Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 85, Issue 3, pp 277–292

Review of Environmental Monitoring Methods: Survey Designs

  • Trent L. McDonald
Article

Abstract

During the past decade and a half, environmental monitoring programshave increased in numberand importance. Large scale environmental monitoring programs often present design difficulties because they tend to measure many(sometimes hundreds) of parameters through space and time. Thispaper reviewed and summarized one important component of environmental monitoring programs, the statistical survey design. Survey designsused for long-term monitoring programs lasting multiple (≥3)occasions were reviewed, paying specialattention to those published after 1985. During this review, two key components of the overall survey design were identified. The first key component wasthe membership design. Groups of population units sampled the same occasionwere called panels here, and the membership design specified which units were members of which panels. The second component was the revisit design that specified when panels were to be revisited. Membership designs varied, butsome form of simple random or systematic design was popular.Among revisit designs, four basicpatterns were found in the literature and their relative strengths andweaknesses were summarized. To efficiently discuss revisit designs, anew unified short-hand notation was proposed and adopted.

finite population change literature summary sample 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agarwal, C. L. and Tikkiwal, B. D.: 1975, 'Two-Stage Sampling on Successive Occasions'. In Proceedings of the 62nd Session of Indian Science Congress Association, Part III. p. 31.Google Scholar
  2. Bailar, B. A.: 1975, 'The effects of rotation group bias on estimates from panel surveys', J. Amer. Statis. Assoc. 70, 23-29.Google Scholar
  3. Bailar, B. A.: 1979, 'Rotation sample biases and their effects on estimates of change', Bull. Intern. Statis. Inst. 48(2), 385-407.Google Scholar
  4. Binder, D. A. and Hidiroglou, M. A.: 1988, 'Sampling in Time', in P. R. Krishnaiah and C. R. Rao (eds): Handbook of Statistics (Vol. 6), Amsterdam, pp. 187-211, North Holland.Google Scholar
  5. Breidt, F. J. and Fuller, W. A.: 1999, 'Design of supplemented panel surveys with application to the national resources inventory', J. Agric. Biolog. Environ. Statis. 4(4), 391-403.Google Scholar
  6. Cochran, W. G.: 1977, Sampling Techniques. New York: Wiley, 3 edition.Google Scholar
  7. Duncan, G. J. and Kalton, G.: 1987, 'Issues of design and analysis of surveys across time', Inter. Statis. Rev. 55, 97-117.Google Scholar
  8. Eager, C., Miller-Weeks, M., Gillespie, A. J. R. and Burkman, W.: 1991, 'Summary Report: Forest Health Monitoring-New England/Mid-Atlantic', Technical Report NE-INF-115-92, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Radnor, PA.Google Scholar
  9. Eckler, A. R.: 1955, 'Rotation Sampling', Ann. Mathem. Statis. 26, 664-685.Google Scholar
  10. Edwards, D.: 1998, 'Issues and themes for natural resources trend and change detection', Ecol. Applic. 8(2), 323-325.Google Scholar
  11. Ernst, T. L., Leibowitz, N. C., Roose, D., Stehman, S. and Urquhart, N. S.: 1995, 'Evaluation of USEPA Environmental monitoring and assessment program's (EMAP)-Wetlands sampling design and classification'. Environ. Manage. 19, 99-113.Google Scholar
  12. Fuller, W. A.: 1999, 'Environmental surveys over time', J. Agric. Biolog. Environ. Statis. 4(4), 331-345.Google Scholar
  13. Gurney, M. and Daly, J. F.: 1965, 'A Multivariate Approach to Estimation in Periodic Sample Surveys', in Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods, pp. 247-257.Google Scholar
  14. Hansen, M. H., Hurwitz, W. N. and Madow, W. G.: 1953, Sample Survey Methods and Theory. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Hansen, M. H., Hurwitz, W. N., Nisselson, H. and Steinberg, J.: 1955, 'The redesign of the census current population survey', J. Amer. Statis. Assoc. 50, 701-719.Google Scholar
  16. Huang, E. and Ernst, L.: 1981, 'Comparison of An Alternate Estimator to the Current Composite Estimator in CPS', in Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section. pp. 303-308, American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
  17. Jessen, R. J.: 1942, 'Statistical investigation of a sample survey for obtaining farm facts', Iowa Agric. Exper. Station Res. Bull. 304, 54-59.Google Scholar
  18. Kish, L.: 1965, Survey Sampling. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Kish, L.: 1983, 'Data Collection for Details over Space and Time', in T. Wright (ed.): Statistical Methods and the Improvement of Data Quality. Orlando, FL, pp. 73-84, Academic.Google Scholar
  20. Kish, L.: 1986, 'Timing of surveys for public policy', Austr. J. Statis. 28, 1-12.Google Scholar
  21. Krishnaiah, P. R. and Rao, C. R.: 1988, Handbook of Statistics 6-Sampling. New York: North Holland.Google Scholar
  22. Kumar, S. and Lee, J.: 1983, 'Evaluation of composite estimation for the Canadian Labour Force Survey', Surv. Methodol. 9, 178-201.Google Scholar
  23. Leatherberry, E. C., Spencer, J. J. S., Schmidt, T. L. and Carroll, M. R.: 1995, 'An Analysis of Minnesota's Fifth Forest Resources Inventory, 1990'. Technical Report Resource Bulletin NC-165, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  24. McRoberts, R. E. and Hansen, M.: 1999, 'Annual forest inventories for the North Central Region of the United States', J. Agric. Biolog. Environ. Statis. 4(4), 361-371.Google Scholar
  25. Moisen, G. G. and Edwards, J. T. C.: 1999, 'Use of generalized linear models and digital data in a forest inventory of Northern Utah', J. Agric. Biolog. Environ. Statis. 4(4), 372-390.Google Scholar
  26. Nusser, S. M., Breidt, F. J. and Fuller, W. A.: 1998, 'Design and estimation for investigating the dynamics of natural resources', Ecolog. Applic. 8(2), 234-245.Google Scholar
  27. Nusser, S. M. and Goebel, J. J.: 1997, 'The national resources inventory: a multi-resource monitoring program', Ecolog. Environ. Statis. 4, 181-204.Google Scholar
  28. Olsen, A. R., Sedransk, J., Gotway, C., Liggett, W., Rathbun, S., Reckhow, K., Young, L. and Edwards, D.: 1999, 'Statistical issues for monitoring ecological and natural resources in the United States', Environ. Monit. Assess. 54(1), 1-45.Google Scholar
  29. Olsen, A. R. and Smith, E. P.: 1999, 'Introduction to the special issue on surveys over time', J. Agric. Biolog. Environ. Statis. 4(4), 328-330.Google Scholar
  30. Overton, W. S., White, D. and Stevens, D. L.: 1990, 'Design Report for EMAP, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program', Technical Report EPA/600/3-91/053, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  31. Patterson, H. D.: 1950, 'Sampling on successive occasions with partial replacement of units', J. Roy. Statis. Soc., Ser. B 12, 241-255.Google Scholar
  32. Prabhu-Ajgaonkar, S. G.: 1967, 'The theory of univariate sampling on successive occasions under the general correlation patterns', Austr. J. Statis. 18, 56-63.Google Scholar
  33. Rao, J. N. K. and Graham, J. E.: 1964, 'Rotation designs for sampling on repeated occasions', J. Amer. Statis. Assoc. 63, 99-112.Google Scholar
  34. Reams, G. A. and Deusen, P. V.: 1999, 'The southern annual forest inventory system', J. Agric. Biolog. Environ. Statis. 4(4), 346-360.Google Scholar
  35. Sarndal, C. E., Swensson, B. and Wretman, J. H.: 1992, Model Assisted Survey Sampling. NewYork: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  36. Singh, D.: 1968, 'Estimates in successive sampling using multi-stage design', J. Amer. Statis. Assoc. 69, 99-109.Google Scholar
  37. Skalski, J. R.: 1990, 'A design for long-term status and trends', J. Environ. Manage. 30, 139-144.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, T. M. F.: 1978, 'Principles and Problems in the Analysis of Repeated Surveys', in M. K. Namboodini (ed.): Survey Sampling and Measurement. New York, pp. 201-206, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tikkiwal, B. D.: 1979, 'Successive sampling-A review', in: Proceedings of the 42nd Session of the International Statistical Institute held in Manilla, Book 2. pp. 367-384.Google Scholar
  40. Urquhart, N. S. and Kincaid, T. M.: 1999, 'Designs for detecting trend from repeated surveys of ecological resources', J. Agric. Biolog. Environ. Statis. 4(4), 404-414.Google Scholar
  41. Urquhart, N. S., Paulsen, S. G. and Larsen, D. P.: 1998, 'Monitoring for policy-relevant regional trends over time', Ecolog. Appl. 8(2), 246-257.Google Scholar
  42. Wolter, K.: 1979, 'Composite estimation in finite populations', J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 74, 604-613.Google Scholar
  43. Yates, F.: 1949, Sampling Methods for Censuses and Surveys, London: Charles Griffin, 1 edition.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Trent L. McDonald
    • 1
  1. 1.Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc.CheyenneU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations