Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 50, Issue 5, pp 507–517 | Cite as

Morphological diversity and potential interest for wheat improvement of three Aegilops L. species from Bulgaria

  • M. Zaharieva
  • A. Dimov
  • P. Stankova
  • J. David
  • P. Monneveux


A collection of fifty-two Aegilops accessions belonging to three tetraploid, self-pollinated species (Ae. cylindrica Host, Ae. geniculata Roth and Ae. neglecta Req. ex Bertol.) and sampled from different eco-geographical regions of Bulgaria was evaluated during three successive years on the basis of morphological descriptors and agronomical characters. Morphological diversity was analysed using a set of thirteen quantitative traits. Significant differences between populations were noted for most morphological traits, highest variation being observed in the three species for thousand kernel weight, grain weight per spike, plant height and earliness. There was not strong relation between the morphology of the studied accessions and their eco-geographical region of origin what was obviously due to marked differences between populations from the same region. The most important characters contributing to the eco-geographical differentiation were those related to vegetative growth in Ae. cylindrica and to grain production and earliness in Ae. geniculata. Considerable variability was found among and within species in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Ae. cylindrica accessions exibited high frost resistance, but were the most susceptible to rusts and powdery mildew. At the opposite Ae. neglecta and Ae. geniculata were characterized with high level of foliar diseases resistance. Moreover, Ae. geniculataaccessions appeared to be the best adapted to drought conditions. Promising accessions were identified and are presently used to introgress potentially useful traits into wheat.

Aegilops Ecogeographic variation Frost and drought Morphological diversity Powdery mildew Resistance Rusts 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ali Dib T., Monneveux P. and Araus J.L. 1990. Breeding durum wheat for drought tolerance. Analytical, synthetical approaches, and their connections. In: Panayotov I. and Pavlova S. (eds), Wheat Breeding, Prospects and Future Approaches. Institute for Wheat and Sunflower, Dobroudja, Bulgaria, pp. 224-240.Google Scholar
  2. Allard R.W. 1988. Genetic changes associated with the evolution of adaptedness in cultivated plants and their wild progenitors. J. Hered. 79: 225-238.Google Scholar
  3. Barashkova E.A. and Vavilov N. 1991. Physiological-genetic as-pects of frost resistance in winter wheat. Relationship of frost hardiness and genome composition in wheat. In: Panayotov I. and Pavlova S. (eds), Wheat Breeding, Prospects and Future Approaches. Institute for Wheat and Sunflower, Dobroudja, Bulgaria, pp. 379-384.Google Scholar
  4. Bochev B. and Kounovski Z. 1978. Study of the immunity mani-festations of the Aegilops species to Erysiphe graminis DC. f. sp. tritici Marchal in accordance to their genome composition Reports of the First National Symposium of Plant Immunity. Varna, Bulgaria, pp. 179-185.Google Scholar
  5. Condon A.G., Richards R.A. and Farquhar G.D. 1987. Carbon isotope discrimination is positively correlated with grain yield and dry matter production in field-grown wheat. Crop Sci. 27: 996-1001.Google Scholar
  6. Damania A.B. and Pecetti L. 1990. Variability in a collection of Aegilops species and evaluation for yellow rusts resistance at two parlocations in Northern Syria. J. Genet. and Breed. 44: 97-102.Google Scholar
  7. Dhaliwal H.S., Singh H., Gupta S., Bagga P.S. and Gill K.S. 1991. Evaluation of Aegilops and wild Triticum species for resistance to leaf rust (Puccinia recondita f. sp. tritici ) of wheat. Int. J. Trop. Agric. 9: 118-122.Google Scholar
  8. Dimov A., Boyadjieva D., Stankov I. and Vasilev I. 1990. Resistaccesance to brown and stem rust of newly selected lines of winter soft wheat. Plant Science 9: 3-8.Google Scholar
  9. Dwyer L.M. and Stewart D.W. 1987. Influence of photoperiod and water stress on growth, yield and development rate of barley measured in heat units. Can. J. Plant Sc. 67: 21-34.Google Scholar
  10. Ehleringer J.R. 1990. Correlations between carbon isotope dis-crimination and leaf conductance to water vapor in common beans. Plant Physiol. 93: 1422-1425.Google Scholar
  11. Farquhar G.D., Ehleringer J.R. and Hubick K.T. 1989. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. of Plant Physiol. and Plant Mol. Biol. 40: 503-537.Google Scholar
  12. Farquhar G.D. and Richards R.A. 1984. Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use-efficiency of wheat geno-types. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 11: 539-552.Google Scholar
  13. Feldman M. and Sears E.R. 1981. The wild gene resources of wheat. Scienntific American 244: 102-112.Google Scholar
  14. Hammer K. 1980. Vorarbeiten zur monographischen Darstellung von Wildpflanzen-sortimenten: Aegilops. Kulturpflanze 28: 33-180.Google Scholar
  15. Hamrick J.L. and Godt M.J.W. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Soltis D.E. and Soltis P.S. (eds), Isozymes in Plant Biology. Dioscorides Press, Washington D.C., USA, pp. 87-105.Google Scholar
  16. Holubec V., Havlickova H., Hanusova R. and Kostkanova E. 1993. Evaluation of Aegilops for aphid infestation, rust and powdery mildew resistance and seed quality. In: Damania A.B. (ed.), Biodiversity and Wheat Improvement. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, pp. 375-384.Google Scholar
  17. Horovitz A. and Feldman M. 1991. Evaluation of the wild-wheat study at Ammiad. Isr. J. Bot. 40: 501-508.Google Scholar
  18. Hsiao T.C. 1973. Plant response to water stress. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 24: 519-570.Google Scholar
  19. Jaradat A.A. 1989. Ecotypes and genetic divergence among sympatrically distributed populations of Hordeum vulgare and Hordeum spontaneum from the xeric regions of Jordan. Theor. Appl. Genet. 78: 857-862.Google Scholar
  20. Jaradat A.A. 1993. Ecogeographical races in natural populations of Triticum dicoccoides. In: Damania A.B. (ed.), Biodiversity and Wheat Improvement. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, pp.397-408.Google Scholar
  21. Kato K. and Yokoyama H. 1992. Geographical variation in heading sponcharacters among wheat landraces, Triticum aestivum L., and its meaimplication for their adaptability. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 259-265.Google Scholar
  22. Koleva E. and Peneva R. 1990. Climatic Report. Pluviometry in Bulgaria. Institute of Hydrobiology and Meteorology, Sofia, Bulgaria, (in Bulgarian).Google Scholar
  23. Kuchukova M. 1983. Climatic Report. Air and soil temperatures. Institute of Hydrobiology and Meteorology, Sofia, Bulgaria, (in Bulgarian).Google Scholar
  24. Le Boulc'h V., David J., Brabant P. and De Vallavieille-Pope C. 1994. Dynamic conservation of variability: response of wheat populations to different selective pressures including powdery mildew. Genet. Sel. Evol. 26: 221-240.Google Scholar
  25. Limin A.E. and Fowler D.B. 1981. Cold hardiness of some wild relatives of hexaploid wheat. Can. J. Bot. 59: 572-573.Google Scholar
  26. Merah O., Araus J.L., Souyris I., Nachit M.M., Deleens E. and Monneveux P. 2000. Carbon isotope discrimination: potential interest for grain yield improvement in durum wheat. Options ´ Medit. 40: 299-301.Google Scholar
  27. Nevo E. 1988. Genetic resources of wild emmer wheat revisited: genetic evolution, conservation and utilization. In: Miller T.E. th and Koebner R.M.D. (eds), Proc. 7 International Wheat genetics Symposium. Cambridge, UK, pp. 121-126.Google Scholar
  28. Penkov M. 1986. Soil Science. Technica, Sofia, Bulgaria, (in Bulgarian).Google Scholar
  29. Perrino P., Laghetti G., Cifarelli S., Volpe N. and Spagnoletti-Zeuli P.L. 1993. Wild wheats in southern Italy. In: Damania A.B. (ed.), Biodiversity and Wheat Improvement. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, pp. 361-368.Google Scholar
  30. Read J.J., Johnson D.A., Asay K.H. and Tieszen L.L. 1991. Carbon isotope discrimination, gas exchange, and water-use efficiency in crested wheatgrass clones. Crop Sci. 31: 1203-1208.Google Scholar
  31. Rekika D., Zaharieva M., Stankova P., Xu X., Souyris I. and Monneveux P. 1998. Abiotic stress tolerance in Aegilops species. In: Nachit M.M., Baum M., Porceddu E., Monneveux P. and Picard E. (eds), Sewana (South Europe, West Asia and North Africa) Durum Research Network. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria, pp.113-128.Google Scholar
  32. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA 1988. SAS/ Stat User's guide. Release 6.03 Edition.Google Scholar
  33. Snow L. and Brody T. 1984. Genetic variation in Hordeum sponcharacters taneum in Israel. Ecogegraphical races, detected by traits meaimplication surement. Plant Syst. and Evol. 145: 15-28.Google Scholar
  34. Spagnoletti-Zeuli P. and Qualset C.O. 1987. Geographical diversity for quantitative spike characters in a world collection of durum wheat. Crop Sci. 27: 235-241.Google Scholar
  35. Stankova P., Rekika D., Zaharieva M. and Monneveux P. P. 1995. Improvement of durum wheat for multiple stress tolerance: potential interest of Aegilops sp. In: Fibre and Cereal Crops Problems. Cotton and Durum Wheat Research Institute, Chirpan, Bulgaria, pp. 46-56.Google Scholar
  36. Valkoun J., Hammer K., Kucerova D. and Bartos P. 1985. Disease resistance in the genus Aegilops L. Stem rust, leaf rust and powdery mildew. Kulturpflanze 33: 133-153.Google Scholar
  37. Van Slageren M.W. 1994. Wild wheats. a monograph of Aegilops L. and Amblyopyrum (Jaub and Spach) Eig (Poaceae). Agricultural University,Wageningen, Netherlands - ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria.Google Scholar
  38. Vojdani P. and Meybodi M. 1993. Distribution and genetic diversity of primitive bread wheats in Iran. In: Damania A.B. (ed.), Biodiversity and Wheat Improvement. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, pp. 409-415.Google Scholar
  39. Waines J.G., Rafi M.M. and Ehdaie B. 1993. Yield components and transpiration efficiency in wild wheats. In: Damania A.B. (ed.), Biodiversity and Wheat Improvement. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, pp. 173-186.Google Scholar
  40. Zaharieva M. 1993. Aegilops species in Bulgaria. Their ecogeography and distribution. In: Damania A.B. (ed.), Biodiversity and Wheat Improvement. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, pp.369-374.Google Scholar
  41. Zaharieva M., David J., This D. and Monneveux P. 1999. Analyse de la diversité génétique d'Aegilops geniculata Roth en Bulgarie. Cahiers Agricultures 8: 181-188.Google Scholar
  42. Zaharieva M., Gaulin E., Havaux M., Acevedo E. and Monneveux P. 2001a. Leaf temperature and water status regulation in the wild wheat Ae. geniculata Roth (5 Ae. ovata L.) under Mediterranean field conditions. Crop Sci. 41: 1321-1329.Google Scholar
  43. Zaharieva M., Monneveux P., Henry M., Rivoal R., Valkoun J. and Nachit M.M. 2001b. Evaluation of a collection of wild wheat relative Aegilops geniculata Roth and identification of potential sources for useful traits. Euphytica 119: 33-38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Zaharieva
    • 1
  • A. Dimov
    • 2
  • P. Stankova
    • 2
  • J. David
    • 1
  • P. Monneveux
    • 1
  1. 1.UMR Diversité et Génome des Plantes Cultivées, ENSA-INRAMontpellier Cedex 01France
  2. 2.Institute of Plant Genetic ResourcesSadovoBulgaria

Personalised recommendations