Prediction of in Vivo Tissue Distribution from in Vitro Data. 2. Correlation Between in Vitro and in Vivo Tissue Distribution of a Homologous Series of Nine 5-n-Alkyl-5-Ethyl Barbituric Acids
- 166 Downloads
Purpose. To evaluate the ability to determine accurate in vivo tissue-to-unbound plasma distribution coefficients (Kpue) from in vitro data.
Methods. Fresh pieces of fifteen rat tissues/organs were incubated at 37°C with a homologous series of nine barbiturates covering a wide range of lipophilicity (Log P 0.02 to 4.13). Steady-state in vivoKpue values were estimated from the tissue and plasma concentrations following simultaneous dosing by constant rate i.v. infusion of all nine barbiturates. Drug concentrations in the tissues and media were determined by HPLC with UV or mass spectrometric detection.
Results. The pharmacokinetics of the barbiturate series following constant rate i.v. infusion indicated a range of clearance (0.49 to 30 ml.min\-1.kg\-1) and volume of distribution at steady state (0.51 to 1.9 l.kg\-1) values. Good agreement was observed between the in vitro and in vivoKpu values, although for the most lipophilic barbiturates the in vitro data underpredicted the in vivo tissue distribution for all tissues.
Conclusions. The in vitro system for predicting the extent of in vivo tissue distribution works well for compounds of widely differing lipophilicity, although for the most lipophilic drugs it may result in an underprediction of in vivo values.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.L. Granero, J. Chesa-Jimenez, V. Monserrat, M. Almela, M.-J. Gimeno, F. Torres-Molina, and J.-E. Peris-Ribera. Physiological pharmacokinetic model for ceftazidime disposition in the rat and its application to prediction of plasma concentration in humans. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 1:3–11 (1993).Google Scholar
- 7.G. E. Blakey, I. A. Nesterov, P. A. Arundel, L. J. Aarons, and M. Rowland. Quantitative structure pharmacokinetics relationships: 1. Development of a whole-body physiologically based model to characterize changes in pharmacokinetics across a homologous series of barbiturates in the rat. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 25:277–312 (1997).PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.R. Gubser, C. DiFransesco, and M. H. Bickel. Uptake of lipophilic model compounds into the isolated perfused rat epididymal adipose tissue. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Therap. 237:967–971 (1986).Google Scholar
- 10.A. Heatherington and M. Rowland. Estimation of reference spaces in the perfused rat hindlimb. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2:261–270 (1994).Google Scholar
- 13.M. H. Bickel and J. W. Steele. Binding of basic and acidic drugs to rat tissue subcellular fractions. Chemico-Biol. Int. 8:151–162 (1974).Google Scholar
- 14.W. O. Berndt. Use of the tissue slice technique for evaluation of renal transport processes. Env. Health Persp. 15:73–88 (1976).Google Scholar
- 15.R. Drew and Z. H. Siddik. Effect of a specific 5HT uptake inhibitor (citalopram) on drug accumulation by rat lung slices. Pharmacol. 20:27–31 (1980).Google Scholar
- 16.C. Post, R. G. G. Andersson, A. Ryrfeldt, and E. Nilsson. Transport and binding of lidocaine by lung slices and perfused lung of rats. Acta Pharmacol. Tox. 43:156–163 (1978).Google Scholar
- 17.P. Ballard, P. A. Arundel, D. E. Leahy, and M. Rowland. Prediction of in vivo tissue distribution from in vitro data 2. Influence of albumin diffusion from tissue slices during an in vitro incubation on estimated tissue-to-unbound plasma partition coefficients (Kpu). Pharm. Res. 20:857–863.Google Scholar
- 20.G. Blakey. Whole body tissue distribution of the 5-alkyl-5-ethyl barbituric acids in the rat (preliminary results). PhD thesis, University of Manchester, 1993.Google Scholar
- 22.C. B. Frederick, D. W. Potter, M. I. Chang-Mateu, and M. E. Andersen. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model to describe the oral dosing of rats with ethyl acrylate and its implications for risk assessment. Tox. Appl. Pharmacol. 114:246–260 (1992).Google Scholar
- 31.C. Hansch, A. R. Steward, S. M. Anderson, and D. Bentley. The parabolic dependence of drug action upon lipophilic character as revealed by a study of hypnotics. J. Med. Chem. 11:1–11 (1967).Google Scholar