Networking Through Loose and Strong Ties: An Australian Qualitative Study

  • Rosemary Leonard
  • Jenny Onyx


Given the significant role attributed to community organizations by many social capital scholars, it is appropriate to investigate the dynamics of that process. In particular, Woolcock and Narayan (World Bank Res. Obs.15(2): 225–249, 2000) have suggested that bridging and bonding are two different types of connections, whereby bridging is associated with loose ties across communities and bonding is associated with strong ties within a limited group. This qualitative study explores the loose and strong ties of 39 participants connected through community organizations in rural and urban New South Wales. The results suggest that loose and strong ties are not synonymous with bridging and bonding. In general loose and strong ties differ in degree rather than in kind and people prefer to bridge through their strong ties. The interesting exceptions were ties to professionals, which were highly trusted but defined as loose ties. It is suggested that a model for a high social capital society might be a chain of well-bonded groups each with strong links to some other groups.

social capital bonding bridging networking trust Australia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blomkvist, H. (2001). Traditional communities, caste, and democracy: The Indian mystery. In: Dekker, P., and Uslaner, E. (eds.), Social Capital and Politics in Everyday Life, Routledge, London, pp. 73-88.Google Scholar
  2. Burt, R. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Adm. Sci. Q. 42: 339-365.Google Scholar
  3. Burt, R. (1998). The gender of social capital. Ration. Soc. 10(1): 5-42.Google Scholar
  4. Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94: 95-120.Google Scholar
  5. De Tocqueville, A. (1961). Democracy in America (originally published 1835), Schoken, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Granovetter, M. (1986). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91: 481-510.Google Scholar
  9. Hughes, P., Bellamy, J., and Black, A. (1999). Building social trust through education. In: Winter, I. (ed.), Social Capital and Public Policy in Australia,Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne, pp. 225-249.Google Scholar
  10. Leonard, R. (1997). Theorising the relationship between agency and communion. Theory Psychol. 7(6): 823-835.Google Scholar
  11. Newton, K. (1997). Social capital and democracy. Am. Behav. Sci. 40(5): 575-586.Google Scholar
  12. Onyx, J., and Bullen, P. (2000). Measuring social capital in five communities. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 36(1): 23-42.Google Scholar
  13. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24: 1-24.Google Scholar
  14. Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  15. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Simons, R. (1996). A community of freedoms. Aust. Q. 68(1): 31-42.Google Scholar
  17. Swain, A. (2000). Social Capital and Popular Mobilization: Studying Environmental Protests in an Indian State. Unpublished manuscript, Uppsala University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  18. Teorell, J. (2000). A Resource Model of Social Capital: Networks, Recruitment and Political Participa-tion in Sweden. Paper presented to workshop on voluntary associations, social capital and interest mediation, European Consortium for Political Research, Copenhagen, Denmark, April.Google Scholar
  19. Uslaner, E. M. (1997). Faith, Hope and Charity. Unpublished manuscript, University of Maryland–College Park.Google Scholar
  20. White, J., Reedy, E., and Leonard, R. (2001). Addressing Women's Fear of Crime in Public Housing Estates: The Case of Toongabbie. Report (unpublished) to the NSW Council of Social Services.Google Scholar
  21. Woolcock, M., and Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research and policy. World Bank Res. Obs. 15(2): 225-249.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Third-Sector Research and The Johns Hopkins University 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosemary Leonard
    • 1
  • Jenny Onyx
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Applied Social & Human SciencesUniversity of Western SydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of ManagementUniversity of TechnologySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations