Solar Physics

, Volume 213, Issue 2, pp 367–386 | Cite as

Coronal Magnetic Field Context of Simple CMEs Inferred from Global Potential Field Models

  • J.G. Luhmann
  • Yan Li
  • Xuepu Zhao
  • Seiji Yashiro


Most work on coronal mass ejection (CME) interpretation focuses on the involved active region rather than on the large-scale coronal context. In this paper a global potential-field source-surface model of the coronal magnetic field is used to evaluate the sensitivity of the coronal field configuration to the location, orientation, and strength of a bipolar active region relative to a background polar field distribution. The results suggest that the introduction of antiparallel components between the field of the active region and the background field can cause significant topological changes in the large-scale coronal magnetic field resembling observations during some simple CMEs. Antiparallel components can be introduced in the real corona by the diffusion and convection of photospheric fields, flux emergence, or erupted or shear-induced twist of active-region fields. Global MHD models with time-dependent boundary conditions could easily test the stability of such configurations and the nature of any related transients.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altschuler, M. D., Levine, R. M., Stix, M., and Harvey, J.: 1977, Solar Phys. 51, 345.Google Scholar
  2. Antiochos, S. K.: 1998, Astrophys. J. 502, L181.Google Scholar
  3. Antiochos, S. K., DeVore, C. R., and Klimchuk, J. A.: 1999, Astrophys. J. 510, 485.Google Scholar
  4. Aulanier, G. et al.: 1999, Astron. Astrophys. 342, 867.Google Scholar
  5. Beveridge, C., Priest, E. R., and Brown, D. S.: 2002, Solar Phys. 209, 333.Google Scholar
  6. Bungey, T. N.: 1995, Ph.D. Thesis, St. Andrews University.Google Scholar
  7. Delannée, C. and Aulanier, G.: 1999, Solar Phys. 190, 107.Google Scholar
  8. de Toma, G., White, O. R., and Harvey, K. L.: 2000, Astrophys. J. 529, 1101.Google Scholar
  9. Dungey, J. W.: 1961, Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 47.Google Scholar
  10. Falconer, D. A.: 2001, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 185.Google Scholar
  11. Feynman, J. and Martin, S. F.: 1995, J. Geophys. Res. 100, 3355.Google Scholar
  12. Forbes, T.: 2000, J. Geophys. Res. 105, 153.Google Scholar
  13. Gibson, S. E. et al.: 1999, Astrophys. J. 520, 871.Google Scholar
  14. Harrison, R. A., Hildner, E., Hundhausen, A. J., Sime, D. G., and Simnett, G. M.: 1990, J. Geophys. Res. 95, 917.Google Scholar
  15. Lewis, D. J. and Simnett, G. M.: 2000, Solar Phys. 191, 185.Google Scholar
  16. Li, Y., Luhmann, J. G., Mulligan, T., Hoeksema, J. T., Arge, C. N., Plunkett, S. P., and St. Cyr, O. C.: 2001, J. Geophys. Res. 106, 103.Google Scholar
  17. Linker, J. A. and Miki?, Z.: 1995, Astrophys. J. 438, L45.Google Scholar
  18. Longcope, D. W. and Kankelborg, C. C.: 2001, Earth, Planets Space 53, 571.Google Scholar
  19. Luhmann, J. G., Gosling, J. T., Hoeksema, J. T., and Zhao, X.-P.: 1998, J. Geophys. Res. 103, 6585.Google Scholar
  20. Mackay, D. H., Priest, E. R., and Lockwood, M.: 2002, Solar Phys. 207, 291.Google Scholar
  21. Miki?, Z., Linker, J. A., Schnack, D. D., Lionello, R., and Tarditi, A.: 1999, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2217.Google Scholar
  22. Priest, E. R.: 2001, Earth, Planets Space 53, 483.Google Scholar
  23. Priest, E. R. and Schrijver, C. J.: 1999, Solar Phys. 190, 1.Google Scholar
  24. Sheeley, N. R., Wang, Y-M., and Harvey, J. W.: 1989, Solar Phys. 119, 323.Google Scholar
  25. Sime, D. G.: 1989, J. Geophys. Res. 94, 151.Google Scholar
  26. Subramanian, P. and Dere, K. P.: 2001, Astrophys. J. 561, 372.Google Scholar
  27. Usmanov, A. V.: 1995, Space Sci. Rev. 72, 121.Google Scholar
  28. Wang, Y.-M. and Sheeley, N. R., Jr.: 1992, Astrophys. J. 392, 310.Google Scholar
  29. Wang, Y.-M. and Sheeley, N. R., Jr.: 1993, Astrophys. J. 414, 916.Google Scholar
  30. Wang, Y.-M. and Sheeley, N. R., Jr.: 1999, Astrophys. J. 510, L157.Google Scholar
  31. Wang, Y.-M. and Sheeley, N. R., Jr.: 2002, J. Geophys. Res. 107, 2001JA000500.Google Scholar
  32. Wang, Y.-M. et al.: 1997, Astrophys. J. 485, 875.Google Scholar
  33. Webb, D. F. et al.: 1997, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 161.Google Scholar
  34. Wu, S. T., Andrews, M. D., and Plunkett, S. P.: 2001, Space Sci. Rev. 95, 191.Google Scholar
  35. Zhao, X.-P. and Webb, D.F.: 2002, J. Geophys. Res., in press.Google Scholar
  36. Zirin, H: 1998, Astrophysics of the Sun, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.G. Luhmann
    • 1
  • Yan Li
    • 1
  • Xuepu Zhao
    • 2
  • Seiji Yashiro
    • 3
  1. 1.Space Sciences LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyU.S.A
  2. 2.Center for for Space Science and AstrophysicsStanford UniversityPalo AltoU.S.A
  3. 3.The Catholic University of AmericaWashington DC U.S.A

Personalised recommendations