Biology and Philosophy

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 219–247 | Cite as

Unlocking the Black Box between Genotype and Phenotype: Cell Condensations as Morphogenetic (modular) Units

  • Brian K. Hall
Article

Abstract

Embryonic development and ontogeny occupy whatis often depicted as the black box betweengenes – the genotype – and the features(structures, functions, behaviors) of organisms– the phenotype; the phenotype is not merelya one-to-one readout of the genotype. Thegene’s home, context, and locus of operation isthe cell. Initially, in ontogeny, that cell isthe single-celled zygote. As developmentensues, multicellular assemblages of like cells(modules) progressively organized as germlayers, embryonic fields, anlage,condensations, or blastemata, enable genes toplay their roles in development and evolution.As modules, condensations are fundamentaldevelopmental and selectable units ofmorphology (morphogenetic units) that mediateinteractions between genotype and phenotype viaevolutionary developmental mechanisms. In ahierarchy of emergent processes, gene networksand gene cascades (genetic modules) link thegenotype with morphogenetic units such ascondensations, while epigenetic processes suchas embryonic inductions, tissue interactionsand functional integration, link morphogeneticunits to the phenotype. To support theseconclusions I distinguish units of heredityfrom units of transmission and discussepigenetic inheritance by tracing the historyof relationship between embryology andevolution, especially the role(s) assigned tocells or to cellular components in generatingtheories of morphological change in evolution.The concept of cells as modular morphogeneticunits is modeled and illustrated using themammalian dentary bone.

cell condensations development embryonic fields epigenetics evolution evolutionary developmental biology genotype modularity modules morphogenetic units phenotype 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abouheif, E.: 1997. ‘Developmental Genetics and Homology: A Hierarchical Approach’, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12, 405–408.Google Scholar
  2. Arthur, W.: 1997, The Origin of Animal Body Plans: A Study in Evolutionary developmental Biology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. Arthur, W.: 2000, ‘The Concept of Developmental Reprogramming and the Quest for an Inclusive Theory of Evolutionary Mechanisms’, Evolution and Development 2, 49–57.Google Scholar
  4. Atchley, W.R. and Hall, B.K.: 1991, ‘A Model for Development and Evolution of Complex Morphological Structures and Its Application to the Mammalian Mandible’, Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 66, 101–157.Google Scholar
  5. Baer, K.E. von.: 1828. Ñber Entwicklungsgeschichte der Thiere. Beobachtung und Reflexion, Gebrüder, Bornträger, Königsberg.Google Scholar
  6. Bailey, D.: 1986, ‘Genes that Affect Morphogenesis of the Murine Mandible, Recombinant Inbred Strain Analysis’, Journal of Heredity 77, 17–25.Google Scholar
  7. Barlow, A.J. and Francis-West, P.H.: 1997, ‘Ectopic Application of Recombinant BMP-2 and BMP-4 can Change Patterning of Developing Chick Facial Primordia’, Development 124, 391–398.Google Scholar
  8. Bate, M. and Arias, A.M.: 1991. ‘The Embryonic Origin of Imaginal Discs in Drosophila’, Development 112, 755–761.Google Scholar
  9. Beurton, P.J., Falk, R. and Rheinberger, H.-J. (eds): 2000, The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  10. Bolker, J.A.: 2000, ‘Modularity in Development and Why it Matters to Evo-Devo’, American Zoologist 40, 770–776.Google Scholar
  11. Byatt, A.S.: 1986. Still Life, Penguin Books, London.Google Scholar
  12. Carroll, S.B., Grenier, J.K. and Weatherbee, S.D.: 2001, From DNA to Diversity. Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design, Blackwell Science, Malden, MA.Google Scholar
  13. Chandebois, R. and Faber, J.: 1983, Automation in Animal Development. A New Theory Derived from the Concept of Cell Sociology, Monographs in Developmental Biology, Volume 16, S. Karger AG, Basle.Google Scholar
  14. Cheverud, J.M., Hartman, S.E., Richtsmeier, J.T. and Atchley, W.R.: 1991, ‘1A Quantitative Aenetic Analysis of Localized Morphology in Mandibles of Inbred Mice Using Finite Element Scaling Analysis’, Journal of Craniofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology 11, 122–137.Google Scholar
  15. Cheverud, J.M., Routman, E.J. and Irschick, D.J.: 1997, ‘Pleiotropic Effects of Individual Gene Loci on Mandibular Morphology’, Evolution 51, 2006–2016.Google Scholar
  16. Conklin, E.G.: 1905, ‘The Mutation Theory from the Standpoint of Cytology’, Science 21, 525–529.Google Scholar
  17. Darwin, C.: 1859, The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, John Murray, London.Google Scholar
  18. Dos Reis, S.F., Duarte, L.C., Monteiro, R. and von Zuben, F.J.: 2002, ‘Geographic Variation in Cranial Morphology in Thrichomys apereoides (Rodentia: Echimyidae). I. Geometric Descriptors and Patterns of Variation in Shape’, Journal of Mammalogy 83, 333–344.Google Scholar
  19. Duarte, L.C., Monteiro, L.R., von Zuben, F.J. and Dos Reis, S.F.: 2000, ‘Variation in Mandible Shape in Thrichomys apereoides (Mammalia: Rodentia): Geometric Analysis of a Complex Morphological Structure’, Systematic Biology 49, 563–578.Google Scholar
  20. Dunlop, L.-L.T. and Hall, B.K.: 1995, ‘Relationships between Cellular Condensation, Preosteoblast Formation and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Interactions in Initiation of Osteogenesis’, International Journal of Developmental Biology 39, 357–371.Google Scholar
  21. Ferrari, D., Kosher, R.A. and Dealy, C.N.: 1994, ‘Limb Mesenchymal Cells Inhibited from Undergoing Cartilage Differentiation by a Tumor Promoting Phorbol Ester Maintain Expression of the Homeobox-Containing Gene Msx1 and Fail to Exhibit Gap Junctional Communication’, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 205, 429–434.Google Scholar
  22. Fyfe, D.M. and Hall, B.K.: 1993, ‘The origin of Ectomesenchymal Condensations which Precede Development of the Bony Scleral Ossicles in the Eyes of Embryonic Chicks’, J. Embryology and experimental Morphology 73, 69–86.Google Scholar
  23. Gass, G.L. and Bolker, J.A.: 2003, ‘Modularity’, in B.K. Hall and W.M. Olson (eds), Keywords and Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 260–267.Google Scholar
  24. Gilbert, S.F.: 1978. ‘The Embryological Origins of the Gene Theory’, J. History of Biology 11, 307–351.Google Scholar
  25. Gilbert, S.F. (ed.): 1991, Developmental Biology: A Comprehensive Synthesis. Volume 7, A Conceptual History of Modern Embryology, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Gilbert, S.F.: 1992, ‘Cells in Search of Community: Critiques of Weismannism and Selectable Units in Ontogeny’, Biology and Philosophy 7, 473–487.Google Scholar
  27. Gilbert, S.F.: 2000a, ‘Genes Classical and Genes Developmental: The Different Use of Genes in Evolutionary Syntheses’, in P.J. Beurton, R. Falk and H.-J. Rheinberger (eds), The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 178–192.Google Scholar
  28. Gilbert, S.F.: 2000b, Developmental Biology (6th edn.), Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  29. Gilbert, S.F., Opitz, J.M. and Raff, R.A.: 1996, ‘Resynthesizing Evolutionary and Developmental Biology’, Developmental Biology 173, 357–372.Google Scholar
  30. Griffiths, P.E.: 2001, ‘Genetic Information: A Metaphor in Search of a Theory’, Philosophy of Science 68, 394–412.Google Scholar
  31. Grüneberg, H.: 1963, The Pathology of Development, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.Google Scholar
  32. Guralnick, R. and Lindberg, D.R.: 2003. ‘Lineages: Cell and Phyletic’, in B.K. Hall and W.M. Olson (eds), Keywords and Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, pp. 243–249.Google Scholar
  33. Gurdon, J.B.: 1988. ‘A Community Effect in Animal Development’, Nature 366, 772–774.Google Scholar
  34. Hadorn, E.: 1978, ‘Transdetermination’, in M. Ashburner and T.R.F. Wright (eds), Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 2C, pp. 556–617.Google Scholar
  35. Haeckel, E.: 1866. Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, Vols. 1 & 2, Berlin.Google Scholar
  36. Haeckel, E.: 1905, The Riddle of the Universe at the Close of the Nineteenth Century (Joseph McCabe, trans.), Harper & Brothers Publishers, New York and London.Google Scholar
  37. Hall, B.K.: 1978, Developmental and Cellular Skeletal Biology, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  38. Hall, B.K.: 1983, ‘Epigenetic Control in Development and Evolution’, in B.C. Goodwin, N.J. Holder and C.C. Wylie (eds), Development and Evolution, British Society for Developmental Biology Symposium 6, Cambridge University Press, London and Cambridge, pp. 353–379.Google Scholar
  39. Hall, B.K.: 1992, Evolutionary Developmental Biology, Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  40. Hall, B.K.: 1996, ‘Baupläne, Phylotypic Stages and Constraint: Why There are so Few Types of Animals’, Evolutionary Biology 29, 215–261.Google Scholar
  41. Hall, B.K.: 1998a, ‘Epigenetics: Regulation not Replication’, J. Evolutionary Biology 11, 201–205.Google Scholar
  42. Hall, B.K.: 1998b, ‘Germ Layers and Germ-Layer Theory Revisited. Primary and Secondary Germ Layers, Neural Crest as a Fourth Germ Layer, Homology, and Demise of the Germ-Layer Theory’, Evolutionary Biology 30, 121–186.Google Scholar
  43. Hall, B.K.: 1999, Evolutionary Developmental Biology, (2nd edn.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  44. Hall, B.K.: 2000a, ‘Balfour, Garstang and de Beer: The First Century of Evolutionary Morphology’, American Zoologist 40, 718–728.Google Scholar
  45. Hall, B.K.: 2000b, ‘The Evolution of the Neural Crest in Vertebrates’, in L. Olsson and C.-O. Jacobson (eds), Regulatory Processes in Development, Wenner-Gren International Series Volume 76, The Portland Press, London, pp. 101–113.Google Scholar
  46. Hall, B.K.: 2001a, ‘The Gene is Not Dead, Merely Orphaned and Seeking a Home’, Evolution and Development 3, 225–228.Google Scholar
  47. Hall, B.K.: 2001b, ‘Foreword’, in M. Zelditch (ed.), Beyond Heterochrony: The Evolution of Development, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, pp. vii–ix.Google Scholar
  48. Hall, B.K.: 2001c, ‘A Review of Images of Development: Environmental Causes in Ontogeny by Cor Van der Weele’, Evolution and Development 3, 366–368.Google Scholar
  49. Hall, B.K.: 2002a, ‘Homoplasy and Homology: Dichotomy or Continuum?’, in C. Lockwood and J. Fleagle (eds), Homoplasy in Primate and Human Evolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, in press.Google Scholar
  50. Hall, B.K.: 2002b, ‘Descent with modification: The Unity Underlying Homology and Homoplasy as Seen Through an Analysis of Development and Evolution’, Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (in press).Google Scholar
  51. Hall, B.K.: 2002c, ‘Evolutionary Developmental Biology: Where Embryos and Fossils Meet’, in N. Minugh-Purves and K.J. McNamara (eds), Human Evolution Through Developmental Change, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 7–29.Google Scholar
  52. Hall, B.K.: 2002d, ‘Palaeontology and Evolutionary Developmental Biology: A Science of the 19th and 21st Centuries’, Palaeontology 45, 647–669.Google Scholar
  53. Hall, B.K.: 2003a, ‘Woodger, Joseph Henry (1894–1981)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, in association with the British Academy, Oxford University Press, Oxford (in press).Google Scholar
  54. Hall, B.K.: 2003b, ‘Evolution as the Control of Development by Ecology’, in B.K. Hall, R. Pearson and G.B. Müller (eds), Environment, Evolution and Developmen: Towards a Synthesis, MIT Press, Cambridge MA. (in press).Google Scholar
  55. Hall, B.K. and Miyake, T., 1992, ‘The Membranous Skeleton: The Role of Cell Condensations in Vertebrate Skeletogenesis’, Anatomy and Embryology 186, 107–124.Google Scholar
  56. Hall, B.K. and Miyake, T.: 1995, ‘Divide, Accumulate, Differentiate: Cell Condensation in Skeletal Development Revisited’, International Journal of Developmental Biology 39, 881–893.Google Scholar
  57. Hall, B.K. and Miyake, T.: 2000, ‘All for One and One for All: Condensations and the Initiation of Skeletal Development’, BioEssays 22, 138–147.Google Scholar
  58. Hall, B.K. and Olson, W.M. (eds): 2003, Keywords and Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  59. Hall, B.K., Pearson, R.D. and Müller, G.B. (eds): 2003 Environment, Development and Evolution; Toward a Synthesis, MIT Press, Cambridge MA (in press).Google Scholar
  60. Hall, B.K. and Wake, M.H. (eds.: 1999, The Origin and Evolution of Larval Forms, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  61. Hanken, J. and Hall, B.K.: 1993. The Skull Volume 1, Development, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  62. Haraway, D.J.: 1976, Crystals, Fabrics, and Fields. Metaphors of Organicism in Twentieth-Century Developmental Biology, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  63. Harris, H.: 1999, The Birth of the Cell, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  64. Harrison, R.G.: 1918, ‘Experiments on the Development of the Forelimb of Amblystoma, a Self-Differentiating, Equipotential System’, J. Experimental Zoology 25, 413–462.Google Scholar
  65. Harrison, R.G.: 1937, ‘Embryology and Its Relations’, Science 85, 370–374.Google Scholar
  66. Harrison, R.G.: 1969. Organization and Development of the Embryo (S. Wilens, ed.), Yale University Press, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
  67. Herring, S.W.: 1993, ‘Epigenetic and Functional Influences on Skull Growth’, in J. Hanken and B.K. Hall (eds), The Skull Volume 1, Development, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 153–206.Google Scholar
  68. Holliday, R.: 1994, ‘Epigenetics: An Overview’, Developmental Genetics 15, 453–457.Google Scholar
  69. Jablonka, E. and Lamb, M.J.: 1998, ‘Epigenetic Inheritance in Evolution’, J. Evolutionary Biology 11, 159–183.Google Scholar
  70. Keller, E.F.: 2000, The Century of the Gene, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  71. Kemp, T.S.: 1982, Mammal-Like Reptiles and the Origin of Mammals’, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  72. Kevles, D.J.: 1995, in the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity, with a new preface by the author, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  73. Kosher, R.A., Kulyk, W.M. and Gay, S.W.: 1986, ‘Collagen Gene Expression During Limb Cartilage Differentiation’, J. Cell Biology 102, 1151–1156.Google Scholar
  74. Larsen, E.W.: 1992, ‘Tissue Strategies as Developmental Constraints: Implications for Animal Evolution’, Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7, 414–417.Google Scholar
  75. Lewontin, R.: 1974, The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  76. Lewontin, R.: 1992, ‘The Dream of the Human Genome,’ New York Review of Books, May 28, 31–40.Google Scholar
  77. Lewontin, R.: 2000, The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and Environment, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  78. Maclean, N.M. and Hall, B.K.: 1987, Cell Determination and Differentiation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  79. MacDonald, M.E. and Hall, B.K.: 2001, ‘Altered Timing of the Extracellular-Matrix-Mediated Epithelial-Mesenchymal Interaction that Initiates Mandibular Skeletogenesis in Three Inbred Strains of Mice: Development, Heterochrony, and Evolutionary Change in Morphology’, J. Experimental Zoology 291, 258–273.Google Scholar
  80. Malcolm, S. and Goodship, J.: 2001. Genotype to Phenotype (2nd edn.), Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  81. Martin, J.F., Bradley, A. and Olson, E.N.: 1995, ‘The Paired-Like Homeobox Gene MHox is Required for Early Events of Skeletogenesis in Multiple Lineages’, Genes and Development 9, 1237–1249.Google Scholar
  82. Maynard Smith, J.: 1989, ‘Weismann and Modern Biology’, in P.H. Harvey and L. Partridge (eds), Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, Volume 6, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  83. Maynard Smith, J.: 1990, ‘Models of a Dual Inheritance System’, J. Theoretical Biology 143, 41–53.Google Scholar
  84. Mayr, E.: 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  85. Meinertzhagen, I.A.: 2002, ‘Cell Lineage’, in M. Pagel (ed.-in-chief), Encyclopedia of Evolution, Vol.1, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp. 142–144.Google Scholar
  86. Mezey, J.G., Cheverud, J.M. and Wagner, G.P.: 2000, ‘Is the Genotype-Phenotype Map Modular? A Statistical Approach Using Mouse Quantitative Trait Loci Data’, Genetics 156, 305–311.Google Scholar
  87. Miyake, T., Cameron, A.M. and Hall, B.K.: 1996. ‘Stage-Specific Onset of Condensation and Matrix Deposition for Meckel’s and other First Arch Cartilages in Inbred C57BL/6Mice’, J. Craniofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology 16, 32–47.Google Scholar
  88. Morgan, T.H. (1926).: ‘Genetics and the Physiology of Development’, American Naturalist 60, 489–515.Google Scholar
  89. Müller, G.B. and Olsson, L.: 2003, ‘Epigenesis and Epigenetics’, in B.K. Hall and W.M. Olson (eds), Keywords and Concepts in Evolutionary Developmental Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 114–123.Google Scholar
  90. Needham, J.: 1933, ‘On the Dissociability of the Fundamental Processes in Ontogenesis’, Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 8, 180–223.Google Scholar
  91. Olby, R.: 1985; Origins of Mendelism (2nd edn.), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  92. Oyama, S., Griffiths, P.E. and Gray, R.D. (eds): 2001, Cycles of Contingency. Developmental Systems and Evolution, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  93. Parker W.K.: 1890, ‘On the Skull of Tarsipes rostratus’, Studies from the Museum of Zoology, University College Dundee, 79–83 + plate.Google Scholar
  94. Patterson, C.: 1983, ‘How Does Phylogeny Differ from Ontogeny’, in B.C. Goodwin, N.J. Holder and C.C. Wylie (eds), Development and Evolution, British Society for Developmental Biology Symposium 6 Cambridge University Press, London and Cambridge, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
  95. Petronis, A.: 2001, ‘Human Morbid Genetics Revisited: Relevance of Epigenetics’, Trends in Genetics 17, 142–146.Google Scholar
  96. Provine W.: 1971, The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  97. Punnett, R.C.: 1922, Mendelism, MacMillan and Co., London.Google Scholar
  98. Raff, R.A.: 1996, The Shape of Life: Genes. Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  99. Richman, J. and Mitchell, P.J.: 1996, ‘Craniofacial Development: Knockout Mice Take One on the Chin’, Current Biology 6, 364–367.Google Scholar
  100. Rivera-Pérez, J.A., Mallo, M., Gendron-Maguire, M., Gridley, T. and Behringer, R.B.: 1995, ‘Goosecoid is Not an Essential Component of the Mouse Gastrula Organizer but is Required for Craniofacial and Rib Development’, Development 121, 3005–3012.Google Scholar
  101. Rivera-Pérez, J.A., Wakamiya, M. and Behringer, R.R.: 1999, ‘Goosecoid Acts Cell Autonomously in Mesenchyme-Derived Tissues During Craniofacial Development’, Development 126, 3811–3821.Google Scholar
  102. Robert, J.S., Hall, B.K. and Olson, W.M.: 2001, ‘Bridging the Gap between Developmental Systems Theory and Evolutionary Developmental Biology’, BioEssays 23, 954–962.Google Scholar
  103. Rosenberg, H.I. and Richardson, K.C.: 1995, ‘Cephalic Morphology of the Honey Possum, Tarsipes rostratus (Marsupialia: Tarsipedidae): An Obligate Nectarivore’, Journal of Morphology 233, 303–323.Google Scholar
  104. Sapp, J.: 1987, Beyond the Gene: Cytoplasmic Inheritance and the Struggle for Authority in Genetics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  105. Satokata, I. and Maas, R.: 1994, ‘Msx1 Deficient Mice Exhibit Cleft Palate and Abnormalities of Craniofacial and Tooth Development’, Nature Genetics 6, 348–356.Google Scholar
  106. Schroedinger, E.: 1944, What is Life, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  107. Smith, K.K. and Schneider, R.A.: 1998, ‘Have Gene Knockouts Caused Evolutionary Reversals in the Mammalian First Arch?’ BioEssays 20, 245–255.Google Scholar
  108. Smith, M.M. and Hall, B.K.: 1990, ‘Developmental and Evolutionary Origins of Vertebrate Skeletogenic and Odontogenic Tissues’, Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 65, 277–374.Google Scholar
  109. Sturtevant, A.H. and Beadle, G.W.: 1939, An Introduction to Genetics.Google Scholar
  110. Thesleff, I.: 1991, ‘Tooth Development,’ Dental Update November, 382–387.Google Scholar
  111. van der Weele, C.: 1999, Images of Development. Environmental Causes in Ontogeny, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
  112. Van Valen, L.: 1970, ‘An Analysis of Developmental Fields’, Developmental Biology 23, 456–477.Google Scholar
  113. Waddington, C.H.: 1956, Principles of Embryology, George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  114. Wagner, G.P.: 1996, ‘Homologues, Natural Kinds and the Evolution of Modularity’, American Zoologist 36, 36–43.Google Scholar
  115. Wagner, G.P. and Altenberg, L.: 1996, ‘Perspective: Complex Adaptations and the Evolution of Evolvability’, Evolution 50, 967–976.Google Scholar
  116. Watanabe, Y. and Le Douarin, N.M.: 1996, ‘A Role for BMP-4 in the Development of Subcutaneous Cartilage’, Mechanisms of Development 57, 69–78.Google Scholar
  117. Weber, K.E.: 1992. ‘How Small are the Smallest Selectable Domains of Form?’, Genetics 130, 345–353.Google Scholar
  118. Weiss, K.M and Fullerton, S.M.: 2000. ‘Phenogenetic Drift and the Evolution of Genotype-Phenotype Relationships’, Theoretical Population Biology 57, 187–195.Google Scholar
  119. Wilkins, A.S.: 2002, The Evolution of Developmental Pathways, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  120. Willmer, E.N.: 1960, Cytology and Evolution, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  121. Wilson, E.B.: 1896, The Cell in Development and Inheritance, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  122. Wilson, E.B.: 1925, The Cell in Development and Heredity (3rd edn.), Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  123. Wolf, J.B., Brodie, E.D. III., Cheverud, J.M., Moore, A.J. and Wade, M.J.: 1998, ‘Evolutionary Consequences of Indirect Genetic Effects’, TREE 13, 64–69.Google Scholar
  124. Woodger, J.H.: 1945, ‘On Biological Transformations’, in W.L. le Gros Clark and P.B. Medawar (eds), Essays on Growth and Form Presented to D’Arcy Wentworth Thompson, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 95–120.Google Scholar
  125. Wray, G.A. and Raff, R.A.: 1989. ‘Evolutionary Modification of Cell Lineage in the Direct-Developing Sea Urchin’, Heliocidaris erythrogramma, Developmental Biology 132, 458–470.Google Scholar
  126. Wray, G.A. and Raff, R.A.: 1990. ‘Novel Origins of Lineage Founder Cells in the Direct-Developing Sea Urchin’, Heliocidaris erythrogramma, Developmental Biology 141, 41–54.Google Scholar
  127. Zimmermann, B.: 1984, ‘Assembly and disassembly of Gap Junctions During Mesenchymal Cell Condensation and Early Chondrogenesis in Limb Buds of Mouse Embryos’, Journal of Anatomy 138, 351–364.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian K. Hall
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyDalhousie UniversityHalifax, NSCanada

Personalised recommendations