Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 49, Issue 1–2, pp 11–19 | Cite as

Caring, Gender Role Orientation, and Volunteering

  • Rachel KarniolEmail author
  • Efrat Grosz
  • Irit Schorr
Article

Abstract

The current studies were conducted to examine two questions regarding the development of an ethic of care versus an ethic of justice, where the former is associated with being female and the latter is associated with being male. First, does gender role orientation in adolescence predict the ethical orientation one adopts better than gender itself does? Second, does adolescents' ethical orientation predict their volunteering behavior? To answer these questions, two studies were conducted. In Study 1, adolescents completed Bem's Sex Role Inventory (BSRI) and Jensen's World View Questionnaire (WVQ) which assesses ethical orientation. Girls and individuals high in femininity were higher on the ethic of care than were boys and individuals high in masculinity. In addition, individuals with a feminine gender orientation received higher care scores than individuals with an androgynous orientation. Regression analyses indicated that gender orientation accounted for more of the variance in the ethic of care than did gender. In Study 2, older adolescents completed Jensen's WVQ and were subsequently asked to volunteer in one of two settings: a personal setting or an impersonal setting. Individuals high in the ethic of care were more likely to volunteer and volunteered for more hours, but volunteered equally often in the two types of settings. Individuals who “apologized” for being unable to volunteer were higher on caring. The results are discussed in the context of Gilligan's theory of socialization to morality.

gender caring morality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ashmore, R. D. (1981). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 37-81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.Google Scholar
  3. Bem, S. L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634-643.Google Scholar
  4. Bem, S. L. (1984). Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 32, 179-226.Google Scholar
  5. Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the self: Gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Berkowitz, L., & Daniels, L. R. (1963). Responsibility and dependency. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 664-669.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.Google Scholar
  8. Dunn, J., Bretherton, I., & Munn, P. (1987). Conversations about feeling states between mothers and their children. Developmental Psychology, 23, 132-139.Google Scholar
  9. Eagly, A. H. & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of men and women into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754.Google Scholar
  10. Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100-131.Google Scholar
  11. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gilligan, C., & Attanucci, J. (1988). Two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 34, 223-237.Google Scholar
  13. Gilligan, C., & Wiggins, G. (1988). The origins of morality in early childhood relationships. In C. Gilligan, J. V. Ward, & J. M. Taylor (Eds.), Mapping the moral domain (pp. 111-138). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Greif, E. B., Alvarez, M., & Ullman, K. (1981). Recognizing emotions in other people: Sex differences in socialization. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston.Google Scholar
  15. Jensen, L. A. (1997). Different worldviews, different morals: America's culture war divide. Human Development, 40, 325-344.Google Scholar
  16. Jensen, L. C., McGhie, A. P., & JensenJ. R. (1991). Do men's and women's world-views differ? Psychological Reports, 68, 312-314.Google Scholar
  17. Karniol, R., Gabay, R., Ochion, Y., & Harari, Y. (1998). Is gender or gender-role orientation a better predictor of empathy in adolescence? Sex Roles, 39, 45-60.Google Scholar
  18. Kuebli, J., Butler, S., & Fivush, R. (1995). Mother-child talk about past emotions: Relations of maternal language and child gender over time. Cognition and Emotion, 9, 265-283.Google Scholar
  19. Lennon, R., & Eisenberg, N. (1987). Gender and age differences in empathy and sympathy, In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 195-217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Liddell, D. L., & Davis, T. L. (1996). The Measure of Moral Orientation: Reliability and validity evidence. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 485-493.Google Scholar
  21. Nelson, M. R. (1997). Examining the horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism within the United States and Denmark: How culture affects values, moral orientations and advertising persuasion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  22. Shields, S. A. (1995). The role of emotion beliefs and values in gender development. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 212-232.Google Scholar
  23. Soechting, I., Skoe, E. E., & Marcia, J. E. (1994). Care-oriented moral reasoning and prosocial behavior: A question of gender or sex role orientation. Sex Roles, 31, 131-147.Google Scholar
  24. Stander, V., & Jensen, L. (1993). The relationship of value orientation to moral cognition: Gender and cultural differences in the United States and China explored. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 42-52.Google Scholar
  25. Taylor, M. C., & Hall, J. A. (1982). Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods, and conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347-366.Google Scholar
  26. Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism & collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  27. Yacker, N., & Weinberg, S. L. (1990). Care and justice moral orientation: A scale for its assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 18-27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tel Aviv UniversityRamat AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations