Mathematical Geology

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 279–300 | Cite as

Isometric Logratio Transformations for Compositional Data Analysis

  • J. J. Egozcue
  • V. Pawlowsky-Glahn
  • G. Mateu-Figueras
  • C. Barceló-Vidal

Abstract

Geometry in the simplex has been developed in the last 15 years mainly based on the contributions due to J. Aitchison. The main goal was to develop analytical tools for the statistical analysis of compositional data. Our present aim is to get a further insight into some aspects of this geometry in order to clarify the way for more complex statistical approaches. This is done by way of orthonormal bases, which allow for a straightforward handling of geometric elements in the simplex. The transformation into real coordinates preserves all metric properties and is thus called isometric logratio transformation (ilr). An important result is the decomposition of the simplex, as a vector space, into orthogonal subspaces associated with nonoverlapping subcompositions. This gives the key to join compositions with different parts into a single composition by using a balancing element. The relationship between ilr transformations and the centered-logratio (clr) and additive-logratio (alr) transformations is also studied. Exponential growth or decay of mass is used to illustrate compositional linear processes, parallelism and orthogonality in the simplex.

Aitchison distance Aitchison geometry geodesic orthogonal subcompositions ternary diagram 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Aitchison, J., 1986, The statistical analysis of compositional data: Monographs on statistics and applied probability: Chapman & Hall Ltd., London, 416p.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aitchison, J., 1989, Measures of location of compositional data sets: Math. Geol., v.21, no.7, p. 787-790.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aitchison, J., 1990, Relative variation diagrams for describing patterns of compositional variability: Math. Geol., v.22, no.4, p. 487-511.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aitchison, J., 1992, On criteria for measures of compositional difference: Math. Geol., v.24, no.4, p. 365-379.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aitchison, J., 1997, The one-hour course in compositional data analysis or compositional data analysis is simple, in V. Pawlowsky-Glahn, ed., Proceedings of the third annual conference of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, Vol.I, II and addendum: International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE), Barcelona, p. 3-35.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aitchison, J., 2002, Simplicial inference, in M. A. G. Viana and D. S. P. Richards, eds., Contemporary Mathematics Series, Vol.287: Algebraic Methods in Statistics and Probability: American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, p. 1-22.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aitchison, J., Barceló-Vidal, C., Martín-Fernández, J. A., and Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., 2000, Logratio analysis and compositional distance: Math. Geol. v.32, no.3, p. 271-275.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aitchison, J., and Thomas, C. W., 1998, Differential perturbation processes: A tool for the study of compositional processes, in A. Buccianti, G. Nardi, and R. Potenza, eds., Proceedings of the fourth annual conference of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, Vol.I and II: De Frede Editore, Napoli, p. 499-504.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barceló-Vidal, C., Martín-Fernindez, J. A., and Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., 2001, Mathematical foundations of compositional data analysis: in G. Ross, ed., Proceedings of the sixth annual conference of the International Association for Mathematical Geology Cancun (Mexico) CD-Rom.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berberian, S. K., 1961, Introduction to Hilbert space: Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 206p.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Billheimer, D., Guttorp, P., and Fagan, W. F., 2001, Statistical interpretation of species composition: J. Am. Stat. Assoc., v.96, no.456, p. 1205-1214.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martín-Fernández, J. A., Olea-Meneses, R. A., and Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., 2001, Criteria to compare estimation methods of regionalized compositions: Math. Geol., v.33, no.8, p. 889-909.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martín-Fernández, J. A., Barceló-Vidal, C., and Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., 2003, Dealing with zeros and missing values in compositional data sets using nonparametric imputation: Math. Geol., v.35, no.3, p. 253-278.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., 2002, Lecture notes on statistical analysis of compositional data: Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., and Egozcue, J. J., 2001, Geometric approach to statistical analysis on the simplex: Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., v.15, no.5, p. 384-398.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., and Egozcue, J. J., 2002, BLU estimators and compositional data: Math. Geol., v.34, no.3, p. 259-274.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    von Eynatten, H., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., and Egozcue, J. J., 2002, Understanding perturbation on the simplex: A simple method to better visualise and interpret compositional data in ternary diagrams: Math. Geol., v.34, no.3, p. 249-275.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. J. Egozcue
    • 1
  • V. Pawlowsky-Glahn
    • 2
  • G. Mateu-Figueras
    • 3
  • C. Barceló-Vidal
    • 4
  1. 1.Spain
  2. 2.Spain
  3. 3.Spain
  4. 4.Spain

Personalised recommendations