Advertisement

Foundations of Physics Letters

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 537–550 | Cite as

Correlations of continuous random data with major world events

  • R. D. Nelson
  • D. I. Radin
  • R. Shoup
  • P. A. Bancel
Article

Abstract

The interaction of consciousness and physical systems is most often discussed in theoretical terms, usually with reference to the epistemo-logical and ontological challenges of quantum theory. Less well known is a growing literature reporting experiments that examine the mind-matter relationship empirically. Here we describe data from a global network of physical random number generators that shows unexpected structure apparently associated with major world events. Arbitrary samples from the continuous, four-year data archive meet rigorous criteria for randomness, but pre-specified samples corresponding to events of broad regional or global importance show significant departures of distribution parameters from expectation. These deviations also correlate with a quantitative index of daily news intensity. Focused analyses of data recorded on September 11, 2001, show departures from random expectation in several statistics. Contextual analyses indicate that these cannot be attributed to identifiable physical interactions and may be attributable to some unidentified interaction associated with human consciousness.

Key words

physical random systems correlations in random data quantum randomness consciousness global events statistical anomalies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. Vincent, “The generation of truly random binary numbers,”J. Phys. E 3, 594–598 (1970).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Schmidt, “Quantum-mechanical random-number generator,”J. Appl. Phys. 41, 462–468 (1970).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D.I. Radin and R. D. Nelson,“Evidence for consciousness-related anomalies in random physical systems,”Found. Phys. 19, 1499–1514 (1989).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. G. Jahn, B. J. Dunne, R. D. Nelson, Y. H. Dobyns, and G. J. Bradish,“Correlations of random binary sequences with prestated operator intentions: A review of a 12-year program,”J. Scient. Expl. 11, 345–367 (1997).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. D. Nelson, “The Global Consciousness Project” (Web publication: Technical documentation and data access; http://noosphere. princeton.edu, 1998-present).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research,“Construction and Use of Random Event Generators in Human/Machine Anomalies Experiments” (PEAR Tech. Rep. 98002, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 1998).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. D. Nelson,“Correlation of global events with REG data: An Internet-based, nonlocal anomalies experiment,”J. Parapsych. 65, 247–271 (2001).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. D. Nelson, “Coherent Consciousness and Reduced Randomness: Correlations on September 11, 2001,”J. Sclent. Expl., in press (2002).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. D. Nelson, “GCP Prediction Registry” (Web publication: Protocol documentation; http://noosphere.princeton. edu/predictions.html, 1998-present).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. W. Snedecor and W. G. Cochran,Statistical Methods, 7th edn. (Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, 1980).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Walker,“An automatically generated pseudo-random clone of the GCP database” (Web publication; http://noosphere.princeton edu/pseudoeggs.html, 2000).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    InfoPlease “Year in Review, December 2000 through November 2001” (Web publication; http://www.infoplease.com, 2002).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. I. Radin, “Exploring relationships between random physical events and mass human attention: Asking for whom the bell tolls,”J. Sci. Expl., in press (2002).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Wackermann, “Towards a quantitative characterization of functional states of the brain: From the non-linear methodology to the global linear description,”Int. J. Psychophysiol. 34, 65–80 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    N. Cerf and C. Adami, “Quantum mechanics of measurement,”Phys. Rev. A (Web publication: http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/quantph/9605002, 1996).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    N. Cerf and C. Adami, “Information theory of quantum entanglement and measurement,”Physica D 120, 62–81 (special issue for PhysComp ’96, 1998).zbMATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Etter and H. P. Noyes, “Process, system, causality, and quantum mechanics: A psychoanalysis of animal faith,”Physics Essays 12, 4 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Amann, H. Atmanspacher, and U. Müller-Herold, eds.,On Quanta, Mind, and Matter (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1999).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. S. Jordan, ed.,Modeling Consciousness Across the Disciplines (University Press of America, New York, 1999).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. D. Nelson
    • 1
  • D. I. Radin
    • 2
  • R. Shoup
    • 3
  • P. A. Bancel
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringPrinceton UniversityPrinceton
  2. 2.Institute of Noetic SciencesPetaluma
  3. 3.Boundary InstituteLos Altos
  4. 4.PansFrance

Personalised recommendations