Networking Through Loose and Strong Ties: An Australian Qualitative Study

  • Rosemary Leonard
  • Jenny Onyx


Given the significant role attributed to community organizations by many social capital scholars, it is appropriate to investigate the dynamics of that process. In particular, Woolcock and Narayan (World Bank Res. Obs.15(2): 225–249, 2000) have suggested that bridging and bonding are two different types of connections, whereby bridging is associated with loose ties across communities and bonding is associated with strong ties within a limited group. This qualitative study explores the loose and strong ties of 39 participants connected through community organizations in rural and urban New South Wales. The results suggest that loose and strong ties are not synonymous with bridging and bonding. In general loose and strong ties differ in degree rather than in kind and people prefer to bridge through their strong ties. The interesting exceptions were ties to professionals, which were highly trusted but defined as loose ties. It is suggested that a model for a high social capital society might be a chain of well-bonded groups each with strong links to some other groups.

social capital bonding bridging networking trust Australia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosemary Leonard
    • 1
  • Jenny Onyx
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Applied Social & Human SciencesUniversity of Western SydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of ManagementUniversity of TechnologySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations