Environmental Fluid Mechanics

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 331–362 | Cite as

Transport and Diffusion of Ozone in the Nocturnal and Morning Planetary Boundary Layer of the Phoenix Valley

  • Sang-Mi Lee
  • Harindra J.S. Fernando
  • Marko Princevac
  • Dragan Zajic
  • Michela Sinesi
  • Jennifer L. McCulley
  • James Anderson


The evolution of ozone (O3) in the nocturnal and morning-transitional planetary boundary layer (PBL) of the Phoenix valley was measured as a part of the ‘Phoenix Sunrise Experiment 2001’ of the U.S. Department of Energy conducted in June 2001. The goal of the field program was to study the transport, distribution and storage of ozone and its precursors in the urban boundary layer over a diurnal cycle. The ground level O3 as well as mean meteorological variables and turbulence were measured over the entire period, and vertical profiling (using a tethered balloon) was made during the morning transition period. Approximately half of the observational days showed the usual diurnal cycle of high O3 during the day and low O3 at night, with nitrogen oxides (NOx = NO2 + NO) showing an out of phase relationship with O3. The rest of the days were signified by an anomalous increase of O3 in the late evening (∼ 2200 LST), concomitant with a sudden drop of temperature, an enhancement of wind speed and Reynolds stresses, a positive heat flux and a change of wind direction. NOx measurements indicated the simultaneous arrival of an ‘aged’ air mass, which was corroborated by the wind predictions of a mesoscale numerical model. In all, the results indicate that the recirculation of O3 rich air masses is responsible for the said high-O3 events. Such air masses are produced during the transport of O3 precursors by the upslope flow toward mountainous suburbs during the day, and they return back to the city at night via downslope winds (i.e. mountain breeze). The corresponding flow patterns, and hence the high-O3 events, are determined by background meteorological conditions. The vertical profiling of O3 and flow variables during the morning transition points to a myriad of transport, mixing and chemical processes that determine the fate of tropospheric O3. How well such processes are incorporated and resolved in predictive O3 models should determine the accuracy of their predictions.

convective boundary layer high ozone episode low level jet nocturnal boundary layer recirculation of ozone thermal circulation vertical ozone profile 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Seinfeld, J.H. and Pandis, S.N.: 1998, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1326 pp.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thompson, A.M., Newman, P.A., Gleason, G.A., Bourne, W.H. and Dickerson, R.R.: 2002, Strategies for observing and modeling pollution, EOS 83(49), 575–581.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Whiteman, C.D.: 2000, Mountain Meteorology: Fundamentals and Applications, Oxford University Press, 355 pp.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fast, J.D., Doran, J.C., Shaw, W.J., Coulter, R.L. and Martin, T.J.: 2000, The evolution of the boundary layer and its effect on air chemistry in the Phoenix area, J. Geophys. Res. 105, 22833–22848.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nappo, C.J.: 1991, Sporadic breakdowns of stability in the PBL over simple and complex terrain, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 54, 69–87.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pardyjak, E., Fernando, H.J.S., Anderson, J. and Berman, N.: 1999, Breakdown of complex terrain atmospheric boundary layers, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 44, 171.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blumen, W., Banta, R., Burns, S.P., Fritts, D.C., Newson, R., Poulos, G.S. and Sun, J.: 2001, Turbulence statistics of a Kelvin-Helmholtz billow event observed in the nighttime boundary layer during the CASES-99 field program, Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 34, 187–204.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Doran, J.C., Fast, J.D. and Horel, J.: 2002, The VTMX campaign, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 83, 537–551.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pardyjak, E.R., Fernando, H.J.S., Hunt, J.C.R., Grachev, A.A. and Anderson, J., Evolution of nocturnal circulation in complex terrain: Phoenix air flow experiment (PAFEX-1), Boundary-Layer Meteorol.(submitted).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fernando, H.J.S., Lee, S.-M., Anderson, J., Princevac, M., Pardyjak, E. and Grossman-Clarke, S.: 2000, Urban fluid mechanics: Air circulation and contaminant dispersion in cities, Environ. Fluid Mech. 1, 107–164.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ching, J.K.S., Godowitch, J.M. and Clarke, J.F.: 1983, Urban scale variations of turbulent energy fluxes, AMS specialty conference on air quality modeling of the nonhomogeneous, nonstationary urban boundary layer, Oct. 31-Nov. 4, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Strang, E.J. and Fernando, H.J.S.: 2001, Turbulence and mixing in stratified shear flows, J. Fluid Mech. 428, 349–386.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    DeSilva, I.P.D., Fernando, H.J.S., Eaton, F. and Hebert, D.: 1996, Kelvin-Helmholtz billows in nature and laboratory, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 143, 217–231.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dudhia, J.: 1993, A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State-NCAR Mesoscale Model: Validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front, Mon. Wea. Rev. 121, 1493–1513.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grell, G.A., Dudhia, J. and Stauffer, D.R.: 1994, A Description of the Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5), NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-398+STR, 122 pp.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dudhia, J., Gill, D., Guo, Y.-R., Manning, K., Wang, W. and Chiszar, J.: 2000, PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Modeling System Tutorial Class Notes and User's Guide: MM5 Modeling System Version 3, NCAR.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee, S-M., Zehnder, J.A. and Fernando, H.J.S.: 2003, Evaluation of meteorological models, MM5 and HOTMAC, using PAFEX-1 data. J. Appl. Meteorol.(in revision).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hunt, J.C.R.: 1985, Diffusion in the stably stratified atmospheric boundary layer, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol. 24, 1187–1195.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fernando, H.J.S., Chen, R-R. and Boyer, D.L.: 1991, Turbulent thermal convection in rotating fluids, J. Fluid Mech. 228, 513–547.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fernando, H.J.S. and Little, L.J.: 1990, Molecular diffusive effects in penetrative convection, Phys. Fluids A 2, 1592–1596.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tse, K.L., Mahalov, A., Nicolaenko, B. and Fernando, H.J.S., Quasi-equilibrium dynamics of stratified turbulence in a model tropospheric jet, J. Fluid Mech.(submitted).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Turner, J.S.: 1979, Buoyancy Effects in Fluids, Cambridge University Press, New York, 291 pp.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fernando, H.J.S. and Hunt, J.C.R.: 1997, Turbulence, waves and mixing at shear-free density interfaces; Part 1-A theoretical model, J. Fluid Mech. 347, 197–234.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hunt, J.C.R.: 1984, Turbulence structure in thermal convection and shear-free boundary layers, J. Fluid Mech. 138, 161–184.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Turner, J.S.: 1991, Convection and mixing in the oceans and the Earth, Phys. Fluids A 3, 1218–1232.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Doran, J.C., Berkowitz, C.M., Coulter, R.L., Spicer, C. W., The 2001 Phoenix Sunrise Experiment: Vertical mixing and chemistry during the morning transition in Phoenix. Atmos. Environ.(in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sang-Mi Lee
    • 1
  • Harindra J.S. Fernando
    • 2
  • Marko Princevac
    • 2
  • Dragan Zajic
    • 2
  • Michela Sinesi
    • 3
  • Jennifer L. McCulley
    • 2
  • James Anderson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringEnvironmental Fluid Dynamics Program, Arizona State UniversityTempeU.S.A
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and Aerospace Engineering Environmental Fluid Dynamics ProgramArizona State UniversityTempeU.S.A.
  3. 3.Departimento di Idraulica Trasporti e StradeUniversita degli Studi di Roma La SapienzaRomaItalia

Personalised recommendations