Erkenntnis

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 77–95 | Cite as

Bohm's Metaphors, Causality, and the Quantum Potential

  • Marcello Guarini

Abstract

David Bohm's interpretation of quantum mechanics yields a quantum potential, Q. In his early work, the effects of Q are understood in causal terms as acting through a real (quantum) field which pushes particles around. In his later work (with Basil Hiley), the causal understanding of Q appears to have been abandoned. The purpose of this paper is to understand how the use of certain metaphors leads Bohm away from a causal treatment of Q, and to evaluate the use of those metaphors.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bohm, D.: 1952, ‘A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of 'Hidden' Variables, I and II’, Physical Review 85, 166-193.Google Scholar
  2. Bohm, D.: 1980, Wholeness and the Implicate Order, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London and New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bohm, D.: 1987, ‘Chapter Two' in B. J. Hiley and F. David Peat (eds.), Quantum Implications, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London and New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bohm, D. and B. J. Hiley: 1993, The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London and New York.Google Scholar
  5. Bohm, D. and J.-P. Vigier: 1954, ‘Model of the Causal Interpretations of Quantum Theory in Terms of a Fluid with Irregular Fluctuations’, Physical Review 96, 208-216.Google Scholar
  6. Bohr, N.: 1913, ‘On the Constitutions of Atoms and Molecules’, Philosophical Magazine 26, 1-25.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, N.: 1957, Foundations of Science: The Philosophy of Theory and Experiment, Dover Publications, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Cushing, J. T.: 1982, ‘Models and Methodologies in Current Theoretical High-Energy Physics’, Synthese 50, 5-101.Google Scholar
  9. Cushing, J. T.: 1990, Theory Construction and Selection in Modern Physics: The S Matrix, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
  10. Cushing, J. T.: 1994, Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.Google Scholar
  11. Dürr, D., S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghi: 1990, ‘On a Realistic Theory for Quantum Physics’, in S. Albeverio, G. Casati, U. Cattaneo, D. Merlini, and R. Moresi (eds.), Stochastic Processes, Physics and Geometry, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.Google Scholar
  12. Dürr, D., S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghi: 1992a, ‘Quantum Equilibrium and the Origin of Absolute Uncertainty’, Journal of Statistical Physics 67, 843-907.Google Scholar
  13. Dürr, D., S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghi: 1992b, ‘Quantum Chaos, Classical Randomness, and Bohmian Mechanics’, Journal of Statistical Physics 68, 843-907.Google Scholar
  14. Dürr, D., S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghi: 1993, ‘A Global Equilibrium as the Foundation of Quantum Randomness’, Foundations of Physics 23, 721-738.Google Scholar
  15. Hesse, M. B.: 1966, Models and Analogies in Science, University of Notre Dame Press, Indiana.Google Scholar
  16. Hesse, M. B.: 1974, The Structure of Scientific Inference, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  17. Maudlin, T.: 1994, Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics, Blackwell, Oxford UK and Cambridge USA.Google Scholar
  18. Nelson, E.: 1966, ‘Derivation of the Schrodinger Equation from Newtonian Mechanics’, Physical Review 150, 1079-1085.Google Scholar
  19. Nelson, E.: 1967, Dynamical Theories of Brownian Motion, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  20. Pickering, A.: 1980, ‘Exemplars and Analogies: A Comment on Crane's Study of Kuhnian Paradigms in High Energy Physics' and 'Reply to Crane’, Social Studies of Science 10, 497-502, 507-508.Google Scholar
  21. Pickering, A.: 1984, Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  22. Valentini, A.: 1991a, ‘Signal-Locality, Uncertainty, and the Subquantum H-Theorem. I’, Physics Letters A 156, 5-11.Google Scholar
  23. Valentini, A.: 1991b, ‘Signal-Locality, Uncertainty, and the Subquantum H-Theorem, II’, Physics Letters A 158, 1-8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcello Guarini
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy Faculty of ArtsThe University of WindsorWindsor

Personalised recommendations