Journal of Nonverbal Behavior

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 65–87 | Cite as

Evolved Disease-Avoidance Processes and Contemporary Anti-Social Behavior: Prejudicial Attitudes and Avoidance of People with Physical Disabilities

Article

Abstract

Drawing on evolutionary psychological logic, we describe a model that links evolved mechanisms of disease-avoidance to contemporary prejudices against individuals with physical disabilities. Because contagious diseases were often accompanied by anomalous physical features, humans plausibly evolved psychological mechanisms that respond heuristically to the perception of these features, triggering specific emotions (disgust, anxiety), cognitions (negative attitudes), and behaviors (avoidance). This disease-avoidance system is over-inclusive: Anomalous features that are not due to disease (e.g., limb amputation due to accident) may also activate it, contributing to prejudicial attitudes and behaviors directed toward people with disabilities. This model implies novel hypotheses about contemporary variables that may amplify or reduce disability-based prejudice. We discuss past research within this context. We also present new evidence linking chronic and temporary concerns about disease to implicit negative attitudes toward and behavioral avoidance of disabled others. Discussion focuses on the conceptual and practical implications of this evolutionary approach.

disability disgust evolved disease avoidance prejudice stigmatization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bishop, G. D., Alva, A. L., Cantu, L., & Rittiman, T. K. (1991). Responses to persons with AIDS: Fear of contagion or stigma? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1877–1888.Google Scholar
  4. Bjorklund, D. F., & Pellegrini, A. D. (2000). Child development and evolutionary psychology. Child Development, 71, 1687–1708.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., Lickel, B., & Kowai-Bell, N. (2001). Perceiver threat in social interactions with stigmatized others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 253–267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Buss, D. M. (1999). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  7. Comer, R. J., & Piliavin, J. A. (1972). The effects of physical deviance upon face-to-face interaction: The other side. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 33–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163–228). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Covey, H. C. (1998). Social perceptions of people with disabilities in history. Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
  10. Crandall, C. S. (1991). Do heavyweight students have more difficulty paying for college? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 606–611.Google Scholar
  11. Crandall, C. S. (1994). Prejudice against fat people: Ideology and self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 882–894.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Crandall, C. S., & Biernat, M. R. (1990). The ideology of anti-fat attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 227–243.Google Scholar
  13. Crandall, C. S., Glor, J., & Britt, T. W. (1997). AIDS-related stigmatization: Instrumental and symbolic attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 95–123.Google Scholar
  14. Crandall, C. S., & Moriarty, D. (1995). Physical illness stigma and social rejection. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 67–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Crawford, C., & Krebs, D. L. (1998). Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.Google Scholar
  17. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Goodall, J. (1986). Social rejection, exclusion, and shunning among the Gombe chimpanzees. Ethology and Sociobiology, 7, 227–236.Google Scholar
  19. Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 233–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Grillon, C., Pellowski, M., Merikangas, K. R., & Davis, M. (1997). Darkness facilitates acoustic startle reflex in humans. Biological Psychiatry, 42, 453–460.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701–713.Google Scholar
  23. Heatherton, T. F., Kleck, R. E., Hebl, M. R., & Hull, J. G. (2000). The social psychology of stigma. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hebl, M. R., Tickle, J., & Heatherton, T. F. (2000). Awkward moments in interactions between nonstigmatized and stigmatized individuals. In T. Heatherton, R. Kleck, J. G. Hull, & M. Hebl (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 272–306). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  25. Heinemann, W., Pellander, F., Antje, V., & Wojtek, B. (1981). Meeting a deviant person: Subjective norms and affective reactions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 1–25.Google Scholar
  26. Hummert, M. L. (1994). Physiognomic cues and activation of stereotypes of the elderly in interaction. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 39, 5–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones, E. E., Farina, A., Hastorf, A., Markus, H., Miller, D., & Scott, R. A. (1984). Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  28. Katz, I., Hass, R. G., & Bailey, J. (1988). Attitudinal ambivalence and behavior toward people with disabilities. In H. E. Yuker (Ed.), Attitudes toward persons with disabilities (pp. 47–57). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Kenrick, D. T., Li, N. P., & Butner, J. (2003). Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Individual decision rules and emergent social norms. Psychological Review, 110, 3–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kenrick, D. T., Sadalla, E. K., & Keefe. R. C. (1998). Evolutionary cognitive psychology: The missing heart of modern cognitive science. In C. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 485–514). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Kleck, R. E. (1968). Physical stigma and nonverbal cues emitted in face-to-face interaction. Human Relations, 21, 19–28.Google Scholar
  32. Kleck, R. E. (1969). Physical stigma and task oriented interactions. Human Relations, 22, 53–60.Google Scholar
  33. Kleck, R. E., & Dejong, W. (1981). Adults' estimates of sociometric status of handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Psychological Reports, 49, 951–954.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kleck, R. E., & DeJong, W. (1983). Physical disability, physical attractiveness, and social outcomes in children's small groups. Rehabilitation Psychology, 28, 1983.Google Scholar
  35. Kleck, R. E., Ono, H., & Hastorf, A. H. (1966). The effects of physical deviance upon face-toface interaction. Human Relations, 19, 425–436.Google Scholar
  36. Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. R. (2001). Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 187–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Langer, E. J., Fiske, S., Taylor, S. E., & Chanowitz, B. (1976). Stigma, staring, and discomfort: A novel-stimulus hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 253–259.Google Scholar
  38. Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115–121.Google Scholar
  39. Larsen, K. S., Reed, M., & Hoffman, S. (1980). Attitudes of heterosexuals toward homosexuality: A Likert-type scale and construct validity. Journal of Sex Research, 16, 245–257.Google Scholar
  40. Montepare, J. M., & Zebrowitz, L. A. (2002). A social-developmental view of ageism. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Ageism (pp. 77–125). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Neuberg, S. L., Smith, D. M., & Asher, T. (2000). Why people stigmatize: Toward a biocultural framework. In T. Heatherton, R. Kleck, J. G. Hull, & M. Hebl (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 31–61). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  42. Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fear, phobia, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483–522.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ohnuki-Tierney, E. (1984). Illness and culture in contemporary Japan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Pachuta, D. M. (1996). Chinese medicine: The law of five elements. In A. A. Sheikh, & K. S. Sheikh (Eds.), Healing East & West (pp. 64–90). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., & Landau, S. (1999). A social-psychological analysis of HIV-related stigma: A two-factor theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 1193–1211.Google Scholar
  46. Rhodes, G., Proffitt, F., Grady, J. M., & Sumich, A. (1998). Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 659–669.Google Scholar
  47. Rhodes, G., Zebrowitz, L. A., Clark, A., Kalick, S. M., Hightower, A., & McKay, R. (2001). Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 31–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Richardson, S. A., Ronald, L., & Kleck, R. E. (1974). The social status of handicapped and nonhandicapped boys in a camp setting. Journal of Special Education, 8, 143–152.Google Scholar
  49. Rozin, P., & Fallon, A. E. (1987). A perspective on disgust. Psychological Review, 94, 23–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Rozin, P., Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Imada, S. (1997). Disgust: Preadaptation and the cultural evolution of a food-based emotion. In H. MacBeth (Ed.), Food preferences and taste (pp. 65–82). Providence: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  51. Ryan, W. (1971). Blaming the victim. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  52. Schaller, M., & Park, J. H. (in press). Prehistoric dangers and contemporary prejudices. European Review of Social Psychology.Google Scholar
  53. Schaller, M., Park, J. H., Faulkner, J., Duncan, L. A., Kelly, C., & Dhanoa, G. (2003). Perceived vulnerability to disease predicts negative reactions to foreign peoples: Studies on implicit stereotypes and immigration attitudes. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  54. Schiefenhovel, W. (1997). Good tastes and bad tastes: Preferences and aversions as biological principles. In H. MacBeth (Ed.), Food preferences and taste (pp. 55–64). Providence: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  55. Shackelford, T. K., & Larsen, R. J. (1997). Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 456–466.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Sigelman, C. K., Adams, R. M., Meeks, S. R., & Purcell, M. A. (1986). Children's nonverbal responses to a physically disabled person. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 10, 173–186.Google Scholar
  57. Simpson, J. A., & Kenrick, D. T. (1997). Evolutionary social psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  58. Snyder, M. L., Kleck, R. E., Strenta, A., & Mentzer, S. J. (1979). Avoidance of the handicapped: An attributional ambiguity analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2297–2306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Thompson, T. L. (1982). Gaze toward and avoidance of the physically handicapped: A field experiment. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 6, 188–196.Google Scholar
  60. Ustun, T. B., et al. (2001). Disability and culture: Universalism and diversity. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.Google Scholar
  61. Wang, J.-Y. (1991). Psychosomatic illness in the Chinese cultural context. In L. Romanucci-Ross, D. E. Moerman, & L. R. Tancredi (Eds.), The anthropology of medicine (2nd. Ed., pp. 322–342). New York: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  62. Wilson, B., & Ryan, A. S. (1990). Working with the terminally ill Chinese-American patient. In J. K. Parry (Ed.), Social working practice with the terminally ill: A transcultural perspective (pp. 145–158).Google Scholar
  63. Zebrowitz, L. A., & Collins, M. A. (1997). Accurate social perception at zero acquaintance: The affordances of a Gibsonian approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 204–223.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Justin H. Park
    • 1
  • Jason Faulkner
    • 2
  • Mark Schaller
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.University of British Columbia???

Personalised recommendations