Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 219–225 | Cite as

Epidemiological Considerations in the Conceptualization and Utilization of “Prevalence” and “Incidence Rate” in Family Violence Research: A Reply to Brownridge and Halli (1999)

  • Sonia HélieEmail author
  • Marie-Eve Clément
  • Marie-Claude Larrivée
Article

Abstract

Brownridge and Halli (1999) have argued that the literature on family violence is beset by confusion in the conceptualization and utilization of incidence and prevalence terminology. Although we basically agree with the authors' diagnosis of the field, definitions of prevalence and incidence that they propose as gold standards are sometimes discrepant with established concepts in epidemiology. Drawing on the epidemiologic literature, we present more solidly based and operational definitions of these terms and try to understand the meaning of each measure. The same confusion surrounding use of prevalence and incidence also reigns in child maltreatment research, as revealed in our review of major studies. We address some of the main but often overlooked issues associated with use of epidemiologic measures in an area of social research such as family violence and make some proposals.

measurement family violence incidence prevalence epidemiology child maltreatment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahlbom, A., and Norell, S. (1990). Introduction to Modern Epidemiology, Epidemiology Resources, Newton Lower Fall, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Altemeier, W. A., O'Connor, S., Sherrod, K. B., and Tucker, D. (1986). Outcome of abuse during childhood among pregnant low income women. Child Abuse Negl. 10(3): 319–330.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, O. W., Miller-Perrin, C. L., and Perrin, R. D. (1997). Family Violence Across the Lifespan: An Introduction, Sage, Thousand, Oak, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Beaucage, C., and Bonnier-Viger, Y. (1996). épidémiologie appliquée: Une initiation à la lecture critique de la littérature en sciences de la santé, Gaëtan Morin Editeur Ltée, Montréal.Google Scholar
  5. Bernard, P.-M., and Lapointe, C. (1995). Mesures statistiques en épidémiologie, Presses de l'Université du Québec, Québec.Google Scholar
  6. Bertolli, J., Morgenstern, H., and Sorenson, S. B. (1995). Estimating the occurrence of child maltreatment and risk-factor effects: Benefits of a mixed-design strategy in epidemiologic research. Child Abuse Negl. 19(8): 1007–1016.Google Scholar
  7. Brownridge, D. A., and Halli, S. S. (1999). Measuring family violence: The conceptualization and utilization of prevalence and incidence rates. J. Fam. Violence 14(4): 333–349.Google Scholar
  8. Buntain-RicklefsJ. J., Kemper, K. J., Bell, M., and Banonis, T. (1994). Punishments: What predicts adult approval Child Abuse Negl. 18(11): 945–955.Google Scholar
  9. Deley, W. W. (1988). Physical punishment of children: Sweden and USA. J. Comp. Fam. Stud. 19(3): 419–431.Google Scholar
  10. Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G. T., and Rice, M. E. (1998). On the validity of self-reported rates of interpersonal violence. J. Interpers. Violence 13: 58–72.Google Scholar
  11. Hennekens, C. H., Buring, J. E., and Mayrent, S. L. (1987). Epidemiology in Medicine, Little Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
  12. Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., and Morgenstern, H. (1982). Epidemiologic Research: Principles and Quantitative Methods, Lifetime Learning, Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
  13. Koss, M. P. (1992). The underdetection of rape: Methodological choices influence incidence estimates. J. Sociol. Issues 48: 61–75.Google Scholar
  14. Last, J. M. (1983). A Dictionary of Epidemiology, Oxford University Press, New-York.Google Scholar
  15. MacMillan, H. L., Flemming, J. E., Trocmé, N., Boyle, M. H., Wong, M., Racine, Y A., Bearsdlee, W. R., and Offord, D. R. (1997). Prevalence of child physical and sexual abuse in the community. JAMA 278(2): 131–135.Google Scholar
  16. McClelland, R. W., and Battle, S. F. (1984). Applying social epidemiology to child abuse: Social Casework J. Contemp. Soc. Work: 212–218.Google Scholar
  17. Miettinen, O.S. (1976). Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. Am. J. Epidemiol. 103(2): 226–236.Google Scholar
  18. Morgenstern, H., Kleinbaum, D.G., and Kupper, L.L. (1980). Measures of disease incidence used in epidemiologic research. Int. J. Epidemiol. 9(1): 97–104.Google Scholar
  19. National Research Council (1993). Understanding Child Abuse and Neglect, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  20. Sariola, H., and Uutela, A. (1992). The prevalence and context of family violence against children in Finland. Child Abuse Negl. 16: 823–832.Google Scholar
  21. Schafer, M. R., Sobieraj, K., and Hollyfield, R. L. (1988). Prevalence of childhood physical abuse in adult male veteran alcoholics. Child Abuse Negl. 12(2): 141–149.Google Scholar
  22. Sedlack, A. J., and Broadhurst, D. D. (1996). Third national incidence study of child abuse and neglect. Final report, National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  23. Starr, R. H., Dubowitz, H., and Bush, B. A. (1990). The epidemiology of child maltreatment. In Ammerman, R.T., and Hensen, M. (Eds.), Children at Risk: An Evaluation of Factors Contributing to Child Abuse and Neglect, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 23–53.Google Scholar
  24. Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (1990). How violent are American families? Estimates from the National Family Violence survey and other studies. In Straus, M. A., and Gelles, R. J. (Eds.), Physical Violence in American Families. Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8, 145 families, Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  25. Straus, M. A., and Hamby, S. L. (1997). Measuring physical and psychological maltreatment of children with the Conflict Tactics Scales. In Kaufman Kantor, G., and Jasinski, J. L. (Eds.), Out of Darkness: Contemporary Perspectives on Family Violence, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 119–135.Google Scholar
  26. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Finkelhor, D., Moore, D. W., and Runyan, D. (1998). Identification of child maltreatment with the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scale: Development and psychometric data for a national sample of American parents. Child Abuse Negl. 22(4): 249–270.Google Scholar
  27. Trocmé, N., McPhee, D., and Kwan Tam, K. (1995). Child abuse and neglect in Ontario: Incidence and characteristics. Child Welfare 74(3): 563–582.Google Scholar
  28. Tzeng, O. C. S., Jackson, J. W., and Karlson, H. C. (1991). Theories of Child Abuse and Neglect: Differential Perspective, Summaries, and Evaluations, Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Vissing, Y. M., Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., and Harrop, J. W. (1991). Verbal aggression by parents and psychological problems of children Child Abuse Negl. 15: 223–238.Google Scholar
  30. Wang, C. T., and Daro, D. (1998). Current Trends in Child Abuse Reporting and Fatalities: The Results of the 1997 Annual Fifty State Survey, Center on Child Abuse Prevention Research, National Committee to Prevent Child Abuse, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonia Hélie
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marie-Eve Clément
    • 1
  • Marie-Claude Larrivée
    • 1
  1. 1.Groupe de Recherche et d'Action sur la Victimisation des EnfantsUniversité du Québec à MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations