Journal of Medical Systems

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 315–324 | Cite as

Measuring the Performance of Neonatal Care Units in Scotland

  • Kamal Field
  • Ali Emrouznejad


Policy makers continue to debate whether or not to increase the share of health care expenditures in United Kingdom. On the other hand, the pressure of operating within tight budgets and the advances in technology are forcing more locally based hospitals to close. One that could be used by policy makers as a benchmark is the measure of relative performance of hospitals. Many researchers have examined the source of inefficiency in health sectors (see, for example, Harris et al.Oper. Res. Soc. 57: 801–811, 2000, Ozcan et al., Med. Case 30:781–784, 1992; Ozcan et al., J. Med. Syst. 20(3)141–150, 1996; and Grosskopf and Valdmanis, J. Health. Econ. 6:89–107, 1987 but there is no evidence of measuring performance of neonatal care units of Scottish hospitals in the DEA literature. The purpose of this paper is to measure both technical and scale efficiency using data envelopment analysis in a selection of 22 neonatal care units in Scotland. The analysis suggests that major inefficiency likely exists in health care production in United Kingdom. There is potential for improving productivity by 20%.

data envelopment analysis hospital efficiency health case policy neonatal care unit health sector performance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Brazier, J., Hutton, J., and Jeavons, R., Evaluating the reform of the NHS. In A. J. Culyer, A. K. Maynard, and J. W. Posnett, Ed., The Competition in Health Care, Macmlilan, London, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cooper, W. W., Gu., B., and Li, S., Comparisons and evaluations of alternative approaches to the treatment of congestion in DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 132:62–74, 2001.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jacobs, R., Alternative Methods to Examine Hospital Efficiency: Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis, University of York, York, 2000.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grosskopf, S., Valdmanis, V., Measuring hospital performance: A non-parametric approach. J. Health Econ. 6:89–107, 1987.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bruning, E. R., and Register, Technical efficiency within hospital. Do profit incentive's matter? Appl. Econ., 21:1217–1233, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Charnes, A., Cooper, W., and Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2:429–44, 1978.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Farrell, Farrell, The measurement of productive efficiency, J. Royal Stat. Soc., Ser. A, Gen., 120(3):253–281, 1957.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lovell, C. A. Knox, Production frontiers and productive efficiency, In The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Technique and application, Fried, H., Lovell,, C. A., and Schmidt,, S. Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Forsund, F., Lovell, C. A. K., and Schmidt, P., A Survey of frontier production functions and their relationship to measurement, J. Econometr. 13:5–25, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cooper, W. W., Seiford, M. L., and Tone, K., Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text With Models, Applications, References and DEA Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Field, K., Production efficiency of British building societies. Appl. Econ., 22:415–26, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. Arie, Y., and Seiford, M. L., Eds., Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Application, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1995.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Emrouznejad, A., Ali Emrouznejad's DEA HomePage,, Warwick Business School, Warwick University, U.K., 1995–2001.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Färe, R. S., Grosskopf, S., and Lovell, C. A. K., The Measurement of Efficiency of Production, Kluwer-Nijhoff, Boston, 1985.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grosskopf, S., Margaritis, D., Valdmanis, V., Estimating output substitutability of hospital services—a distance function-approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 80:575–587, 1995.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    The Cost Book, The Scottish National Health Services, Information & Statistics Division, Scottish Office, Edinburgh (year ended 31st March 1994), 1994.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thatchell, M., Measuring hospital output. Soc. Sci. Med. 13:871–883, 1983.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anderson, P., and Peterson, N. C., A procedure for ranking efficient units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Manag. Sci. 39:1261–1264, 1993.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harris, J. M., Ozgen, H., and Ozcan, Y. A., Do mergers enhance the performance of hospital efficiency? J. Oper. Res. Soc. 51:801–811, 2000.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ozcan, Y. A., McCue, M. J., Okasha, A. A., Measuring the technical efficiency of psychiatric hospitals. J. Med. Syst. 20(3):141–150, 1996.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ozcan, Y. A., Luke, R. D., and Haksever, C., Ownership and organisational performance: A comparison of technical efficiency across hospital type. Med. Care. 30:781–794, 1992.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kamal Field
    • 1
  • Ali Emrouznejad
    • 2
  1. 1.Lloyds TSBLondonUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Statistics and Operational Research GroupCoventry UniversityCoventryUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations