and Philosophy, Joel Hagen draws attention to the role Kettlewell and his colleagues played in idealizing his investigations as an example of controlled experimentation in their several retrospective popular accounts. The present essay discusses the important role photographic and film depictions of differential bird predation played in Kettlewell's popularizations. This analysis supports Hagen's contentions that Kettlewell deftly and strategically used these visual representations to command assent to his interpretation of the phenomenon and shore up claims about the scientific legitimacy and importance of his work. It nevertheless disputes that these images were intended to portray Kettlewell's experiments as an example of controlled experimentation. In a concluding section, the essay draws several morals from this analysis regarding the use of popularized articles and visual images to teach science.

Keywords

Natural Selection Control Experimentation Visual Image Visual Representation Central Question 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allchin, D.: 2001, ‘Kettlewell's Missing Evidence, A Study in Black and White’, Journal of College Science Teaching 31(4), 240–245.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, P.M.B.: 1955, ‘Review of E. B. Ford's Moths’, The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation 67, 103–104.Google Scholar
  3. Cain, A.J. & Sheppard, P.: 1950, ‘Selection in the Polymorphic Land Snail Cepaea nemoralis' Heredity 4, 275–294.Google Scholar
  4. Clarke, C.A.: 1979, ‘Dr. Henry Bernard Davis Kettlewell (1907-1979)’, Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation 79(10), 253–255.Google Scholar
  5. Dobzhansky, Th.: 1951, Genetics and the Origin of Species, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Dowdeswell, W.H.: 1960, Genetics of the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Ford, E.B.: 1940, ‘Problems of Heredity in the Lepidoptera’, Biological Reviews 12, 461–503.Google Scholar
  8. Ford, E.B.: 1955, Moths, Collins, London.Google Scholar
  9. Ford, E.B.: 1960, ‘Evolution in Progress’, in Tax, S. (ed.), Evolution after Darwin, Vol. 1, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Ford, E.B.: 1964, Ecological Genetics, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  11. Ford, E.B.: 1981, Taking Genetics into the Countryside, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London.Google Scholar
  12. Hagen, J.: 1999, ‘Retelling Experiments: H.B.D. Kettlewell's Studies of Industrial Melanism in Peppered Moths’, Biology and Philosophy 14(1), 39–54.Google Scholar
  13. Haldane, J.B.S.: 1924, ‘A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection’, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 23, 19–41.Google Scholar
  14. Heslop-Harrison, J.W.: 1956, ‘Melanism in the Lepidoptera’, The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation 68, 172–181.Google Scholar
  15. Kettlewell, H.B.D.: 1955a, Evolution in Progress (cinematographer N. Tinbergen)-silent popularization of the selection experiments film distributed by British Universities Film and Video Council, London.Google Scholar
  16. Kettlewell, H.B.D.: 1955b, ‘Selection Experiments on Industrial Melanism in the Lepidoptera’, Heredity 9, 323–342.Google Scholar
  17. Kettlewell, H.B.D.: 1955c, ‘How Industrialization Can Alter Species’, Discovery 16(12), 507–511.Google Scholar
  18. Kettlewell, H.B.D.: 1956a, ‘Evolution in Action’, Times Science Review 19(Spring), 10–11.Google Scholar
  19. Kettlewell, H.B.D.: 1956b, ‘Further Selection Experiments on Industrial Melanism in the Lepidoptera’, Heredity 10, 287–301.Google Scholar
  20. Kettlewell, H.B.D.: 1958, ‘Evolution and the Environment’, The New Scientist 4(3), 297–299.Google Scholar
  21. Kettlewell, H.B.D.: 1959, ‘Darwin's Missing Evidence’, Scientific American 200(3), 48–53.Google Scholar
  22. Kettlewell, H.B.D.: 1961a, Evolution in Progress (cinematographer N. Tinbergen)-sound popularization of the selection experiments film distributed by British Universities Film and Video Council, London.Google Scholar
  23. Kettlewell, H.B.D.: 1961b, ‘The Advantage of Colour Photography in the Study of Animal Adaptations’, Medical and Biological Illustration 11, 2–3.Google Scholar
  24. Kettlewell, H.B.D.: 1964 'Natural History and Air Pollution’, The New Scientist 22(385), 34.Google Scholar
  25. Kettlewell, H.B.D.: 1973, The Evolution of Melanism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  26. Majerus, M.E.N.: 1989, ‘Melanic Polymorphism in the Peppered Moth Biston betularia and other Lepidoptera’, Journal of Biological Education 23, 267–284.Google Scholar
  27. Majerus, M.E.N.: 1998, Melanism: Evolution in Action, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  28. Mikkola, K.: 1984, ‘On the Selective Forces Acting in the Industrial Melanism of Biston and Oligia Moths (Lepidoptera, Geometridae and Noctuidae)’, Heredity 52, 9–16.Google Scholar
  29. Minnion, W.E.: 1955, ‘Thoughts on Reading Dr. Ford's Book “Moths”’, The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation 67, 264–266.Google Scholar
  30. Rudge, D.W.: 1999, ‘Taking the Peppered Moth with a Grain of Salt’, Biology and Philosophy 14(1), 9–37.Google Scholar
  31. Rudge, D.W.: 2000, ‘Does Being Wrong Make Kettlewell Wrong for Science Teaching?’, Journal of Biological Education 35(1), 5–11.Google Scholar
  32. Sheppard, P.M.: 1958, Natural Selection and Heredity, Philosophical Library, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Sheppard, P.M.: 1959, ‘The Evolution of Mimicry: a Problem in Ecology and Genetics’, Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 24, 131–140.Google Scholar
  34. Tinbergen, N.: 1958, Curious Naturalists, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Tinbergen, N.: 1978-1979. 'Happy Moments with Bernard Kettlewell’, Lycidas 7, 58–60.Google Scholar
  36. Wells, J.: 2000, Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth? Why Much of What We Teach About Evolution is Wrong, Regnery Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Wÿss Rudge
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological Sciences & The Mallinson Institute for Science EducationWestern Michigan UniversityKalamazooU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations